tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 02 Feb 2009 16:11:34
From: TT
Subject: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed lost
Mono




 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 12:16:40
From:
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
On Feb 2, 9:55=A0am, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com > wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:51=A0am, Lax <Lax.Cla...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 2, 9:46=A0am, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 2, 9:11=A0am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>
> > > > Mono
>
> > > He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
> > > year and last year, and you know it.
>
> > Yes. Movement was much better.
>
> > His serve let him down and his shots were too spinny and short (not
> > like last 2 rounds of USO).
>
> > BUT Nadal wasn't playing well either. =A0If Nadal weren't weary he woud=
l
> > have beaten Fed regardless of the serve clicking or not.
>
> This Nadal weary story makes no sense.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Check out his post-match comments.


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 07:58:36
From: Lax
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
On Feb 2, 10:45=A0am, TT <g...@Olympics.org > wrote:
> Lax wrote:
> > On Feb 2, 10:05 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
> >> wkhedr wrote:
> >>> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
> >>>> Mono
> >>> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
> >>> year and last year, and you know it.
> >> Ah ok. So when did Fed's mono end exactly?
>
> > March 24, 2008.
> > Stop asking dumb questions. =A0It's clear you know nothing about mono.
>
> Well I was just wondering since you were talking about "last
> year"...shouldn't it have ended December 31st 2008 then?
>

Wkhedr mentioned "last year" not me.

He was comparing Fed at AO2008 with Fed at AO2009. I understood what
he meant and back him up by saying Fed's movement was way better this
AO.

What's with you and specific dates? You want a ceritificate from Fed
stating the period he had mono?


  
Date: 02 Feb 2009 18:01:43
From: TT
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
Lax wrote:
> On Feb 2, 10:45 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>> Lax wrote:
>>> On Feb 2, 10:05 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>>>> wkhedr wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>>>>>> Mono
>>>>> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
>>>>> year and last year, and you know it.
>>>> Ah ok. So when did Fed's mono end exactly?
>>> March 24, 2008.
>>> Stop asking dumb questions. It's clear you know nothing about mono.
>> Well I was just wondering since you were talking about "last
>> year"...shouldn't it have ended December 31st 2008 then?
>>
>
> Wkhedr mentioned "last year" not me.
>
> He was comparing Fed at AO2008 with Fed at AO2009. I understood what
> he meant and back him up by saying Fed's movement was way better this
> AO.
>
> What's with you and specific dates? You want a ceritificate from Fed
> stating the period he had mono?

That would be nice if all his rst fanboys signed it as well.

--
"Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 07:35:38
From: Lax
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
On Feb 2, 10:05=A0am, TT <g...@Olympics.org > wrote:
> wkhedr wrote:
> > On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
> >> Mono
>
> > He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
> > year and last year, and you know it.
>
> Ah ok. So when did Fed's mono end exactly?
>

March 24, 2008.
Stop asking dumb questions. It's clear you know nothing about mono.


  
Date: 02 Feb 2009 17:45:20
From: TT
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
Lax wrote:
> On Feb 2, 10:05 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>> wkhedr wrote:
>>> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>>>> Mono
>>> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
>>> year and last year, and you know it.
>> Ah ok. So when did Fed's mono end exactly?
>>
>
> March 24, 2008.
> Stop asking dumb questions. It's clear you know nothing about mono.

Well I was just wondering since you were talking about "last
year"...shouldn't it have ended December 31st 2008 then?

--
"Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 06:55:00
From: wkhedr
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
On Feb 2, 9:51=A0am, Lax <Lax.Cla...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:46=A0am, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 2, 9:11=A0am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>
> > > Mono
>
> > He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
> > year and last year, and you know it.
>
> Yes. Movement was much better.
>
> His serve let him down and his shots were too spinny and short (not
> like last 2 rounds of USO).
>
> BUT Nadal wasn't playing well either. =A0If Nadal weren't weary he woudl
> have beaten Fed regardless of the serve clicking or not.

This Nadal weary story makes no sense.


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 06:51:39
From: Lax
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
On Feb 2, 9:46=A0am, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com > wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:11=A0am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>
> > Mono
>
> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
> year and last year, and you know it.

Yes. Movement was much better.

His serve let him down and his shots were too spinny and short (not
like last 2 rounds of USO).

BUT Nadal wasn't playing well either. If Nadal weren't weary he woudl
have beaten Fed regardless of the serve clicking or not.



  
Date: 03 Feb 2009 02:33:31
From: john
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed lost

"Lax" <Lax.Clarke@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:fe7daf10-155c-4550-a83d-cfcf928f70f4@m15g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
On Feb 2, 9:46 am, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com > wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>
> > Mono
>
> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
> year and last year, and you know it.

Yes. Movement was much better.

His serve let him down and his shots were too spinny and short (not
like last 2 rounds of USO).

BUT Nadal wasn't playing well either. If Nadal weren't weary he woudl
have beaten Fed regardless of the serve clicking or not.

Nadal certainly was not weary and you are just stupid to believe that type
of
rubbish. Nadal was playing well and if had slip up in those important
moment
of the match Federer would have gone away with a four set victory.
Federer's
serve certainly let him down and he would have won if his serve was
clicking.




