tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 17 Feb 2009 10:00:21
From: Silence, Fedfucker!
Subject: Best and worst analysts on rst
The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
Ramirez.

Worst by far is Skriptis.

(of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to be
analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some kind of
expert status)




 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 02:16:49
From: robin
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On 18 Feb, 09:57, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> robin wrote:
> > On 17 Feb, 18:34, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
> >> jdeluise wrote:
> >>> On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
> >>>> Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
> >>>>> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> >>>>> Ramirez.
> >>>>> Worst by far is Skriptis.
> >>>>> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to
> >>>>> be analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some
> >>>>> kind of expert status)
> >>>> Please, it's *skriptis.
> >>>> Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
> >>>> provided no evidence to support your claim.
> >>>> Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.
> >>> Same with 7543 yet you believe it:)
> >> Well for starters, you have FO site.
> >> That makes W>all other slams very much proven, doesn't it?
>
> >> So you have "7" certified. And if you make a further effort and engage
> >> yourself in a deeper insight you'll find out all the other number work=
as
> >> well, just like I did.
>
> > Care to provide this number work, or are you just going to fall back
> > on childish emperors-new-clothes style arguments?
>
> For those with poor attitude no answer will suffice. =A0Read the rst
> history with an open mind & you'll realize it makes perfect sense.

Emperor's new clothes it is, then.


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 19:10:55
From: guyana
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Feb 17, 9:49=A0pm, amy <amy.lynn1...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:23=A0pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:33:20 -0800 (PST), zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> > >On Feb 17, 12:33=A0pm, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 17, 1:00 pm, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
>
> > >> <thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> > >> > The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> > >> > Ramirez.

> > >> > Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> > >> Please, it's Striptease.
>
> > >> He's Whisper's aborted twin.
> > >Whisper himself is an abortion failure.
>
> > must be true cause whispers mom told me his brother was an only child.
>
> hey superdave is your mom wearing them crotchless panties =A0we got her?

Superdave is hazelwood not raja who is very annoying list maker!&


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 18:49:32
From: amy
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Feb 17, 6:23=A0pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:33:20 -0800 (PST), zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >On Feb 17, 12:33=A0pm, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 17, 1:00 pm, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
>
> >> <thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> >> > Ramirez.
>
> >> > Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> >> Please, it's Striptease.
>
> >> He's Whisper's aborted twin.
> >Whisper himself is an abortion failure.
>
> must be true cause whispers mom told me his brother was an only child.

hey superdave is your mom wearing them crotchless panties we got her?


  
Date: 18 Feb 2009 21:01:06
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
amy wrote:
> On Feb 17, 6:23 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:33:20 -0800 (PST), zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>> On Feb 17, 12:33 pm, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 17, 1:00 pm, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
>>>> <thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>>>>> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
>>>>> Ramirez.
>>>>> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>>>> Please, it's Striptease.
>>>> He's Whisper's aborted twin.
>>> Whisper himself is an abortion failure.
>> must be true cause whispers mom told me his brother was an only child.
>
> hey superdave is your mom wearing them crotchless panties we got her?


She is, but she's in her 90's so not a pretty sight.



 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 18:48:43
From: amy
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Feb 17, 5:34=A0pm, zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Feb 17, 12:00=A0pm, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
>
> <thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> > The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> > Ramirez.
>
> > Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> > (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to be
> > analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some kind of
> > expert status)
>
> Since you are me, this is a weird question... where do I stand?

Raja is the greatest ANAList he is the greatest catcher in gaydom.


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 15:34:42
From:
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Feb 17, 12:00=A0pm, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
<thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk > wrote:
> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> Ramirez.
>
> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to be
> analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some kind of
> expert status)

Since you are me, this is a weird question... where do I stand?


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 15:08:38
From: Patrick Kehoe
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Feb 17, 10:00=A0am, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
<thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk > wrote:
> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> Ramirez.
>
> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to be
> analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some kind of
> expert status)

++ Yes... Jason, Drew (when he's in a good mood), lol, and Joe are the
heavy bats around here when the topics actually support analysis...


