tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 11 Jan 2009 22:12:34
From: TT
Subject: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
Few days ago, after Gulbis beating Djokovic, I said:

"Gulbis is a dangerous opponent on fast surfaces...but a non-entity when
it becomes to winning tms+ events.

Huge serve+forehand - poor mentality, consistency and backhand. Will
still improve though.
I'd rather watch more closely Cilic."

...And the very next day Gulbis loses and Cilic goes and wins Chennai.
Not bad, no?




 
Date: 12 Jan 2009 08:16:57
From: Raja
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
On Jan 11, 4:50=A0pm, VJ <jayacha...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 11, 4:16=A0pm, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > DavidW wrote:
> > > TT wrote:
> > >> Few days ago, after Gulbis beating Djokovic, I said:
>
> > >> "Gulbis is a dangerous opponent on fast surfaces...but a non-entity
> > >> when it becomes to winning tms+ events.
>
> > >> Huge serve+forehand - poor mentality, consistency and backhand. Will
> > >> still improve though.
> > >> I'd rather watch more closely Cilic."
>
> > >> ...And the very next day Gulbis loses and Cilic goes and wins Chenna=
i.
> > >> Not bad, no?
>
> > > Certainly not good enough to deserve its own thread, let alone two.
>
> > That good eh...
>
> > --
> > "Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
> > singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"- H=
ide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> If we consider Whisper as Tier 1, you're right up there with him.- Hide q=
uoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

ROFLMAO. That was fucking funny.


 
Date: 12 Jan 2009 08:05:05
From: Giovanna
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?

> Certainly not good enough to deserve its own thread, let alone two.

lol

yes~~


 
Date: 12 Jan 2009 02:53:46
From: Joubert
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
The whole world knows Gulbis' best shot is his backhand. His forehand
can be more powerful but it is way more erratic. You're great for a
fuckhead tho'.


  
Date: 12 Jan 2009 06:56:27
From: TT
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
Joubert wrote:
> The whole world knows Gulbis' best shot is his backhand. His forehand
> can be more powerful but it is way more erratic. You're great for a
> fuckhead tho'.

So in short you're telling us that you're a dick.


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 17:37:49
From: ca1houn
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
On Jan 11, 12:12=A0pm, TT <g...@Olympics.org > wrote:
> Few days ago, after Gulbis beating Djokovic, I said:
>
> "Gulbis is a dangerous opponent on fast surfaces...but a non-entity when
> it becomes to winning tms+ events.
>
> Huge serve+forehand - poor mentality, consistency and backhand. Will
> still improve though.
> I'd rather watch more closely Cilic."
>
> ...And the very next day Gulbis loses and Cilic goes and wins Chennai.
> Not bad, no?

shit like all off the other tier 1 comment


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 15:17:50
From: arnab.z@gmail
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
On 12 Jan., 02:50, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided > wrote:
> TT wrote:
> > Few days ago, after Gulbis beating Djokovic, I said:
>
> > "Gulbis is a dangerous opponent on fast surfaces...but a non-entity
> > when it becomes to winning tms+ events.
>
> > Huge serve+forehand - poor mentality, consistency and backhand. Will
> > still improve though.
> > I'd rather watch more closely Cilic."
>
> > ...And the very next day Gulbis loses and Cilic goes and wins Chennai.
> > Not bad, no?
>
> Certainly not good enough to deserve its own thread, let alone two.

Cilic won against Somdev, a rookie with no big weapons.

Who did Gulbis lose to?


 
Date: 11 Jan 2009 14:50:55
From: VJ
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
On Jan 11, 4:16=A0pm, TT <g...@Olympics.org > wrote:
> DavidW wrote:
> > TT wrote:
> >> Few days ago, after Gulbis beating Djokovic, I said:
>
> >> "Gulbis is a dangerous opponent on fast surfaces...but a non-entity
> >> when it becomes to winning tms+ events.
>
> >> Huge serve+forehand - poor mentality, consistency and backhand. Will
> >> still improve though.
> >> I'd rather watch more closely Cilic."
>
> >> ...And the very next day Gulbis loses and Cilic goes and wins Chennai.
> >> Not bad, no?
>
> > Certainly not good enough to deserve its own thread, let alone two.
>
> That good eh...
>
> --
> "Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
> singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"- Hid=
e quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

If we consider Whisper as Tier 1, you're right up there with him.


 
Date: 12 Jan 2009 07:50:31
From: DavidW
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
TT wrote:
> Few days ago, after Gulbis beating Djokovic, I said:
>
> "Gulbis is a dangerous opponent on fast surfaces...but a non-entity
> when it becomes to winning tms+ events.
>
> Huge serve+forehand - poor mentality, consistency and backhand. Will
> still improve though.
> I'd rather watch more closely Cilic."
>
> ...And the very next day Gulbis loses and Cilic goes and wins Chennai.
> Not bad, no?

Certainly not good enough to deserve its own thread, let alone two.




  
Date: 11 Jan 2009 23:16:48
From: TT
Subject: Re: How is this for a tier 1 analysis?
DavidW wrote:
> TT wrote:
>> Few days ago, after Gulbis beating Djokovic, I said:
>>
>> "Gulbis is a dangerous opponent on fast surfaces...but a non-entity
>> when it becomes to winning tms+ events.
>>
>> Huge serve+forehand - poor mentality, consistency and backhand. Will
>> still improve though.
>> I'd rather watch more closely Cilic."
>>
>> ...And the very next day Gulbis loses and Cilic goes and wins Chennai.
>> Not bad, no?
>
> Certainly not good enough to deserve its own thread, let alone two.
>
>

That good eh...

--
"Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"