tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 18 Feb 2009 05:10:24
From: Professor X
Subject: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative


"From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
after this post."

If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.

so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....





 
Date: 21 Feb 2009 19:26:54
From: amy
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 20, 8:08=A0am, Led-Yes-Pin-Bea-Rol <zepflo...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 20, 5:30=A0am, "Iceberg" <iceberg.ru...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > "drew" <d...@technologist.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:75fbe086-7891-4c38-b0d1-8ba813fd359f@v15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com..=
.
>
> > > On Feb 19, 10:36 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >> If he really was playing all three characters there would be much ea=
sier
> > >> ways....
>
> > > You've clearly looked into =A0the technical side of their posting
> > > habits. =A0I haven't taken the time to even gain knowledge of these
> > > subtleties. =A0 It is possible that these freaks are separate charact=
ers
> > > but I'm fairly confident that Striptease is Whisper.
>
> > > It's just too incestuous to be real.
>
> > don't you think WAY2GOOD could be Whisper too and perhaps even Raja? wh=
at
> > about Geo, perhaps she is Whisper too. Don't get paranoid about changin=
g
> > characters, lol.
>
> You moron, I am not him. Anyone one in his right mind wouldnt possibly
> think of that. He knows nothing about music, movies or sports.- Hide quot=
ed text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Raja YOU dont know shit about music, movies as proven time and time
again. Nobody has EVER complimented you on pop culture knowledge as
you are devoid.


 
Date: 20 Feb 2009 06:08:00
From: Led-Yes-Pin-Bea-Rol
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 20, 5:30=A0am, "Iceberg" <iceberg.ru...@googlemail.com > wrote:
> "drew" <d...@technologist.com> wrote in message
>
> news:75fbe086-7891-4c38-b0d1-8ba813fd359f@v15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > On Feb 19, 10:36 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> If he really was playing all three characters there would be much easi=
er
> >> ways....
>
> > You've clearly looked into =A0the technical side of their posting
> > habits. =A0I haven't taken the time to even gain knowledge of these
> > subtleties. =A0 It is possible that these freaks are separate character=
s
> > but I'm fairly confident that Striptease is Whisper.
>
> > It's just too incestuous to be real.
>
> don't you think WAY2GOOD could be Whisper too and perhaps even Raja? what
> about Geo, perhaps she is Whisper too. Don't get paranoid about changing
> characters, lol.

You moron, I am not him. Anyone one in his right mind wouldnt possibly
think of that. He knows nothing about music, movies or sports.



 
Date: 20 Feb 2009 02:17:05
From: M
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On 18 Feb, 23:26, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 3:20=A0pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>
> > zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
> > > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>
> > Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you must=
be
> > pretty dumb.
>
> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.

I think there was call once for the idiot to create group for him and
supporters to masturabte over but you see - this is nothing to do with
Pete as much as trolling.

Your right if yo look at his posts ( esp the old ones ) you'll see
crazy stats that suggest this freak spends every breath of life
repeating the same argument - an argument that has gone on and on
becuse there is no argument i.e. he isnt right therefore no one ever
agrees with him.

My question is why no one here in all these years had grouped together
and banned him - it goes to show there are people even sicker than
Whisper here who actually enjoy aruging with the idiot.


  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 17:29:26
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.

On 20-Feb-2009, M <matt.tippen@gmail.com > wrote:

> My question is why no one here in all these years had grouped together
> and banned him - it goes to show there are people even sicker than
> Whisper here who actually enjoy aruging with the idiot.

You want us to "ban" him, eh?


 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 23:15:46
From: drew
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 20, 1:35=A0am, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:

> You're correct of course. =A0Amazes me people put this much thought into
> it when the simple question "What kind of return could I expect from all
> that investment to make it worthwhile?' should suffice.

I think that feeding your rather large ego would probably be
motivation enough for you to go to any extent to attempt to create a
small support group.

That fact that you are denying this vehemently tells me that you feel
a little threatened that your ruse might be exposed.

It would be embarassing for you to have your insecurity displayed for
all to see. I expect you take yourself and your opinions and your
multiple personalites very seriously.

Your thinly veiled homosexual fantasies are also quite transparent.





