tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 04 Jan 2009 11:19:49
From:
Subject: Come on Barney!!!
... stop that Fat Phil winning his 15th world title ...





 
Date: 04 Jan 2009 15:19:25
From:
Subject: Re: Come on Barney!!!
On Jan 4, 9:56=A0pm, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 5, 3:13=A0am, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > is it 13 or 14 - can't remember.
>
> > > > Barney's blown some chances to stay in the match - can't afford to =
do
> > > > that
>
> > > > 14 world titles - time to start the old debate about which sportsma=
n
> > > > has been most dominant? (I can feel Jahangir Khan's name coming up
> > > > again ...)
>
> > > You mean Jansher.
>
> > No
>
> You think Jansher was less dominant?

This came up before - more about winning streaks. Jahangir had that
amazing unbeaten streak which topped anything anyone else did in other
sports.



  
Date: 05 Jan 2009 09:11:18
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Come on Barney!!!
<gregorawe@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:1650f5d2-f85b-4c0c-84a6-a027e79eb050@w39g2000prb.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 4, 9:56 pm, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zah...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 5, 3:13 am, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> > > > is it 13 or 14 - can't remember.
>
> > > > Barney's blown some chances to stay in the match - can't afford to
> > > > do
> > > > that
>
> > > > 14 world titles - time to start the old debate about which sportsman
> > > > has been most dominant? (I can feel Jahangir Khan's name coming up
> > > > again ...)
>
> > > You mean Jansher.
>
> > No
>
> You think Jansher was less dominant?
>
>This came up before - more about winning streaks. Jahangir had that
>amazing unbeaten streak which topped anything anyone else did in other
>sports.

yes, remember this debate well, didn't he win 550 squash matches in a row!!




 
Date: 04 Jan 2009 13:56:39
From: arnab.z@gmail
Subject: Re: Come on Barney!!!
On Jan 5, 3:13=A0am, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > > is it 13 or 14 - can't remember.
>
> > > Barney's blown some chances to stay in the match - can't afford to do
> > > that
>
> > > 14 world titles - time to start the old debate about which sportsman
> > > has been most dominant? (I can feel Jahangir Khan's name coming up
> > > again ...)
>
> > You mean Jansher.
>
> No

You think Jansher was less dominant?


 
Date: 04 Jan 2009 13:13:38
From:
Subject: Re: Come on Barney!!!
> > is it 13 or 14 - can't remember.
>
> > Barney's blown some chances to stay in the match - can't afford to do
> > that
>
> > 14 world titles - time to start the old debate about which sportsman
> > has been most dominant? (I can feel Jahangir Khan's name coming up
> > again ...)
>
> You mean Jansher.

No



 
Date: 04 Jan 2009 13:06:28
From: arnab.z@gmail
Subject: Re: Come on Barney!!!
On Jan 5, 2:58=A0am, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > AND NOW
> > FROM STOKE-ON-TRENT
> > THE 13th TIMES CHAMPION OF THE WOORLD
> > IT's PHIL...
> > THE POWERRRRRRRRRRRR TAYLOR
>
> > There is only ONEEE Phil TAYLORRR
>
> > btw he's about to win his 14th ! world championship leadong 6-1
> > against Barney.
> > averaging almost 110.....
>
> is it 13 or 14 - can't remember.
>
> Barney's blown some chances to stay in the match - can't afford to do
> that
>
> 14 world titles - time to start the old debate about which sportsman
> has been most dominant? (I can feel Jahangir Khan's name coming up
> again ...)

You mean Jansher.


 
Date: 04 Jan 2009 13:06:27
From: BlackJAG
Subject: Re: Come on Barney!!!
On Jan 4, 9:58=A0pm, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > AND NOW
> > FROM STOKE-ON-TRENT
> > THE 13th TIMES CHAMPION OF THE WOORLD
> > IT's PHIL...
> > THE POWERRRRRRRRRRRR TAYLOR
>
> > There is only ONEEE Phil TAYLORRR
>
> > btw he's about to win his 14th ! world championship leadong 6-1
> > against Barney.
> > averaging almost 110.....
>
> is it 13 or 14 - can't remember.
>
> Barney's blown some chances to stay in the match - can't afford to do
> that
>
> 14 world titles - time to start the old debate about which sportsman
> has been most dominant? (I can feel Jahangir Khan's name coming up
> again ...)

edit:
AND NOW
FROM STOKE-ON-TRENT
THE 14th TIMES CHAMPION OF THE WOORLD
IT's PHIL...
THE POWERRRRRRRRRRRR TAYLOR

There is only ONEEE Phil TAYLORRR
ONEEE PHIL TAYLOR
WALKING ALONG
SINGING THIS SONG
WALKING IN TAYLOR WONDERLAND!

AWESOME


 
Date: 04 Jan 2009 12:58:50
From:
Subject: Re: Come on Barney!!!
> AND NOW
> FROM STOKE-ON-TRENT
> THE 13th TIMES CHAMPION OF THE WOORLD
> IT's PHIL...
> THE POWERRRRRRRRRRRR TAYLOR
>
> There is only ONEEE Phil TAYLORRR
>
> btw he's about to win his 14th ! world championship leadong 6-1
> against Barney.
> averaging almost 110.....

is it 13 or 14 - can't remember.

Barney's blown some chances to stay in the match - can't afford to do
that

14 world titles - time to start the old debate about which sportsman
has been most dominant? (I can feel Jahangir Khan's name coming up
again ...)



 
Date: 04 Jan 2009 12:51:19
From: BlackJAG
Subject: Re: Come on Barney!!!
On Jan 4, 8:19=A0pm, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
> ... stop that Fat Phil winning his 15th world title ...

lol now someone finally brought this up....IMHO what Phil TAYLOR has
been doing the past 15 years is beyond imagination
to be honest no other sportsman or woman comes even close.

AND NOW
FROM STOKE-ON-TRENT
THE 13th TIMES CHAMPION OF THE WOORLD
IT's PHIL...
THE POWERRRRRRRRRRRR TAYLOR

There is only ONEEE Phil TAYLORRR

btw he's about to win his 14th ! world championship leadong 6-1
against Barney.
averaging almost 110.....