tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 29 Jan 2009 04:08:39
From: mimus
Subject: One, Love and Love
That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.

--

Take a deep breath, take a walk, cool off, plot a bit, and serve again.





 
Date: 30 Jan 2009 02:22:48
From: MBDunc
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love


Whisper kirjoitti:
> Roddick was a hyper version of Sampras - ie serving huge & charging the
> net. I never said he was any good at it, just that he was 'trying' to
> do it all bigger & faster than Sampras due to his hyperactivity.
> Obviously Roddick was never able to place the serve as smartly as
> Sampras or with varied spins. Hitting huge is limited if the range is
> narrow. Also his net skills are even worse than Federer's.
>
> Having said that Roddick was still good enough to totally dominate clown
> era if Fed wasn't around, but he was never fit to carry Sampras' boots.

2003 you thought otherwise:

"Roddick has more power than maybe anyone before him. He can rip
winners off
both sides & hold his serve on any surface. I genuinely expect him to
win
at least 1 FO - it'll be his least successful slam, but I'll be
mildly
surprised if he doesn't break through at some point... "

"On the available evidence it looks like Roddick is really going to
dominate
bigtime. Not only does he have the big game, but his attitude is
fantastic.
If Roddick gets 100 for attitude, Rios would be about a 7.... "

"It may not look that way now, but I expect Roddick to have a nice
little
streak at Wimbledon (maybe win next 3?) - he wants it badly, & we saw
how
tough he is when in the zone in USO final. On grass he should be even
more
potent... he's like a modern day Becker with better bh & probably
tougher in
the crunch... "

"I suspect it's better than 50-50 he will win FO in the next 3 or 4
yrs....
Looking forward to him crunching those Kuerten/Costa/Coria
types...... ; ) "

Fed really spoiled your preditictions...

.mikko





  
Date: 30 Jan 2009 15:33:28
From: mimus
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Fri, 30 Jan 2009 02:22:48 -0800, MBDunc wrote:

> Fed really spoiled your preditictions...

That is exactly the case with both Roddick and Blake.

And then came Nadal . . . .

--

Take a deep breath, take a walk, cool off, plot a bit, and serve again.




 
Date: 29 Jan 2009 05:42:59
From: wkhedr
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Jan 29, 4:52=A0am, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au=
>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.=
au >
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> mimus wrote:
> >>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>
> >>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
> >>>>> yeah.
>
> >>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
> >>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
> >>>>> muffed the shot !
>
> >>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
> >>>>> rafa.
> >>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
> >>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>
> >>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember=
?
>
> >> Looks like Roddick to me.
>
> > No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>
> > If you don't the rest of us do.
>
> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.- Hide quot=
ed text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Sampras was never hyperactive, idiot!


  
Date: 30 Jan 2009 14:18:19
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
wkhedr wrote:
> On Jan 29, 4:52 am, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Sampras was never hyperactive, idiot!


Roddick was a hyper version of Sampras - ie serving huge & charging the
net. I never said he was any good at it, just that he was 'trying' to
do it all bigger & faster than Sampras due to his hyperactivity.
Obviously Roddick was never able to place the serve as smartly as
Sampras or with varied spins. Hitting huge is limited if the range is
narrow. Also his net skills are even worse than Federer's.

Having said that Roddick was still good enough to totally dominate clown
era if Fed wasn't around, but he was never fit to carry Sampras' boots.







  
Date: 29 Jan 2009 14:00:03
From: Vari L. Cinicke
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
wkhedr wrote:
> On Jan 29, 4:52 am, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> Sampras was never hyperactive, idiot!

Hooked fish wriggle when you reel them in! This is normal! :-D

--
Cheers,

vc


 
Date: 29 Jan 2009 02:30:49
From: MBDunc
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love


Whisper kirjoitti:
> If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras then
> it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? I mean
> there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
> Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?

True. You did not say above.

However you said multiple times that Roddick's best is better than
Becker's and Agassi's best....and Roddick's hypotetical results with
Fed's absence would probably have proven that claim.

.mikko


  
Date: 29 Jan 2009 13:40:13
From: Vari L. Cinicke
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
MBDunc wrote:
>
> Whisper kirjoitti:
>> If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras then
>> it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? I mean
>> there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
>> Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?
>
> True. You did not say above.
>
> However you said multiple times that Roddick's best is better than
> Becker's and Agassi's best....and Roddick's hypotetical results with
> Fed's absence would probably have proven that claim.
>
> .mikko

What about Agassi's hypothetical results without Sampras?