  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 21:22:26
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
drew wrote:
> On Feb 20, 1:35 am, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
>> You're correct of course. Amazes me people put this much thought into
>> it when the simple question "What kind of return could I expect from all
>> that investment to make it worthwhile?' should suffice.
>
> I think that feeding your rather large ego would probably be
> motivation enough for you to go to any extent to attempt to create a
> small support group.
>
> That fact that you are denying this vehemently tells me that you feel
> a little threatened that your ruse might be exposed.


I just think you're way over the top & I sense a little embarrassed?



 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 21:31:44
From: drew
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 19, 10:36=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:

> If he really was playing all three characters there would be much easier
> ways....

You've clearly looked into the technical side of their posting
habits. I haven't taken the time to even gain knowledge of these
subtleties. It is possible that these freaks are separate characters
but I'm fairly confident that Striptease is Whisper.

It's just too incestuous to be real.



  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 11:30:01
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
"drew" <drew@technologist.com > wrote in message
news:75fbe086-7891-4c38-b0d1-8ba813fd359f@v15g2000vbb.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 19, 10:36 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If he really was playing all three characters there would be much easier
>> ways....
>
> You've clearly looked into the technical side of their posting
> habits. I haven't taken the time to even gain knowledge of these
> subtleties. It is possible that these freaks are separate characters
> but I'm fairly confident that Striptease is Whisper.
>
> It's just too incestuous to be real.

don't you think WAY2GOOD could be Whisper too and perhaps even Raja? what
about Geo, perhaps she is Whisper too. Don't get paranoid about changing
characters, lol.



 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 18:59:53
From: Raja
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 19, 4:19=A0pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 18-Feb-2009, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 18, 3:20=A0pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> > > zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I a=
m
> > > > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>
> > > Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you mu=
st
> > > be
> > > pretty dumb.
>
> > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> > accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.
>
> But from a technological standpoint it's even less likely that Whisper,
> *skriptis, and bob are the same person. =A0Not only would a new writing s=
tyle
> have to be created, but there would have to be usenet accounts opened in
> different countries and the use of proxies in those countries as well.
> Additionally, if you can trust the headers then you would have to conclud=
e
> that different operating systems were in use, different newsreaders, etc.
> The commonality between *skriptis and bob is that they both use OE (well =
in
> bob's case it's Windows Mail, but that is in the same codebase *but* is o=
nly
> found on Vista) and both have trouble with attributions (but in the case =
of
> bob, it is far worse). =A0Boy it would be an effort to do all of that
> consistently for years and also to get up to post in your sockpuppet's
> timezone...... I just don't see it.......

Whisper never sleeps. He is a crude junk robot sent back in time to
terminate usenet once and for all.



  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 03:36:40
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.

On 19-Feb-2009, Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com > wrote:

> On Feb 19, 4:19 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 18-Feb-2009, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> > > > zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > > > > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I
> > > > >am
> > > > > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
> >
> > > > Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
> > > > must
> > > > be
> > > > pretty dumb.
> >
> > > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> > > accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.
> >
> > But from a technological standpoint it's even less likely that Whisper,
> > *skriptis, and bob are the same person.  Not only would a new writing
> > style
> > have to be created, but there would have to be usenet accounts opened in
> > different countries and the use of proxies in those countries as well.
> > Additionally, if you can trust the headers then you would have to
> > conclude
> > that different operating systems were in use, different newsreaders,
> > etc.
> > The commonality between *skriptis and bob is that they both use OE (well
> > in
> > bob's case it's Windows Mail, but that is in the same codebase *but* is
> > only
> > found on Vista) and both have trouble with attributions (but in the case
> > of
> > bob, it is far worse).  Boy it would be an effort to do all of that
> > consistently for years and also to get up to post in your sockpuppet's
> > timezone...... I just don't see it.......
>
> Whisper never sleeps. He is a crude junk robot sent back in time to
> terminate usenet once and for all.

If he really was playing all three characters there would be much easier
ways....


