tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 02 Jan 2009 18:14:50
From: TT
Subject: Federer's goal for 2009: 1 slam
ATP - ROGER LOSES FIRST MATCH

Andy Murray has beaten Roger 4-6, 6-2, 7-6(6) to reach the final of the
World Tennis Championship in Abu Dhabi. Roger won the first set but
Murray bounced back to complete the victory and set up a final against
Nikolay Davydenko or Rafael Nadal.

"It's been a great start but unfortunately I couldn't come through in
the end," said Roger. "But Andy's had a fantastic end to the year and he
looks in great shape again."
Roger was happy to get a hard match at the start of his season and,
despite last year not being his best, he would take the same again for
2009. "Hopefully I can just have another terrible year with only just
the one grand slam and that will be just fine."

http://www.rogerfederer.com/en/rogers/news/newsdetail.cfm?uNewsID=845




 
Date: 03 Jan 2009 08:54:49
From:
Subject: Re: Federer's goal for 2009: 1 slam
On Jan 3, 7:11=A0am, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
> > On Jan 2, 8:59 pm, Aranci...@selin.com wrote:
> >> Told you so. Federina will win 1 slam or no slams at all in 2009. He
> >> is in decline. Think Sampras in the early 2000s.
>
> > What about thinking Sampras in 1999?
>
> Think again.

Yup.


 
Date: 03 Jan 2009 04:10:22
From:
Subject: Re: Federer's goal for 2009: 1 slam
On Jan 2, 8:59=A0pm, Aranci...@selin.com wrote:
> Told you so. Federina will win 1 slam or no slams at all in 2009. He
> is in decline. Think Sampras in the early 2000s.

What about thinking Sampras in 1999?



  
Date: 03 Jan 2009 23:11:55
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Federer's goal for 2009: 1 slam
gregorawe@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 2, 8:59 pm, Aranci...@selin.com wrote:
>> Told you so. Federina will win 1 slam or no slams at all in 2009. He
>> is in decline. Think Sampras in the early 2000s.
>
> What about thinking Sampras in 1999?
>



Think again.



 
Date: 02 Jan 2009 16:21:51
From: GOAT
Subject: Re: Federer's goal for 2009: 1 slam
On Jan 2, 8:59=A0pm, Aranci...@selin.com wrote:
> Told you so. Federina will win 1 slam or no slams at all in 2009. He
> is in decline. Think Sampras in the early 2000s.

Will be a struggle to match Pete, no way will he beat him.


  
Date: 03 Jan 2009 01:07:20
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: Federer's goal for 2009: 1 slam
On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:21:51 -0800 (PST), GOAT
<thetruetennisgoat@hotmail.co.uk > wrote:

>On Jan 2, 8:59 pm, Aranci...@selin.com wrote:
>> Told you so. Federina will win 1 slam or no slams at all in 2009. He
>> is in decline. Think Sampras in the early 2000s.
>
>Will be a struggle to match Pete, no way will he beat him.


ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

he already has.


   
Date: 03 Jan 2009 10:12:58
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Federer's goal for 2009: 1 slam
"Dave Hazelwood" <the_big_kahuna@mailcity.com > wrote in message
news:bhetl4tj9375gqakjhrcu2pl0f8s77cj2a@4ax.com...
> On Fri, 2 Jan 2009 16:21:51 -0800 (PST), GOAT
> <thetruetennisgoat@hotmail.co.uk> wrote:
>
>>On Jan 2, 8:59 pm, Aranci...@selin.com wrote:
>>> Told you so. Federina will win 1 slam or no slams at all in 2009. He
>>> is in decline. Think Sampras in the early 2000s.
>>
>>Will be a struggle to match Pete, no way will he beat him.
>
>
> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>
> he already has.

no he hasn't and the GOAT thing is out the window as of 1st Jan 2009.




 
Date: 02 Jan 2009 12:59:20
From:
Subject: Re: Federer's goal for 2009: 1 slam
Told you so. Federina will win 1 slam or no slams at all in 2009. He
is in decline. Think Sampras in the early 2000s.