You can't base anything on these hypotheticals. Will Whisper give
Federer the respect that a hypothetical "what if no Nadal" scenario will
produce?

I don't think so.

--
Cheers,

vc


 
Date: 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
mimus wrote:
> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>


Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.



  
Date: 29 Jan 2009 09:20:04
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>mimus wrote:
>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>
>
>
>Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.

yeah.

i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
muffed the shot !

Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
rafa.


   
Date: 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> mimus wrote:
>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>
>>
>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>
> yeah.
>
> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
> muffed the shot !
>
> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
> rafa.


Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.



    
Date: 29 Jan 2009 05:42:45
From: Rodjk #613
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Jan 29, 4:37=A0am, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:22:53 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au>
> > wrote:
>
> >> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au=
>
> >>> wrote:
>
> >>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> >>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.=
au >
> >>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.co=
m.au >
> >>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.=
com.au >
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>
> >>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>
> >>>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
> >>>>>>>>> yeah.
>
> >>>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley =
but
> >>>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him an=
d
> >>>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>
> >>>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to b=
eat
> >>>>>>>>> rafa.
> >>>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the mat=
ch.
> >>>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
> >>>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" reme=
mber?
> >>>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
> >>>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>
> >>>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
> >>>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.
>
> >>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>
> >>> and if he had 12 slams now ? I am sure you would be saying that NOT !
>
> >>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
> >>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
> >>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>
> >> Look he would have 7 slams easy by now if Fed wasn't around. =A0This i=
s a
> >> clown era & Roddick would have easily dominated.
>
> >> If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras th=
en
> >> it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? =A0I =
mean
> >> there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
> >> Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?
>
> > I guess that confirms that the guy you called "Sampras on steroids" is
> > indeed a "clown" ?
>
> No, but he woulda dominated clown era to 80% of Fed's domination. =A0I've
> never said Fed or Rafa are clowns - you won't find a single post.

No, but you belittle their accomplishments by saying that the rest of
the field is clowns. We call it 'damning with faint praise'

Rodjk #613


    
Date: 29 Jan 2009 09:43:08
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> mimus wrote:
>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>
>> yeah.
>>
>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>> muffed the shot !
>>
>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>> rafa.
>
>
>Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.


He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?


     
Date: 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>
>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>> yeah.
>>>
>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>> muffed the shot !
>>>
>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>> rafa.
>>
>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>
>
> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?


Looks like Roddick to me.



      
Date: 29 Jan 2009 09:48:15
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>
>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>> yeah.
>>>>
>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>
>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>> rafa.
>>>
>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>
>>
>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>
>
>Looks like Roddick to me.


No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?

If you don't the rest of us do.


       
Date: 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>
>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>
>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>> rafa.
>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>
>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>
>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>
>
> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>
> If you don't the rest of us do.


Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.



        
Date: 29 Jan 2009 09:59:45
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>
>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>
>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>
>>
>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>
>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>
>
>Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.


ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

and if he had 12 slams now ? I am sure you would be saying that NOT !

ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha


         
Date: 29 Jan 2009 21:22:53
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>>
>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>
>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>>
>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.
>
>
> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>
> and if he had 12 slams now ? I am sure you would be saying that NOT !
>
> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha


Look he would have 7 slams easy by now if Fed wasn't around. This is a
clown era & Roddick would have easily dominated.

If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras then
it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? I mean
there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?






          
Date: 29 Jan 2009 10:35:35
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:22:53 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>>>
>>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>
>>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>>>
>>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.
>>
>>
>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>
>> and if he had 12 slams now ? I am sure you would be saying that NOT !
>>
>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>
>
>Look he would have 7 slams easy by now if Fed wasn't around. This is a
>clown era & Roddick would have easily dominated.
>
>If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras then
>it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? I mean
>there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
>Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?
>

I guess that confirms that the guy you called "Sampras on steroids" is
indeed a "clown" ?


           
Date: 29 Jan 2009 21:37:56
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:22:53 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>>
>>>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>>>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.
>>>
>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>
>>> and if he had 12 slams now ? I am sure you would be saying that NOT !
>>>
>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>
>> Look he would have 7 slams easy by now if Fed wasn't around. This is a
>> clown era & Roddick would have easily dominated.
>>
>> If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras then
>> it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? I mean
>> there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
>> Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?
>>
>
> I guess that confirms that the guy you called "Sampras on steroids" is
> indeed a "clown" ?


No, but he woulda dominated clown era to 80% of Fed's domination. I've
never said Fed or Rafa are clowns - you won't find a single post.