   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 03:43:51
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Fri, 20 Feb 2009 03:36:40 GMT, "jdeluise" <jdeluise@gmail.com >
wrote:

>
>On 19-Feb-2009, Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 19, 4:19 pm, "jdeluise" <jdelu...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On 18-Feb-2009, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> > > > zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >
>> > > > > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I
>> > > > >am
>> > > > > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>> >
>> > > > Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>> > > > must
>> > > > be
>> > > > pretty dumb.
>> >
>> > > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>> > > accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.
>> >
>> > But from a technological standpoint it's even less likely that Whisper,
>> > *skriptis, and bob are the same person.  Not only would a new writing
>> > style
>> > have to be created, but there would have to be usenet accounts opened in
>> > different countries and the use of proxies in those countries as well.
>> > Additionally, if you can trust the headers then you would have to
>> > conclude
>> > that different operating systems were in use, different newsreaders,
>> > etc.
>> > The commonality between *skriptis and bob is that they both use OE (well
>> > in
>> > bob's case it's Windows Mail, but that is in the same codebase *but* is
>> > only
>> > found on Vista) and both have trouble with attributions (but in the case
>> > of
>> > bob, it is far worse).  Boy it would be an effort to do all of that
>> > consistently for years and also to get up to post in your sockpuppet's
>> > timezone...... I just don't see it.......
>>
>> Whisper never sleeps. He is a crude junk robot sent back in time to
>> terminate usenet once and for all.
>
>If he really was playing all three characters there would be much easier
>ways....


i think bob is just a poodle but skriptis is a real sock puppet.


 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 09:53:37
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 19, 5:34=A0pm, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr > wrote:
> Professor X wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 4:59 pm, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>
> >>> Raja wrote:
> >>>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> >>>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >>>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out.
> >>>>>> I am 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>
> >>>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
> >>>>> must be pretty dumb.
>
> >>>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> >>>> accounts.
>
> >>> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many
> >>> years it is obvious that they are not the same person. It is not
> >>> easy to create another persona with a different writing style and
> >>> keep it consistent over a long period. Also, Whisper would not say
> >>> what *skriptis has been saying about Graf and Seles in one thread
> >>> over the past couple of days. Either that or Whisper is going to a
> >>> lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being silly.
>
> >> If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
> >> noticed. I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
> >> he has little reliable support here. bob may or may not be a Whisper
> >> creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
> >> personality disorder. Other people here create different accounts and
> >> they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
> >> I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. Whisper
> >> doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. They do it
> >> for him if you catch my drift.
>
> > Yes I made a post earlier responding to whisper... and then SKRIPTIS
> > responded to my post saying that I hadn't understood what he had said
> > (skriptis).... yet i had replied to whisper !!! lol...
>
> It was a mistake, don't make some conspiracy theories out of nothing.
> I saw you were replying to tier 1 analysis post but I didn't realise the
> post was Whisper's and not mine.
>
> I am also using this oportunity to apologise to Whisper if it caused him =
any
> discomfort.

lol you are just digging yourself a deeper hole - whispy/skitrip.


 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 09:11:13
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 19, 4:59=A0pm, drew <d...@technologist.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Raja wrote:
> > > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> > >> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > >>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I a=
m
> > >>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>
> > >> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
> > >> must be pretty dumb.
>
> > > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> > > accounts.
>
> > Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many year=
s it is
> > obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create ano=
ther
> > persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a lo=
ng
> > period. Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying abou=
t Graf
> > and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or Wh=
isper is
> > going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being=
silly.
>
> If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
> noticed. =A0I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
> he has little reliable support here. =A0bob may or may not be a Whisper
> creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
> personality disorder. =A0Other people here create different accounts and
> they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
> I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. =A0Whisper
> doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. =A0They do it
> for him if you catch my drift.

Yes I made a post earlier responding to whisper... and then SKRIPTIS
responded to my post saying that I hadn't understood what he had said
(skriptis).... yet i had replied to whisper !!! lol...


  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 17:50:41
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 19, 4:59 pm, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Raja wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>>>>>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>>>>> must be pretty dumb.
>>>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>>>> accounts.
>>> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many years it is
>>> obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create another
>>> persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a long
>>> period. Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying about Graf
>>> and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or Whisper is
>>> going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being silly.
>> If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
>> noticed. I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
>> he has little reliable support here. bob may or may not be a Whisper
>> creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
>> personality disorder. Other people here create different accounts and
>> they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
>> I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. Whisper
>> doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. They do it
>> for him if you catch my drift.
>
> Yes I made a post earlier responding to whisper... and then SKRIPTIS
> responded to my post saying that I hadn't understood what he had said
> (skriptis).... yet i had replied to whisper !!! lol...


So if I admit you caught me out will *skrptis stop posting forever to go
along with it?



