tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 10 Jan 2009 00:19:57
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Nothing to do at all with mono !


it's just psychology.

Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.




 
Date: 09 Jan 2009 22:52:03
From: Fan
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 10, 1:19=A0am, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com >
wrote:
> it's just psychology.
>
> Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.

I think Federer is not healthy. He used to be much, much better.


  
Date: 10 Jan 2009 08:09:42
From:
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 10, 1:52=A0am, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 10, 1:19=A0am, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com>
> wrote:
>
> > it's just psychology.
>
> > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
>
> I think Federer is not healthy. He used to be much, much better.

He used to be younger too. He used to be in his prime too.


  
Date: 10 Jan 2009 02:29:59
From: kaennorsing
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On 10 jan, 07:52, Fan <Turnagain...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 10, 1:19=A0am, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com>
> wrote:
>
> > it's just psychology.
>
> > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
>
> I think Federer is not healthy. He used to be much, much better.

I thought he was trying to move up to another level against
Kohlschreiber and looked horrible at times. His form (footwork) looked
better against Murray. He was willing to play aggressively and take
chances, moving to the net many times and with good percentages.

Beside getting beat by Murray his game looks to be shaping up ok for
the AO.


 
Date: 09 Jan 2009 22:00:32
From: drew
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 9, 7:19=A0pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com > wrote:
> it's just psychology.
>
> Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.

That entirely possible.

It is a strategy that was used with success by Sampras against
Agassi. Sampras saved his best for the majors and gave professional
efforts at the other events.


There's no doubt that Federer is stronger mentally than Murray at this
point. Murray hasn't won a major yet and when it mattered, Federer
took him to the cleaners so we'll see.

There's a good chance that after a quick start, Murray will be
physically low for the AO. He's got back pain now and that's not a
good sign.

Of course with Murray, he's always injured so you can't read much into
this either.


 
Date: 09 Jan 2009 17:03:37
From: Jason Catlin
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 9, 7:19=A0pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com > wrote:
> it's just psychology.
>
> Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.

This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's what
Pete did to Andre
in 1995, set him up for the *fall*

Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
enough when it really
mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
it took him a couple of years
to recover from.


  
Date: 10 Jan 2009 07:41:04
From:
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 10, 2:37=A0pm, Sakari Lund <sakari.l...@welho.com > wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:37:44 -0800 (PST), gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
> >On Jan 10, 3:36=A0am, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Jan 9, 10:30=A0pm, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
> >> > On Jan 10, 2:54=A0am, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > On Jan 9, 9:30=A0pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >> > > >news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroup=
s.com...
> >> > > > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com> =
wrote:
>
> >> > > > > it's just psychology.
>
> >> > > > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> >> > > > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. Th=
at's what
>
> >> > > > Pete did to Andre
> >> > > > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
>
> >> > > > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but s=
ure
> >> > > > enough when it really
> >> > > > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tail=
spin
> >> > > > it took him a couple of years
> >> > > > to recover from.
>
> >> > > > <<<<<
>
> >> > > > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too o=
ld and is
> >> > > > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
>
> >> > > Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon =
but
> >> > > he clearly looked like the
> >> > > best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad =
he
> >> > > got injured and couldn't play.
>
> >> > Can you believe Sampras didn't even *play* the AO in 1999? He took a
> >> > break due to fatigue after finishing YE #1 for the 6th time.
>
> >> > Can you imagine Federer not bothering to play this year's AO?- Hide =
quoted text -
>
> >> > - Show quoted text -
>
> >> Well, Pete did play a bunch of rinky dink tournies at the end of 98
> >> IIRC so maybe he was just
> >> mentally spent and thought he needed a lengthy break to recharge his
> >> batteries. And AO's so
> >> brutally hot and that was never his best Slam anyway. In retrospect it
> >> was a mistake not to play
> >> considering how close Fed is.
>
> >> Do you remember Kafelnikov thanked Pete for not playing in his speech
> >> after the final? LOL
>
> >Your reasons why he didn't play are spot on.
>
> >But it seems hard to believe that it would happen now.
>
> So that YE#1 was more important for him than another slam?

Well, Sampras only had 11 slams at the time, was still short of
Emerson's record.

He must have reckoned that he could still win another couple of slams
without worrying about the AO.



