tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 21 Jan 2009 22:43:51
From: jdeluise
Subject: January posting
According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month, and about
a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. Will we catch
up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? It seems to me it comes down
to what happens with Fed....




 
Date: 21 Jan 2009 15:04:37
From: andrew.reys@gmail.com
Subject: Re: January posting
On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:
> According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month, and about
> a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. Will we catch
> up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? It seems to me it comes down
> to what happens with Fed....

Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
nothing to worry about.


  
Date: 05 Feb 2009 01:07:30
From: arnab.z@gmail
Subject: Re: January posting
On Feb 5, 7:49=A0am, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On =A04-Feb-2009, Sao Paulo Swallow <Sao_Paulo_Swal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 4, 5:35=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.r...@gmail.com" <andrew.r...@gmail.com> wrote=
:
>
> > > > On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month=
,
> > > > > and
> > > > > about
> > > > > a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. =A0Wi=
ll we
> > > > > catch
> > > > > up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? =A0It seems to me i=
t
> > > > > comes
> > > > > down
> > > > > to what happens with Fed....
>
> > > > Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
> > > > given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
> > > > nothing to worry about.
>
> > > Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared with
> > > 13,772
> > > last January and 13,460 for two years ago.
>
> > Well, since it's Feb. 4 already how are we gonna catch up?
>
> Based on the Feb. posting quantity so far we would have surpassed last ye=
ars
> result had the AO finished earlier in the month like it did last year (en=
ded
> 1/27 last year).

That's wonderful to know.

What do you think about the quality? Has it changed compared to last
year or the year before?


   
Date: 05 Feb 2009 18:41:55
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: January posting

On 5-Feb-2009, "arnab.z@gmail" <arnab.zaheen@gmail.com > wrote:

> On Feb 5, 7:49 am, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On  4-Feb-2009, Sao Paulo Swallow <Sao_Paulo_Swal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Feb 4, 5:35 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.r...@gmail.com" <andrew.r...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this
> > > > >month,
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > about
> > > > > > a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood.
> > > > > Will we
> > > > > > catch
> > > > > > up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts?  It seems to me it
> > > > > > comes
> > > > > > down
> > > > > > to what happens with Fed....
> >
> > > > > Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes,
> > > > >and
> > > > > given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
> > > > > nothing to worry about.
> >
> > > > Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared
> > > > with
> > > > 13,772
> > > > last January and 13,460 for two years ago.
> >
> > > Well, since it's Feb. 4 already how are we gonna catch up?
> >
> > Based on the Feb. posting quantity so far we would have surpassed last
> > years
> > result had the AO finished earlier in the month like it did last year
> > (ended
> > 1/27 last year).
>
> That's wonderful to know.
>
> What do you think about the quality? Has it changed compared to last
> year or the year before?

A lot of people on your killfile aren't posting here anymore or with very
much regularity so I would think you would be happy. Are you proposing that
all rst denizens get your stamp of approval before posting?


   
Date: 05 Feb 2009 22:41:54
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: January posting
arnab.z@gmail wrote:
> On Feb 5, 7:49 am, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 4-Feb-2009, Sao Paulo Swallow <Sao_Paulo_Swal...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 5:35 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.r...@gmail.com" <andrew.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month,
>>>>>> and
>>>>>> about
>>>>>> a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. Will we
>>>>>> catch
>>>>>> up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? It seems to me it
>>>>>> comes
>>>>>> down
>>>>>> to what happens with Fed....
>>>>> Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
>>>>> given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
>>>>> nothing to worry about.
>>>> Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared with
>>>> 13,772
>>>> last January and 13,460 for two years ago.
>>> Well, since it's Feb. 4 already how are we gonna catch up?
>> Based on the Feb. posting quantity so far we would have surpassed last years
>> result had the AO finished earlier in the month like it did last year (ended
>> 1/27 last year).
>
> That's wonderful to know.
>
> What do you think about the quality? Has it changed compared to last
> year or the year before?


The ratio was higher just before this post.