  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 18:34:33
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 19, 4:59 pm, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Raja wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out.
>>>>>> I am 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>
>>>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>>>>> must be pretty dumb.
>>
>>>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>>>> accounts.
>>
>>> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many
>>> years it is obvious that they are not the same person. It is not
>>> easy to create another persona with a different writing style and
>>> keep it consistent over a long period. Also, Whisper would not say
>>> what *skriptis has been saying about Graf and Seles in one thread
>>> over the past couple of days. Either that or Whisper is going to a
>>> lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being silly.
>>
>> If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
>> noticed. I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
>> he has little reliable support here. bob may or may not be a Whisper
>> creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
>> personality disorder. Other people here create different accounts and
>> they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
>> I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. Whisper
>> doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. They do it
>> for him if you catch my drift.
>
> Yes I made a post earlier responding to whisper... and then SKRIPTIS
> responded to my post saying that I hadn't understood what he had said
> (skriptis).... yet i had replied to whisper !!! lol...


It was a mistake, don't make some conspiracy theories out of nothing.
I saw you were replying to tier 1 analysis post but I didn't realise the
post was Whisper's and not mine.

I am also using this oportunity to apologise to Whisper if it caused him any
discomfort.




   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 01:30:26
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:34:33 +0100, "*skriptis"
<skriptis@post.t-com.hr > wrote:

>Professor X wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 4:59 pm, drew <d...@technologist.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Raja wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>>>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out.
>>>>>>> I am 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>>
>>>>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>>>>>> must be pretty dumb.
>>>
>>>>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>>>>> accounts.
>>>
>>>> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many
>>>> years it is obvious that they are not the same person. It is not
>>>> easy to create another persona with a different writing style and
>>>> keep it consistent over a long period. Also, Whisper would not say
>>>> what *skriptis has been saying about Graf and Seles in one thread
>>>> over the past couple of days. Either that or Whisper is going to a
>>>> lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being silly.
>>>
>>> If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
>>> noticed. I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
>>> he has little reliable support here. bob may or may not be a Whisper
>>> creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
>>> personality disorder. Other people here create different accounts and
>>> they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
>>> I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. Whisper
>>> doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. They do it
>>> for him if you catch my drift.
>>
>> Yes I made a post earlier responding to whisper... and then SKRIPTIS
>> responded to my post saying that I hadn't understood what he had said
>> (skriptis).... yet i had replied to whisper !!! lol...
>
>
>It was a mistake, don't make some conspiracy theories out of nothing.
>I saw you were replying to tier 1 analysis post but I didn't realise the
>post was Whisper's and not mine.
>
>I am also using this oportunity to apologise to Whisper if it caused him any
>discomfort.

looking in the mirror are you ?


 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 08:59:34
From: drew
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided > wrote:
> Raja wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> >> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
> >>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>
> >> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
> >> must be pretty dumb.
>
> > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> > accounts.
>
> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many years it is
> obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create another
> persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a long
> period. Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying about Graf
> and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or Whisper is
> going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being silly.


If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
noticed. I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
he has little reliable support here. bob may or may not be a Whisper
creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
personality disorder. Other people here create different accounts and
they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. Whisper
doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. They do it
for him if you catch my drift.


  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 17:22:00
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
drew wrote:
> On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> Raja wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>>>>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>>>> must be pretty dumb.
>>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>>> accounts.
>> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many years it is
>> obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create another
>> persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a long
>> period. Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying about Graf
>> and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or Whisper is
>> going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being silly.
>
>
> If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
> noticed. I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
> he has little reliable support here. bob may or may not be a Whisper
> creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
> personality disorder. Other people here create different accounts and
> they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
> I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. Whisper
> doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. They do it
> for him if you catch my drift.



Yeah, that makes sense.

You're wasting your talents here - should be working in forensics.



   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 17:22:43
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
Whisper wrote:
> drew wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>> Raja wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>>>>>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>>>>> must be pretty dumb.
>>>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>>>> accounts.
>>> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many
>>> years it is
>>> obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create
>>> another
>>> persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a
>>> long
>>> period. Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying
>>> about Graf
>>> and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or
>>> Whisper is
>>> going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop
>>> being silly.
>>
>>
>> If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
>> noticed. I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
>> he has little reliable support here. bob may or may not be a Whisper
>> creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
>> personality disorder. Other people here create different accounts and
>> they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
>> I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. Whisper
>> doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. They do it
>> for him if you catch my drift.
>
>
>
> Yeah, that makes sense.
>
> You're wasting your talents here - should be working in forensics.
>



...or at least writing B-grade detective plots.



