tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 25 Jan 2009 21:29:06
From: RahimAsif
Subject: Darren Cahill
"Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...




 
Date: 26 Jan 2009 08:01:17
From:
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
On Jan 26, 12:29=A0am, RahimAsif <RahimA...@gmail.com > wrote:
> "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
> final".

Shows you just how smart Cahill really is.

I call him cocky Cahill, because he knows everything about tennis.
Has all the answers and the advice to give to any player to make them
the best in the world.


 
Date: 26 Jan 2009 15:51:57
From: Richard Eich
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
RahimAsif@gmail.com wrote...
> "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
> final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...

Cahill hates Fed for some reason -- he probably takes Roche's side in
whatever dispute there was between Fed and Roche.

--
A fight starts when a man reaches the limits of his intelligence.


 
Date: 26 Jan 2009 10:30:08
From: Stapler
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
"RahimAsif" <RahimAsif@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:73bda645-6e95-42c0-a773-12cbc1df98b1@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
> final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...


Oh wow. I just lost all respect for Cahill. How can he disrespect Fed like
that!



 
Date: 26 Jan 2009 02:05:53
From: Jason Catlin
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
On Jan 26, 12:39=A0am, RahimAsif <RahimA...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 11:36=A0pm, "wkhedr" <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > This should please a Federer fan like you.
> > Cahill knows it all, having Murray and Nadal won HC slams more than Fed=
erer
> > did :)
>
> > "RahimAsif" <RahimA...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:73bda645-6e95-42c0-a773-12cbc1df98b1@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
> > > final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...
>
> The reason I posted this is because I didn't like it, its
> disrespectful to Fed. But Cahill is widely respected for his tennis
> acumen...

So is Wilander and his contribution was: "this court doesn't take spin
so that favors Murray and Djokovic. This isn't the court for Rafa and
Fed"


 
Date: 25 Jan 2009 23:35:36
From: kaennorsing
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
On 26 jan, 07:36, akamai <akamai.nak...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 11:39 pm, RahimAsif <RahimA...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 25, 11:36 pm, "wkhedr" <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > > This should please a Federer fan like you.
> > > Cahill knows it all, having Murray and Nadal won HC slams more than Federer
> > > did :)
>
> > > "RahimAsif" <RahimA...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:73bda645-6e95-42c0-a773-12cbc1df98b1@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > > "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
> > > > final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...
>
> > The reason I posted this is because I didn't like it, its
> > disrespectful to Fed. But Cahill is widely respected for his tennis
> > acumen...
>
> It does not need any special acumen for one to say they are the
> favourites. Anyone who can see Nadal play like this will see that Fed
> has no chance. Fed does not generate the pace (except on his serve)
> needed to win points on this surface. BTW, I think Cahill is overrated.

If federer doesn't generate the speed required to win points on this
surface how did he manage to reach the QF? How did he manage to get
those 'decent' results on courts slower than the current one being
played on? The motivation for Federer to win this thing will be
enormous as he hears the 'expert' opinions of the ilk of Collins,
Cash, and Cahill.

What's with these guys who's names start with 'C'? I know Cahill
dislikes Federer, but the other two?


 
Date: 25 Jan 2009 23:18:51
From: Patrick Kehoe
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
On Jan 25, 10:36=A0pm, akamai <akamai.nak...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 11:39 pm, RahimAsif <RahimA...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 25, 11:36 pm, "wkhedr" <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > > This should please a Federer fan like you.
> > > Cahill knows it all, having Murray and Nadal won HC slams more than F=
ederer
> > > did :)
>
> > > "RahimAsif" <RahimA...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:73bda645-6e95-42c0-a773-12cbc1df98b1@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com.=
..
>
> > > > "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats th=
e
> > > > final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...
>
> > The reason I posted this is because I didn't like it, its
> > disrespectful to Fed. But Cahill is widely respected for his tennis
> > acumen...
>
> It does not need any special acumen for one to say they are the
> favourites. Anyone who can see Nadal play like this will see that Fed
> has no chance. Fed does not generate the pace (except on his serve)
> needed to win points on this surface. BTW, I think Cahill is overrated.

++ Oh! Feds not BAD on hard courts... not a bad record in slams on
HC...

P



 
Date: 25 Jan 2009 22:36:53
From: akamai
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
On Jan 25, 11:39 pm, RahimAsif <RahimA...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 25, 11:36 pm, "wkhedr" <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > This should please a Federer fan like you.
> > Cahill knows it all, having Murray and Nadal won HC slams more than Federer
> > did :)
>
> > "RahimAsif" <RahimA...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:73bda645-6e95-42c0-a773-12cbc1df98b1@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>
> > > "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
> > > final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...
>
> The reason I posted this is because I didn't like it, its
> disrespectful to Fed. But Cahill is widely respected for his tennis
> acumen...

It does not need any special acumen for one to say they are the
favourites. Anyone who can see Nadal play like this will see that Fed
has no chance. Fed does not generate the pace (except on his serve)
needed to win points on this surface. BTW, I think Cahill is overrated.


 
Date: 25 Jan 2009 21:39:13
From: RahimAsif
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
On Jan 25, 11:36=A0pm, "wkhedr" <wkh...@my-deja.com > wrote:
> This should please a Federer fan like you.
> Cahill knows it all, having Murray and Nadal won HC slams more than Feder=
er
> did :)
>
> "RahimAsif" <RahimA...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:73bda645-6e95-42c0-a773-12cbc1df98b1@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>
> > "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
> > final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...

The reason I posted this is because I didn't like it, its
disrespectful to Fed. But Cahill is widely respected for his tennis
acumen...


  
Date: 26 Jan 2009 20:16:53
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
RahimAsif wrote:
> On Jan 25, 11:36 pm, "wkhedr" <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> This should please a Federer fan like you.
>> Cahill knows it all, having Murray and Nadal won HC slams more than Federer
>> did :)
>>
>> "RahimAsif" <RahimA...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:73bda645-6e95-42c0-a773-12cbc1df98b1@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>> "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
>>> final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...
>
> The reason I posted this is because I didn't like it, its
> disrespectful to Fed. But Cahill is widely respected for his tennis
> acumen...


He's a little less respected now.



 
Date: 26 Jan 2009 00:36:13
From: wkhedr
Subject: Re: Darren Cahill
This should please a Federer fan like you.
Cahill knows it all, having Murray and Nadal won HC slams more than Federer
did :)

"RahimAsif" <RahimAsif@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:73bda645-6e95-42c0-a773-12cbc1df98b1@y1g2000pra.googlegroups.com...
> "Its a shame Nadal and Murray are in the same half because thats the
> final". Federer is almost becoming an afterthought...