   
Date: 02 Feb 2009 17:40:43
From: TT
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
john wrote:
> "Lax" <Lax.Clarke@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:fe7daf10-155c-4550-a83d-cfcf928f70f4@m15g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 2, 9:46 am, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>>
>>> Mono
>> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
>> year and last year, and you know it.
>
> Yes. Movement was much better.
>
> His serve let him down and his shots were too spinny and short (not
> like last 2 rounds of USO).
>
> BUT Nadal wasn't playing well either. If Nadal weren't weary he woudl
> have beaten Fed regardless of the serve clicking or not.
>
> Nadal certainly was not weary and you are just stupid to believe that type
> of
> rubbish. Nadal was playing well and if had slip up in those important
> moment
> of the match Federer would have gone away with a four set victory.
> Federer's
> serve certainly let him down and he would have won if his serve was
> clicking.
>
>

Typical fedfucker drivel...

--
"Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"


    
Date: 03 Feb 2009 07:10:02
From: john
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed lost

"TT" <gold@Olympics.org > wrote in message
news:2uEhl.127660$_03.112721@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> john wrote:
>> "Lax" <Lax.Clarke@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:fe7daf10-155c-4550-a83d-cfcf928f70f4@m15g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
>> On Feb 2, 9:46 am, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Mono
>>> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
>>> year and last year, and you know it.
>>
>> Yes. Movement was much better.
>>
>> His serve let him down and his shots were too spinny and short (not
>> like last 2 rounds of USO).
>>
>> BUT Nadal wasn't playing well either. If Nadal weren't weary he woudl
>> have beaten Fed regardless of the serve clicking or not.
>>
>> Nadal certainly was not weary and you are just stupid to believe that
>> type of
>> rubbish. Nadal was playing well and if had slip up in those important
>> moment
>> of the match Federer would have gone away with a four set victory.
>> Federer's
>> serve certainly let him down and he would have won if his serve was
>> clicking.
>>
>>
>
> Typical fedfucker drivel...

As expect not much of analysis from a typical Nadal fucker and biggest troll
in RST.
>
> --
> "Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
> singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"




     
Date: 03 Feb 2009 03:26:34
From: TT
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
john wrote:
> "TT" <gold@Olympics.org> wrote in message
> news:2uEhl.127660$_03.112721@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>> john wrote:
>>> "Lax" <Lax.Clarke@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:fe7daf10-155c-4550-a83d-cfcf928f70f4@m15g2000vbp.googlegroups.com...
>>> On Feb 2, 9:46 am, wkhedr <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Mono
>>>> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
>>>> year and last year, and you know it.
>>> Yes. Movement was much better.
>>>
>>> His serve let him down and his shots were too spinny and short (not
>>> like last 2 rounds of USO).
>>>
>>> BUT Nadal wasn't playing well either. If Nadal weren't weary he woudl
>>> have beaten Fed regardless of the serve clicking or not.
>>>
>>> Nadal certainly was not weary and you are just stupid to believe that
>>> type of
>>> rubbish. Nadal was playing well and if had slip up in those important
>>> moment
>>> of the match Federer would have gone away with a four set victory.
>>> Federer's
>>> serve certainly let him down and he would have won if his serve was
>>> clicking.
>>>
>>>
>> Typical fedfucker drivel...
>
> As expect not much of analysis from a typical Nadal fucker and biggest troll
> in RST.

It's "John" again, the venomous stalker of rst...

--
"Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 06:46:17
From: wkhedr
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
On Feb 2, 9:11=A0am, TT <g...@Olympics.org > wrote:
> Mono

He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
year and last year, and you know it.


  
Date: 02 Feb 2009 17:05:44
From: TT
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
wkhedr wrote:
> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>> Mono
>
> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
> year and last year, and you know it.

Ah ok. So when did Fed's mono end exactly?

Surely he had it at FO and will show this year how he plays when healthy?
Must have had it in Olympics too, losing to Blake.

I hear he had some back problems at YEC, did he have mono also?


   
Date: 03 Feb 2009 02:35:30
From: john
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed lost

"TT" <gold@Olympics.org > wrote in message
news:fZDhl.127638$_03.99823@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
> wkhedr wrote:
>> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>>> Mono
>>
>> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
>> year and last year, and you know it.
>
> Ah ok. So when did Fed's mono end exactly?
>
> Surely he had it at FO and will show this year how he plays when healthy?
> Must have had it in Olympics too, losing to Blake.
>
> I hear he had some back problems at YEC, did he have mono also?

What was Nadal's reason not turning up for YEC ? Because they don't have
the magic fish in China or they don't have qualified chemist to make the
Nadal
cocktail ?




    
Date: 02 Feb 2009 17:43:34
From: TT
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
john wrote:
> "TT" <gold@Olympics.org> wrote in message
> news:fZDhl.127638$_03.99823@reader1.news.saunalahti.fi...
>> wkhedr wrote:
>>> On Feb 2, 9:11 am, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>>>> Mono
>>> He was healthy and athletic this year. Huge difference between this
>>> year and last year, and you know it.
>> Ah ok. So when did Fed's mono end exactly?
>>
>> Surely he had it at FO and will show this year how he plays when healthy?
>> Must have had it in Olympics too, losing to Blake.
>>
>> I hear he had some back problems at YEC, did he have mono also?
>
> What was Nadal's reason not turning up for YEC ? Because they don't have
> the magic fish in China or they don't have qualified chemist to make the
> Nadal
> cocktail ?
>
>

Ah it's the sore LOSER "John" accusing Nadal of doping.

AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH
HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH
HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA
HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH
AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH LOL LOL LOL LOLAH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH
HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH
HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA
HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH
HAH HAH HA HAH AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH
AH HAH HA HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HAH HA HAH ! :)

--
"Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 06:45:43
From:
Subject: Re: I'm disappointed that nobody spotted the obvious reason why Fed
On Feb 2, 9:11=A0am, TT <g...@Olympics.org > wrote:
> Mono

It took you a day and a half to come up with that quip? I'm
disappointed in *you*, Spartan-boy!