  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 22:25:39
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.

On 19-Feb-2009, drew <drew@technologist.com > wrote:

> On Feb 18, 6:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> > Raja wrote:
> > > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> > >> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > >>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
> > >>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
> >
> > >> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
> > >> must be pretty dumb.
> >
> > > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> > > accounts.
> >
> > Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many years
> > it is
> > obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create
> > another
> > persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a
> > long
> > period. Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying about
> > Graf
> > and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or
> > Whisper is
> > going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being
> > silly.
>
>
> If you haven't noticed, Whisper goes to a lot of trouble to be
> noticed. I'm convinced that he is this *Striptease character because
> he has little reliable support here. bob may or may not be a Whisper
> creation but it's clear that Whisper is a strange guy with a
> personality disorder. Other people here create different accounts and
> they make no attempt to conceal the connection to the other username.
> I think *Striptease is one of Whisper's 'personalities'. Whisper
> doesn't have to consciously separate the two characters. They do it
> for him if you catch my drift.

Since both bob and Whisper use an ISP news service (not GG) I don't find it
convincing that they are the same person. He would probably have to
actually purchase an American dial-up plan and then use a proxy that
supports usenet on that ISPs network. hmm doesn't sound likely.....

It would have been easier for him to just create a couple of different
accounts on different international *non-ISP* news services that masks IP
addresses in the header. Anyone who wanted to keep this up for this many
years would do that simply because it would be WAY easier than the above
scenario I described and still wouldn't look all that suspicious.


 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 03:57:05
From: Silence, Fedfucker!
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 19, 7:19 am, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr > wrote:
> Raja wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> >> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
> >>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>
> >> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
> >> must be pretty dumb.
>
> > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> > accounts.
>
> No, not anyone can do that. Some just can't.
> Like you eg., we always recognise your puppet.

I am Raja's puppet and proud of it. Why can't you be proud of being
Whisper's ?


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 12:06:59
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 03:57:05 -0800 (PST), "Silence, Fedfucker!"
<thetruetennisgoat@hotmail.co.uk > wrote:

>On Feb 19, 7:19 am, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>> Raja wrote:
>> > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> >> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> >>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>> >>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>
>> >> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>> >> must be pretty dumb.
>>
>> > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>> > accounts.
>>
>> No, not anyone can do that. Some just can't.
>> Like you eg., we always recognise your puppet.
>
>I am Raja's puppet and proud of it. Why can't you be proud of being
>Whisper's ?


because whisper likes having two assholes and you don't ?


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 17:57:18
From: Raja
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 5:42=A0pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided > wrote:
> Raja wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> >> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> >>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
> >>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>
> >> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
> >> must be pretty dumb.
>
> > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> > accounts.
>
> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many years =
it is
> obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create anoth=
er
> persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a long
> period.

If you are psycho enough you can do that.

>Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying about Graf
> and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or Whis=
per is
> going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being s=
illy.

You are silly, and you dont know Whisper.




  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 02:21:44
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:57:18 -0800 (PST), Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com >
wrote:

>On Feb 18, 5:42 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> Raja wrote:
>> > On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> >> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> >>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>> >>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>
>> >> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>> >> must be pretty dumb.
>>
>> > You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>> > accounts.
>>
>> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many years it is
>> obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create another
>> persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a long
>> period.
>
>If you are psycho enough you can do that.
>
>>Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying about Graf
>> and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or Whisper is
>> going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being silly.
>
>You are silly, and you dont know Whisper.
>


that's correct. whisper sounds like a true schizo. unfortunately both
are sampras fan fuckers.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 17:45:42
From: xamigax@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On 18 f=E9v, 14:10, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> after this post."
>
> If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....

Okay, let's try it.

Is it okay to refer to that as "whisper's wanking system" ?
Just in case some newcomer had a bit of searches back into RST older
post?
In fact, I do like a lot the swap between the "r" and the "w"...
Should I consider this has one my first 100% english joke that does
work?