            
Date: 29 Jan 2009 10:51:36
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:37:56 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:22:53 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>>>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>>>>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.
>>>>
>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>>
>>>> and if he had 12 slams now ? I am sure you would be saying that NOT !
>>>>
>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>
>>> Look he would have 7 slams easy by now if Fed wasn't around. This is a
>>> clown era & Roddick would have easily dominated.
>>>
>>> If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras then
>>> it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? I mean
>>> there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
>>> Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?
>>>
>>
>> I guess that confirms that the guy you called "Sampras on steroids" is
>> indeed a "clown" ?
>
>
>No, but he woulda dominated clown era to 80% of Fed's domination. I've
>never said Fed or Rafa are clowns - you won't find a single post.


that does not compute or Roddick should be #2 and have all of Rafa's
slams no ?

at a minimum it must mean roddick is NOT a clown and yet so many have
beat his arse to a pulp and won slams when he has not.

how the fuck can you be so dumb ? oh wait ! it's whisper !!!


             
Date: 29 Jan 2009 22:11:47
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
Dave Hazelwood wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:37:56 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:22:53 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>>>>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>>>>>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.
>>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>>>
>>>>> and if he had 12 slams now ? I am sure you would be saying that NOT !
>>>>>
>>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>> Look he would have 7 slams easy by now if Fed wasn't around. This is a
>>>> clown era & Roddick would have easily dominated.
>>>>
>>>> If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras then
>>>> it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? I mean
>>>> there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
>>>> Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?
>>>>
>>> I guess that confirms that the guy you called "Sampras on steroids" is
>>> indeed a "clown" ?
>>
>> No, but he woulda dominated clown era to 80% of Fed's domination. I've
>> never said Fed or Rafa are clowns - you won't find a single post.
>
>
> that does not compute or Roddick should be #2 and have all of Rafa's
> slams no ?
>
> at a minimum it must mean roddick is NOT a clown and yet so many have
> beat his arse to a pulp and won slams when he has not.
>
> how the fuck can you be so dumb ? oh wait ! it's whisper !!!


Look I've wasted enough time trying to explain it to you. Fair suck of
the tier-1 resources.



              
Date: 29 Jan 2009 11:30:57
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: One, Love and Love
On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 22:11:47 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:37:56 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:22:53 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:52:15 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:44:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:38:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Dave Hazelwood wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:11:07 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> mimus wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That's what this pitiful display is shaping up to be.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Roger genuinely likes Roddick & this can't be easy for him.
>>>>>>>>>>>> yeah.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> i saw he just had a chance to put him away with a smash volley but
>>>>>>>>>>>> andy was at the net and i could see Fed tried not to hit him and
>>>>>>>>>>>> muffed the shot !
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fed gotta get over that shit and become a killer out there to beat
>>>>>>>>>>>> rafa.
>>>>>>>>>>> Yeah, he's gotta kill Roddick & feel sorry for him after the match.
>>>>>>>>>>> It's not his fault Roddick is using poor strategy.
>>>>>>>>>> He's not playing Roddick. He's playing "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>>>>>> Looks like Roddick to me.
>>>>>>>> No. You said this guys was "Sampras on steroids" remember?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you don't the rest of us do.
>>>>>>> Yes, I was referring to his hyperactivity & not ability - duh.
>>>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>>>>
>>>>>> and if he had 12 slams now ? I am sure you would be saying that NOT !
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>>>> ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha
>>>>> Look he would have 7 slams easy by now if Fed wasn't around. This is a
>>>>> clown era & Roddick would have easily dominated.
>>>>>
>>>>> If you really think I said Roddick was better or as good as Sampras then
>>>>> it would be easy to find 1,000's of posts backing that up right? I mean
>>>>> there are many posts where I demonstrate Rafa's superiority over Fed.
>>>>> Funny thing is you won't find a single post - strange eh?
>>>>>
>>>> I guess that confirms that the guy you called "Sampras on steroids" is
>>>> indeed a "clown" ?
>>>
>>> No, but he woulda dominated clown era to 80% of Fed's domination. I've
>>> never said Fed or Rafa are clowns - you won't find a single post.
>>
>>
>> that does not compute or Roddick should be #2 and have all of Rafa's
>> slams no ?
>>
>> at a minimum it must mean roddick is NOT a clown and yet so many have
>> beat his arse to a pulp and won slams when he has not.
>>
>> how the fuck can you be so dumb ? oh wait ! it's whisper !!!
>
>
>Look I've wasted enough time trying to explain it to you. Fair suck of
>the tier-1 resources.


too *hot* for you eh ? retiring like Djockovic are you ?