  
Date: 09 Jan 2009 19:37:44
From:
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 10, 3:36=A0am, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 9, 10:30=A0pm, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Jan 10, 2:54=A0am, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Jan 9, 9:30=A0pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > > >news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.c=
om...
> > > > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com> wro=
te:
>
> > > > > it's just psychology.
>
> > > > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> > > > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That'=
s what
>
> > > > Pete did to Andre
> > > > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
>
> > > > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
> > > > enough when it really
> > > > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspi=
n
> > > > it took him a couple of years
> > > > to recover from.
>
> > > > <<<<<
>
> > > > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old =
and is
> > > > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
>
> > > Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon but
> > > he clearly looked like the
> > > best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad he
> > > got injured and couldn't play.
>
> > Can you believe Sampras didn't even *play* the AO in 1999? He took a
> > break due to fatigue after finishing YE #1 for the 6th time.
>
> > Can you imagine Federer not bothering to play this year's AO?- Hide quo=
ted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -
>
> Well, Pete did play a bunch of rinky dink tournies at the end of 98
> IIRC so maybe he was just
> mentally spent and thought he needed a lengthy break to recharge his
> batteries. And AO's so
> brutally hot and that was never his best Slam anyway. In retrospect it
> was a mistake not to play
> considering how close Fed is.
>
> Do you remember Kafelnikov thanked Pete for not playing in his speech
> after the final? LOL

Your reasons why he didn't play are spot on.

But it seems hard to believe that it would happen now.



   
Date: 10 Jan 2009 16:37:54
From: Sakari Lund
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:37:44 -0800 (PST), gregorawe@hotmail.com wrote:

>On Jan 10, 3:36 am, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Jan 9, 10:30 pm, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Jan 10, 2:54 am, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > On Jan 9, 9:30 pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> > > >news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
>> > > > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > it's just psychology.
>>
>> > > > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
>> > > > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's what
>>
>> > > > Pete did to Andre
>> > > > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
>>
>> > > > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
>> > > > enough when it really
>> > > > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
>> > > > it took him a couple of years
>> > > > to recover from.
>>
>> > > > <<<<<
>>
>> > > > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old and is
>> > > > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
>>
>> > > Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon but
>> > > he clearly looked like the
>> > > best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad he
>> > > got injured and couldn't play.
>>
>> > Can you believe Sampras didn't even *play* the AO in 1999? He took a
>> > break due to fatigue after finishing YE #1 for the 6th time.
>>
>> > Can you imagine Federer not bothering to play this year's AO?- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> > - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Well, Pete did play a bunch of rinky dink tournies at the end of 98
>> IIRC so maybe he was just
>> mentally spent and thought he needed a lengthy break to recharge his
>> batteries. And AO's so
>> brutally hot and that was never his best Slam anyway. In retrospect it
>> was a mistake not to play
>> considering how close Fed is.
>>
>> Do you remember Kafelnikov thanked Pete for not playing in his speech
>> after the final? LOL
>
>Your reasons why he didn't play are spot on.
>
>But it seems hard to believe that it would happen now.

So that YE#1 was more important for him than another slam?


  
Date: 09 Jan 2009 19:36:59
From: Jason Catlin
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 9, 10:22=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On =A09-Jan-2009, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 9:56=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On =A09-Jan-2009, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 9, 9:30=A0pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
> > > > > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.=
googlegroups.com...
> > > > > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com>
> > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > it's just psychology.
>
> > > > > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> > > > > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. Tha=
t's
> > > > > >>>>what
>
> > > > > Pete did to Andre
> > > > > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
>
> > > > > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but su=
re
> > > > > enough when it really
> > > > > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tails=
pin
> > > > > it took him a couple of years
> > > > > to recover from.
>
> > > > > <<<<<
>
> > > > > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too ol=
d
> > > > > and
> > > > > is
> > > > > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
>
> > > > Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon b=
ut
> > > > he clearly looked like the
> > > > best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad h=
e
> > > > got injured and couldn't play.
>
> > > Did he now....-
>
> > Of course. Look it up.
>
> I don't think I can look up anything for 2009 yet..:)-

Yes, that would take some *Tier 1* skills to do that :)


  
Date: 09 Jan 2009 19:36:03
From: Jason Catlin
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 9, 10:30=A0pm, gregor...@hotmail.com wrote:
> On Jan 10, 2:54=A0am, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 9:30=A0pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
>
> > > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.com=
...
> > > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com> wrote=
:
>
> > > > it's just psychology.
>
> > > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> > > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's =
what
>
> > > Pete did to Andre
> > > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
>
> > > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
> > > enough when it really
> > > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
> > > it took him a couple of years
> > > to recover from.
>
> > > <<<<<
>
> > > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old an=
d is
> > > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
>
> > Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon but
> > he clearly looked like the
> > best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad he
> > got injured and couldn't play.
>
> Can you believe Sampras didn't even *play* the AO in 1999? He took a
> break due to fatigue after finishing YE #1 for the 6th time.
>
> Can you imagine Federer not bothering to play this year's AO?- Hide quote=
d text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Well, Pete did play a bunch of rinky dink tournies at the end of 98
IIRC so maybe he was just
mentally spent and thought he needed a lengthy break to recharge his
batteries. And AO's so
brutally hot and that was never his best Slam anyway. In retrospect it
was a mistake not to play
considering how close Fed is.

