tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 10 Feb 2009 22:10:41
From: jdeluise
Subject: Did Rafa benefit from a "clown era"?
Or is that reserved only for Federer?




 
Date: 10 Feb 2009 14:26:49
From: Raja
Subject: Re: Did Rafa benefit from a "clown era"?
On Feb 10, 4:10=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:
> Or is that reserved only for Federer?

Its a clown era for Fed because it has Nadal as his main rival
It is not clown era for Nadal because it has Fed as his main rival.

I dont think the Sampras trolls (masquerading as Nadal trolls) will be
able to use their brains to come with that explanation


  
Date: 10 Feb 2009 15:05:24
From:
Subject: Re: Did Rafa benefit from a "clown era"?
On Feb 10, 4:35=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 10-Feb-2009, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 10, 4:10=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Or is that reserved only for Federer?
>
> > Its a clown era for Fed because it has Nadal as his main rival
> > It is not clown era for Nadal because it has Fed as his main rival.
>
> > I dont think the Sampras trolls (masquerading as Nadal trolls) will be
> > able to use their brains to come with that explanation
>
> Sure they will... just don't expect it will make any logical sense :)

Rst is a nonsense paradise. It will make perfect sense to many
here ;-)



  
Date: 10 Feb 2009 22:35:16
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Did Rafa benefit from a "clown era"?

On 10-Feb-2009, Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com > wrote:

> On Feb 10, 4:10 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Or is that reserved only for Federer?
>
> Its a clown era for Fed because it has Nadal as his main rival
> It is not clown era for Nadal because it has Fed as his main rival.
>
> I dont think the Sampras trolls (masquerading as Nadal trolls) will be
> able to use their brains to come with that explanation

Sure they will... just don't expect it will make any logical sense :)