  
Date: 04 Feb 2009 17:45:07
From: Sao Paulo Swallow
Subject: Re: January posting
On Feb 4, 5:35=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.r...@gmail.com" <andrew.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month, an=
d
> > > about
> > > a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. =A0Will w=
e
> > > catch
> > > up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? =A0It seems to me it co=
mes
> > > down
> > > to what happens with Fed....
>
> > Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
> > given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
> > nothing to worry about.
>
> Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared with 13,=
772
> last January and 13,460 for two years ago.

Well, since it's Feb. 4 already how are we gonna catch up?


   
Date: 05 Feb 2009 01:49:13
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: January posting

On 4-Feb-2009, Sao Paulo Swallow <Sao_Paulo_Swallow@yahoo.com > wrote:

> On Feb 4, 5:35 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.r...@gmail.com" <andrew.r...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month,
> > > > and
> > > > about
> > > > a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood.  Will we
> > > > catch
> > > > up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts?  It seems to me it
> > > > comes
> > > > down
> > > > to what happens with Fed....
> >
> > > Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
> > > given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
> > > nothing to worry about.
> >
> > Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared with
> > 13,772
> > last January and 13,460 for two years ago.
>
> Well, since it's Feb. 4 already how are we gonna catch up?

Based on the Feb. posting quantity so far we would have surpassed last years
result had the AO finished earlier in the month like it did last year (ended
1/27 last year).


  
Date: 05 Feb 2009 01:35:58
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: January posting

On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.reys@gmail.com" <andrew.reys@gmail.com > wrote:

> On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month, and
> > about
> > a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. Will we
> > catch
> > up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? It seems to me it comes
> > down
> > to what happens with Fed....
>
> Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
> given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
> nothing to worry about.

Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared with 13,772
last January and 13,460 for two years ago.


   
Date: 05 Feb 2009 23:57:45
From: Sakari Lund
Subject: Re: January posting
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:35:58 GMT, "jdeluise" <jdeluise@gmail.com >
wrote:

>
>On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.reys@gmail.com" <andrew.reys@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month, and
>> > about
>> > a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. Will we
>> > catch
>> > up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? It seems to me it comes
>> > down
>> > to what happens with Fed....
>>
>> Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
>> given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
>> nothing to worry about.
>
>Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared with 13,772
>last January and 13,460 for two years ago.

AO men's final was on Feb 1. I think it was in January last two years,
so that makes a big difference.


   
Date: 05 Feb 2009 11:31:25
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: January posting
On Thu, 5 Feb 2009 01:35:58 GMT, "jdeluise" <jdeluise@gmail.com >
wrote:

>
>On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.reys@gmail.com" <andrew.reys@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month, and
>> > about
>> > a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. Will we
>> > catch
>> > up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? It seems to me it comes
>> > down
>> > to what happens with Fed....
>>
>> Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
>> given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
>> nothing to worry about.
>
>Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared with 13,772
>last January and 13,460 for two years ago.


and why is that important ? quality trumps quantity right ?


   
Date: 05 Feb 2009 03:07:16
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: January posting

"jdeluise" <jdeluise@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:doril.6076$Bk7.1680@newsfe02.iad...
>
> On 21-Jan-2009, "andrew.reys@gmail.com" <andrew.reys@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month, and
>> > about
>> > a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. Will we
>> > catch
>> > up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? It seems to me it comes
>> > down
>> > to what happens with Fed....
>>
>> Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
>> given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
>> nothing to worry about.
>
> Well we only managed 12,771 posts for January this year compared with
> 13,772
> last January and 13,460 for two years ago.


Tragic




  
Date: 21 Jan 2009 18:06:00
From: mimus
Subject: Re: January posting
On Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:04:37 -0800, andrew.reys@gmail.com wrote:

> On Jan 21, 2:43 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> According to GG, only 5760 posts have been made so far this month, and about
>> a quarter of them are from Whisper, TJT and Dave Hazelwood. Will we catch
>> up to the last year's record of 13,772 posts? It seems to me it comes down
>> to what happens with Fed....
>
> Posting activity is always lower during the season's downtimes, and
> given that the AO just started a few days ago, I think you have
> nothing to worry about.

We're getting a lot of post-age outa the Dokic story, anyway.

--

Take a deep breath, take a walk, cool off, plot a bit, and serve again.