tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 01 Feb 2009 09:29:10
From: Professor X
Subject: 13-6 na.na.na 13-6na.na.na
13-6 na.na.na 13-6na.na.na




 
Date: 01 Feb 2009 10:10:54
From: robin
Subject: Re: 13-6 na.na.na 13-6na.na.na
On 1 Feb, 17:58, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 1, 5:53=A0pm, "Bonaf" <david.bonafo...@free.fr> wrote:
>
> > "Professor X" :
>
> > > 13-6 na.na.na 13-6na.na.na
>
> > Funny that it applies to the head-to-head but also to the slams won (in
> > reversed order).
>
> how do you know which I was reffering to lol ;-)
>
> Maybe that was the double-significance/intelligence of my post??? :-D

I thought that you were asking for help with your maths homework.


 
Date: 01 Feb 2009 09:58:45
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: 13-6 na.na.na 13-6na.na.na
On Feb 1, 5:53=A0pm, "Bonaf" <david.bonafo...@free.fr > wrote:
> "Professor X" :
>
> > 13-6 na.na.na 13-6na.na.na
>
> Funny that it applies to the head-to-head but also to the slams won (in
> reversed order).

how do you know which I was reffering to lol ;-)

Maybe that was the double-significance/intelligence of my post??? :-D


 
Date: 01 Feb 2009 18:53:01
From: Bonaf
Subject: Re: 13-6 na.na.na 13-6na.na.na

"Professor X" :

> 13-6 na.na.na 13-6na.na.na

Funny that it applies to the head-to-head but also to the slams won (in
reversed order).