tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 11 Jan 2009 01:45:59
From: Fan
Subject: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
The past few months, Murray has been impressive but it is too early to
jump to conclusions. He seems to have matured and that is in his favor
but without winning a few slams, he could just another flash in the
pen. We hear very little of Djokovic lately, hardly a year after
Djokovic's mother declared the king Roger is dead.
Fortunately, no such foolishness is coming from the Murray camp and
for good reason.
What if Murray fails to win the Australian?




 
Date: 13 Jan 2009 09:30:55
From: Rodjk #613
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Jan 11, 6:43=A0pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com >
wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:12:01 -0800 (PST), "Rodjk #613"
>
>
>
> <rjka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On Jan 11, 11:55=A0am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 11, 6:09=A0pm, Giovanna <giovana...@bol.com.br> wrote:
>
> >> > > How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?
>
> >> > Fedfans don't say Rafa is a pedophile.....
>
> >> Only slime would try to slime these players.
>
> >> I respect Federer and Nadal and they respect each other. The last few
> >> weeks have not been too kind to either but it takes nothing from their
> >> incredible accomplishments.
>
> >Yes. As I just commented in direct response to Giovanna, it is amazing
> >that two class acts like Fed and Nadal have such low class fans.
>
> >Rodjk #613
>
> what do you mean "two" ?

I said two because I mean 'two'.
Federer and Nadal.
Both are class acts.
Some of their fans, unfortunately, are not.

Rodjk #613


  
Date: 14 Jan 2009 00:46:15
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:30:55 -0800 (PST), "Rodjk #613"
<rjkardo@gmail.com > wrote:

>On Jan 11, 6:43 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com>
>wrote:
>> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:12:01 -0800 (PST), "Rodjk #613"
>>
>>
>>
>> <rjka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On Jan 11, 11:55 am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Jan 11, 6:09 pm, Giovanna <giovana...@bol.com.br> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?
>>
>> >> > Fedfans don't say Rafa is a pedophile.....
>>
>> >> Only slime would try to slime these players.
>>
>> >> I respect Federer and Nadal and they respect each other. The last few
>> >> weeks have not been too kind to either but it takes nothing from their
>> >> incredible accomplishments.
>>
>> >Yes. As I just commented in direct response to Giovanna, it is amazing
>> >that two class acts like Fed and Nadal have such low class fans.
>>
>> >Rodjk #613
>>
>> what do you mean "two" ?
>
>I said two because I mean 'two'.
>Federer and Nadal.
>Both are class acts.
>Some of their fans, unfortunately, are not.
>
>Rodjk #613


how can a prolific ass picker be considered a class act unless you
like to eat shit ? do you ?


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 22:49:06
From: Fan
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Jan 12, 12:21=A0am, "Iceberg" <big_bad_iceb...@moc.oohay > wrote:
> "ca1houn" <vageta95...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
>
> news:8b6d0e2e-1608-4e91-99c9-b3c0d4e206b4@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 11, 1:45 am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > The past few months, Murray has been impressive but it is too early to
> > jump to conclusions. He seems to have matured and that is in his favor
> > but without winning a few slams, he could just another flash in the
> > pen. We hear very little of Djokovic lately, hardly a year after
> > Djokovic's mother declared the king Roger is dead.
> > Fortunately, no such foolishness is coming from the Murray camp and
> > for good reason.
> > What if Murray fails to win the Australian?
>
> >lol we are not getting excited; Murray need to =A0win a fucking slam
> >then maybe the world will give a fuck. =A0If he make it a Wimbledon
> >title then murray will be a very rich tennis player. the brit are
> >drying for that
>
> he's already rich.

Some people had the savvy to predict great things for Federer long
before he won his first slam. They were right.
Murray is very talented and he has matured a lot. If he is not
injured, he should do well. It would be pre-mature to say more than
that until he actually wins some slams.


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 11:33:26
From: ca1houn
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Jan 11, 1:45=A0am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> The past few months, Murray has been impressive but it is too early to
> jump to conclusions. He seems to have matured and that is in his favor
> but without winning a few slams, he could just another flash in the
> pen. We hear very little of Djokovic lately, hardly a year after
> Djokovic's mother declared the king Roger is dead.
> Fortunately, no such foolishness is coming from the Murray camp and
> for good reason.
> What if Murray fails to win the Australian?

lol we are not getting excited; Murray need to win a fucking slam
then maybe the world will give a fuck. If he make it a Wimbledon
title then murray will be a very rich tennis player. the brit are
drying for that



  
Date: 11 Jan 2009 23:21:33
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
"ca1houn" <vageta95521@yahoo.com > wrote in message
news:8b6d0e2e-1608-4e91-99c9-b3c0d4e206b4@z27g2000prd.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 11, 1:45 am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> The past few months, Murray has been impressive but it is too early to
> jump to conclusions. He seems to have matured and that is in his favor
> but without winning a few slams, he could just another flash in the
> pen. We hear very little of Djokovic lately, hardly a year after
> Djokovic's mother declared the king Roger is dead.
> Fortunately, no such foolishness is coming from the Murray camp and
> for good reason.
> What if Murray fails to win the Australian?
>
>lol we are not getting excited; Murray need to win a fucking slam
>then maybe the world will give a fuck. If he make it a Wimbledon
>title then murray will be a very rich tennis player. the brit are
>drying for that

he's already rich.