Do you remember Kafelnikov thanked Pete for not playing in his speech
after the final? LOL


  
Date: 09 Jan 2009 19:30:46
From:
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 10, 2:54=A0am, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 9, 9:30=A0pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.com..=
.
> > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com> wrote:
>
> > > it's just psychology.
>
> > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's wh=
at
>
> > Pete did to Andre
> > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
>
> > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
> > enough when it really
> > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
> > it took him a couple of years
> > to recover from.
>
> > <<<<<
>
> > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old and =
is
> > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
>
> Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon but
> he clearly looked like the
> best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad he
> got injured and couldn't play.

Can you believe Sampras didn't even *play* the AO in 1999? He took a
break due to fatigue after finishing YE #1 for the 6th time.

Can you imagine Federer not bothering to play this year's AO?





  
Date: 09 Jan 2009 19:19:37
From: Jason Catlin
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 9, 9:56=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On =A09-Jan-2009, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Jan 9, 9:30=A0pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
> > > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> > >news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.com=
...
> > > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com> wrote=
:
>
> > > > it's just psychology.
>
> > > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> > > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's
> > > >>>>what
>
> > > Pete did to Andre
> > > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
>
> > > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
> > > enough when it really
> > > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
> > > it took him a couple of years
> > > to recover from.
>
> > > <<<<<
>
> > > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old an=
d
> > > is
> > > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
>
> > Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon but
> > he clearly looked like the
> > best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad he
> > got injured and couldn't play.
>
> Did he now....-

Of course. Look it up.


   
Date: 10 Jan 2009 03:22:48
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !

On 9-Jan-2009, Jason Catlin <jason-catlin@hotmail.com > wrote:

> On Jan 9, 9:56 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On  9-Jan-2009, Jason Catlin <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > On Jan 9, 9:30 pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
> > > > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > >>>>>>>>>>>>>news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> > > > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com>
> > > > wrote:
> >
> > > > > it's just psychology.
> >
> > > > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> > > > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's
> > > > >>>>what
> >
> > > > Pete did to Andre
> > > > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
> >
> > > > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
> > > > enough when it really
> > > > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
> > > > it took him a couple of years
> > > > to recover from.
> >
> > > > <<<<<
> >
> > > > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old
> > > > and
> > > > is
> > > > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
> >
> > > Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon but
> > > he clearly looked like the
> > > best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad he
> > > got injured and couldn't play.
> >
> > Did he now....-
>
> Of course. Look it up.

I don't think I can look up anything for 2009 yet..:)


  
Date: 09 Jan 2009 18:54:12
From: Jason Catlin
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
On Jan 9, 9:30=A0pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com > wrote:
> "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com> wrote:
>
> > it's just psychology.
>
> > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's what
>
> Pete did to Andre
> in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
>
> Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
> enough when it really
> mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
> it took him a couple of years
> to recover from.
>
> <<<<<
>
> Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old and is
> beaing beaten down by the new balls.

Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon but
he clearly looked like the
best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad he
got injured and couldn't play.


   
Date: 10 Jan 2009 02:56:38
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !

On 9-Jan-2009, Jason Catlin <jason-catlin@hotmail.com > wrote:

> On Jan 9, 9:30 pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com> wrote:
> > "Jason Catlin" <jason-cat...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> >
> > news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
> > On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com> wrote:
> >
> > > it's just psychology.
> >
> > > Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.
> > >>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's
> > >>>>what
> >
> > Pete did to Andre
> > in 1995, set him up for the *fall*
> >
> > Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
> > enough when it really
> > mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
> > it took him a couple of years
> > to recover from.
> >
> > <<<<<
> >
> > Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old and
> > is
> > beaing beaten down by the new balls.
>
> Pete still played some sublime tennis in 2009. Not only Wimbledon but
> he clearly looked like the
> best player in the world leading up to the USO that year. Too bad he
> got injured and couldn't play.

Did he now....


  
Date: 10 Jan 2009 02:30:28
From: Stapler
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
"Jason Catlin" <jason-catlin@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:85e6dde3-0fac-4eea-a2ce-b1ba6817256f@m22g2000vbl.googlegroups.com...
On Jan 9, 7:19 pm, Dave Hazelwood <the_big_kah...@mailcity.com > wrote:
> it's just psychology.
>
> Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.

>>>>This is a good time for Fed to prove he's Sampras' equal. That's what
Pete did to Andre
in 1995, set him up for the *fall*

Andre owned Pete in some tune-up before the USO that year, but sure
enough when it really
mattered Pete came up with the goods and sent Agassi into a tailspin
it took him a couple of years
to recover from.

<<<<<

Your theory would work if this were 2005, not 2009. Fed is too old and is
beaing beaten down by the new balls.



 
Date: 10 Jan 2009 11:23:47
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Nothing to do at all with mono !
Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>
> it's just psychology.
>
> Fed is setting Murray up for the *big* fall is all.


Maybe. That is still a viable theory.