P


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 12:38:09
From: Joe Ramirez
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Feb 17, 3:08=A0pm, robin <robinson.n...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 17 Feb, 18:34, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > jdeluise wrote:
> > > On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
> > >> Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
> > >>> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> > >>> Ramirez.
>
> > >>> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> > >>> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to
> > >>> be analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some
> > >>> kind of expert status)
>
> > >> Please, it's *skriptis.
>
> > >> Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
> > >> provided no evidence to support your claim.
> > >> Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.
>
> > > Same with 7543 yet you believe it:)
>
> > Well for starters, you have FO site.
> > That makes W>all other slams very much proven, doesn't it?
>
> > So you have "7" certified. And if you make a further effort and engage
> > yourself in a deeper insight you'll find out all the other number work =
as
> > well, just like I did.
>
> Care to provide this number work, or are you just going to fall back
> on childish emperors-new-clothes style arguments?

He does not mean "number work" in the sense of calculations or
documentation. I think he meant to write "numbers work," as in "you'll
find out all the other numbers work as well," meaning that the point
values make sense to him.

Joe Ramirez


  
Date: 18 Feb 2009 20:59:46
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
Joe Ramirez wrote:
> On Feb 17, 3:08 pm, robin <robinson.n...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 17 Feb, 18:34, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> jdeluise wrote:
>>>> On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>>>>> Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
>>>>>> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
>>>>>> Ramirez.
>>>>>> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>>>>>> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to
>>>>>> be analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some
>>>>>> kind of expert status)
>>>>> Please, it's *skriptis.
>>>>> Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
>>>>> provided no evidence to support your claim.
>>>>> Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.
>>>> Same with 7543 yet you believe it:)
>>> Well for starters, you have FO site.
>>> That makes W>all other slams very much proven, doesn't it?
>>> So you have "7" certified. And if you make a further effort and engage
>>> yourself in a deeper insight you'll find out all the other number work as
>>> well, just like I did.
>> Care to provide this number work, or are you just going to fall back
>> on childish emperors-new-clothes style arguments?
>
> He does not mean "number work" in the sense of calculations or
> documentation. I think he meant to write "numbers work," as in "you'll
> find out all the other numbers work as well," meaning that the point
> values make sense to him.
>
> Joe Ramirez


They make sense no matter how you cut the slam combinations - eg 1
Wimbledon is considered more meritorious than 2 AOs, but not 3. Wim/AO
is considered a better year than USO/FO etc




 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 12:08:12
From: robin
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On 17 Feb, 18:34, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr > wrote:
> jdeluise wrote:
> > On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
> >> Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
> >>> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> >>> Ramirez.
>
> >>> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> >>> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to
> >>> be analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some
> >>> kind of expert status)
>
> >> Please, it's *skriptis.
>
> >> Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
> >> provided no evidence to support your claim.
> >> Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.
>
> > Same with 7543 yet you believe it:)
>
> Well for starters, you have FO site.
> That makes W>all other slams very much proven, doesn't it?
>
> So you have "7" certified. And if you make a further effort and engage
> yourself in a deeper insight you'll find out all the other number work as
> well, just like I did.

Care to provide this number work, or are you just going to fall back
on childish emperors-new-clothes style arguments?


  
Date: 18 Feb 2009 20:57:39
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
robin wrote:
> On 17 Feb, 18:34, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>> jdeluise wrote:
>>> On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>>>> Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
>>>>> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
>>>>> Ramirez.
>>>>> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>>>>> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to
>>>>> be analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some
>>>>> kind of expert status)
>>>> Please, it's *skriptis.
>>>> Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
>>>> provided no evidence to support your claim.
>>>> Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.
>>> Same with 7543 yet you believe it:)
>> Well for starters, you have FO site.
>> That makes W>all other slams very much proven, doesn't it?
>>
>> So you have "7" certified. And if you make a further effort and engage
>> yourself in a deeper insight you'll find out all the other number work as
>> well, just like I did.
>
> Care to provide this number work, or are you just going to fall back
> on childish emperors-new-clothes style arguments?


For those with poor attitude no answer will suffice. Read the rst
history with an open mind & you'll realize it makes perfect sense.