 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 10:12:01
From: Rodjk #613
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Jan 11, 11:55=A0am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 11, 6:09=A0pm, Giovanna <giovana...@bol.com.br> wrote:
>
> > > How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?
>
> > Fedfans don't say Rafa is a pedophile.....
>
> Only slime would try to slime these players.
>
> I respect Federer and Nadal and they respect each other. The last few
> weeks have not been too kind to either but it takes nothing from their
> incredible accomplishments.

Yes. As I just commented in direct response to Giovanna, it is amazing
that two class acts like Fed and Nadal have such low class fans.

Rodjk #613


  
Date: 12 Jan 2009 00:43:13
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:12:01 -0800 (PST), "Rodjk #613"
<rjkardo@gmail.com > wrote:

>On Jan 11, 11:55 am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 11, 6:09 pm, Giovanna <giovana...@bol.com.br> wrote:
>>
>> > > How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?
>>
>> > Fedfans don't say Rafa is a pedophile.....
>>
>> Only slime would try to slime these players.
>>
>> I respect Federer and Nadal and they respect each other. The last few
>> weeks have not been too kind to either but it takes nothing from their
>> incredible accomplishments.
>
>Yes. As I just commented in direct response to Giovanna, it is amazing
>that two class acts like Fed and Nadal have such low class fans.
>
>Rodjk #613


what do you mean "two" ?


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 10:11:10
From: Rodjk #613
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Jan 11, 11:09=A0am, Giovanna <giovana...@bol.com.br > wrote:
> > How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?
>
> Fedfans don't say Rafa is a pedophile.....

Hmmmm.
That is a good point, and kudos to you for bringing it up.
OTOH, that is a bit of damning with faint praise.
Fed fans here have called Nadal a lot of things, including cheater and
suggestions that he is gay.

Really, it amazes me that two such high class guys have such low class
fans.

NOTE: I am not specifically referring to Giovanna here, but to other
Fed Fans in this group.
Rodjk #613


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 09:55:08
From: Fan
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Jan 11, 6:09=A0pm, Giovanna <giovana...@bol.com.br > wrote:
> > How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?
>
> Fedfans don't say Rafa is a pedophile.....

Only slime would try to slime these players.

I respect Federer and Nadal and they respect each other. The last few
weeks have not been too kind to either but it takes nothing from their
incredible accomplishments.


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 09:09:00
From: Giovanna
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...


> How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?

Fedfans don't say Rafa is a pedophile.....


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 05:00:09
From: Fan
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Jan 11, 12:59=A0pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com >
wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:45:59 -0800 (PST), Fan
>
> <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >The past few months, Murray has been impressive but it is too early to
> >jump to conclusions. He seems to have matured and that is in his favor
> >but without winning a few slams, he could just another flash in the
> >pen. We hear very little of Djokovic lately, hardly a year after
> >Djokovic's mother declared the king Roger is dead.
> >Fortunately, no such foolishness is coming from the Murray camp and
> >for good reason.
> >What if Murray fails to win the Australian?
>
> That's ok as long as he kicks rafa's ass.

How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?


  
Date: 11 Jan 2009 14:45:51
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
"Fan" <TurnagainArm@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:2f658abf-0554-4c82-828d-d6a38d8cabaa@x16g2000prn.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 11, 12:59 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com >
wrote:
> On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:45:59 -0800 (PST), Fan
>
> <Turnagain...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >The past few months, Murray has been impressive but it is too early to
> >jump to conclusions. He seems to have matured and that is in his favor
> >but without winning a few slams, he could just another flash in the
> >pen. We hear very little of Djokovic lately, hardly a year after
> >Djokovic's mother declared the king Roger is dead.
> >Fortunately, no such foolishness is coming from the Murray camp and
> >for good reason.
> >What if Murray fails to win the Australian?
>
> That's ok as long as he kicks rafa's ass.
>
>How is a rafahater any better than a fedhater?

Fedfans are beyond reason and cannot be reasoned with.




 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 14:48:34
From: Sakari Lund
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:45:59 -0800 (PST), Fan
<TurnagainArm@hotmail.com > wrote:

>The past few months, Murray has been impressive but it is too early to
>jump to conclusions. He seems to have matured and that is in his favor
>but without winning a few slams, he could just another flash in the
>pen.

Or one slam.


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 11:59:53
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: Don't go nuts over Murray. Not just yet...
On Sun, 11 Jan 2009 01:45:59 -0800 (PST), Fan
<TurnagainArm@hotmail.com > wrote:

>The past few months, Murray has been impressive but it is too early to
>jump to conclusions. He seems to have matured and that is in his favor
>but without winning a few slams, he could just another flash in the
>pen. We hear very little of Djokovic lately, hardly a year after
>Djokovic's mother declared the king Roger is dead.
>Fortunately, no such foolishness is coming from the Murray camp and
>for good reason.
>What if Murray fails to win the Australian?


That's ok as long as he kicks rafa's ass.