 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 11:33:20
From:
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Feb 17, 12:33=A0pm, drew <d...@technologist.com > wrote:
> On Feb 17, 1:00 pm, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
>
> <thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
> > The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> > Ramirez.
>
> > Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> Please, it's Striptease.
>
> He's Whisper's aborted twin.
Whisper himself is an abortion failure.


  
Date: 18 Feb 2009 00:23:10
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 11:33:20 -0800 (PST), zepfloyes@yahoo.com wrote:

>On Feb 17, 12:33 pm, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 17, 1:00 pm, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
>>
>> <thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>> > The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
>> > Ramirez.
>>
>> > Worst by far is Skriptis.
>>
>> Please, it's Striptease.
>>
>> He's Whisper's aborted twin.
>Whisper himself is an abortion failure.


must be true cause whispers mom told me his brother was an only child.


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 10:33:13
From: drew
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
On Feb 17, 1:00 pm, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
<thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk > wrote:
> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> Ramirez.
>
> Worst by far is Skriptis.

Please, it's Striptease.

He's Whisper's aborted twin.


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 19:11:09
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> Ramirez.
>
> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>
> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to be
> analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some kind of
> expert status)


Please, it's *skriptis.

Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
provided no evidence to support your claim.
Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.




  
Date: 17 Feb 2009 18:23:58
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst

On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skriptis@post.t-com.hr > wrote:

> Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
> > The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> > Ramirez.
> >
> > Worst by far is Skriptis.
> >
> > (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to be
> > analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some kind of
> > expert status)
>
>
> Please, it's *skriptis.
>
> Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
> provided no evidence to support your claim.
> Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.

Same with 7543 yet you believe it:)


   
Date: 17 Feb 2009 19:34:30
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst
jdeluise wrote:
> On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
>> Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
>>> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
>>> Ramirez.
>>>
>>> Worst by far is Skriptis.
>>>
>>> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to
>>> be analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some
>>> kind of expert status)
>>
>>
>> Please, it's *skriptis.
>>
>> Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
>> provided no evidence to support your claim.
>> Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.
>
> Same with 7543 yet you believe it:)

Well for starters, you have FO site.
That makes W >all other slams very much proven, doesn't it?

So you have "7" certified. And if you make a further effort and engage
yourself in a deeper insight you'll find out all the other number work as
well, just like I did.





    
Date: 19 Feb 2009 13:54:44
From: Bob
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst

"*skriptis" <skriptis@post.t-com.hr > wrote
> So you have "7" certified.

I think you made an error. I came up with 5.28 for W because 'strawberries
and cream' are worth 1.221 and no more according to the FO site (and they
wouldn't lie). I had to round it off, but 2 decimal points is probably good
enough. In case of a tie you could include more digits.

The entire exact scheme (with round offs) is 5.28, 4.56, 4.54, and 4.18.
Note: the FO is penalized for the ugly red stain on players' clothes (a
champ covered with dirt is clearly lesser). It's rock solid since everything
that goes in it has been quantified AND certified.




    
Date: 17 Feb 2009 18:44:27
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Best and worst analysts on rst

On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skriptis@post.t-com.hr > wrote:

> jdeluise wrote:
> > On 17-Feb-2009, "*skriptis" <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
> >
> >> Silence, Fedfucker! wrote:
> >>> The best analysts I would say are MBDunc, Jason Catlin and Joe
> >>> Ramirez.
> >>>
> >>> Worst by far is Skriptis.
> >>>
> >>> (of course, I am not counting the trolls who don't even pretend to
> >>> be analysts, i.e. mzgurl and the like, just those who claim some
> >>> kind of expert status)
> >>
> >>
> >> Please, it's *skriptis.
> >>
> >> Of course, you're entitled to your own opinion but I must say you've
> >> provided no evidence to support your claim.
> >> Hence the whole post you made is completely meaningless.
> >
> > Same with 7543 yet you believe it:)
>
> Well for starters, you have FO site.
> That makes W>all other slams very much proven, doesn't it?
>
> So you have "7" certified. And if you make a further effort and engage
> yourself in a deeper insight you'll find out all the other number work as
> well, just like I did.

What? FO said W was worth 7? Where?

Anyway, your buddy's comments in the other thread I started about 7543 made
it clear 7543 is just a long-running joke and that even he doesn't believe
in it. You're being played, my friend.