Share & Enjoy,
Manolo


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 15:26:28
From: Raja
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 3:20=A0pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided > wrote:
> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
> > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>
> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you must b=
e
> pretty dumb.

You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.



  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 22:19:30
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.

On 18-Feb-2009, Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com > wrote:

> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> > zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >
> > > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
> > > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
> >
> > Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you must
> > be
> > pretty dumb.
>
> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.

But from a technological standpoint it's even less likely that Whisper,
*skriptis, and bob are the same person. Not only would a new writing style
have to be created, but there would have to be usenet accounts opened in
different countries and the use of proxies in those countries as well.
Additionally, if you can trust the headers then you would have to conclude
that different operating systems were in use, different newsreaders, etc.
The commonality between *skriptis and bob is that they both use OE (well in
bob's case it's Windows Mail, but that is in the same codebase *but* is only
found on Vista) and both have trouble with attributions (but in the case of
bob, it is far worse). Boy it would be an effort to do all of that
consistently for years and also to get up to post in your sockpuppet's
timezone...... I just don't see it.......


   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 17:35:39
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
jdeluise wrote:
> On 18-Feb-2009, Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>>>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you must
>>> be
>>> pretty dumb.
>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>> accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.
>
> But from a technological standpoint it's even less likely that Whisper,
> *skriptis, and bob are the same person. Not only would a new writing style
> have to be created, but there would have to be usenet accounts opened in
> different countries and the use of proxies in those countries as well.
> Additionally, if you can trust the headers then you would have to conclude
> that different operating systems were in use, different newsreaders, etc.
> The commonality between *skriptis and bob is that they both use OE (well in
> bob's case it's Windows Mail, but that is in the same codebase *but* is only
> found on Vista) and both have trouble with attributions (but in the case of
> bob, it is far worse). Boy it would be an effort to do all of that
> consistently for years and also to get up to post in your sockpuppet's
> timezone...... I just don't see it.......


You're correct of course. Amazes me people put this much thought into
it when the simple question "What kind of return could I expect from all
that investment to make it worthwhile?' should suffice.



   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 00:29:54
From: Sakari Lund
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:19:30 GMT, "jdeluise" <jdeluise@gmail.com >
wrote:

>
>On 18-Feb-2009, Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> > zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >
>> > > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>> > > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>> >
>> > Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you must
>> > be
>> > pretty dumb.
>>
>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>> accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.
>
>But from a technological standpoint it's even less likely that Whisper,
>*skriptis, and bob are the same person. Not only would a new writing style
>have to be created, but there would have to be usenet accounts opened in
>different countries and the use of proxies in those countries as well.
>Additionally, if you can trust the headers then you would have to conclude
>that different operating systems were in use, different newsreaders, etc.
>The commonality between *skriptis and bob is that they both use OE (well in
>bob's case it's Windows Mail, but that is in the same codebase *but* is only
>found on Vista) and both have trouble with attributions (but in the case of
>bob, it is far worse). Boy it would be an effort to do all of that
>consistently for years and also to get up to post in your sockpuppet's
>timezone...... I just don't see it.......

No, I don't believe they are the same person. They all have different
writing styles, and it really is not easy to write with different
styles. And simply the time zones are too different. Whisper posts in
reasonable times in Australia, skriptis in Europe, and bob in USA. But
it is an interesting phenomenon, bob and skriptis being Whisper fans,
agreeing with everything Whisper ever says, and even saying it all the
time that they agree and what a great poster he is. There is no
comparable situation with any other posters.



    
Date: 19 Feb 2009 22:44:49
From: jdeluise
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.

On 19-Feb-2009, Sakari Lund <sakari.lund@welho.com > wrote:

> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:19:30 GMT, "jdeluise" <jdeluise@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> >
> >On 18-Feb-2009, Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
> >> > zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> >> >
> >> > > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I
> >> > > am
> >> > > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
> >> >
> >> > Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
> >> > must
> >> > be
> >> > pretty dumb.
> >>
> >> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> >> accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.
> >
> >But from a technological standpoint it's even less likely that Whisper,
> >*skriptis, and bob are the same person. Not only would a new writing
> >style
> >have to be created, but there would have to be usenet accounts opened in
> >different countries and the use of proxies in those countries as well.
> >Additionally, if you can trust the headers then you would have to
> >conclude
> >that different operating systems were in use, different newsreaders, etc.
> >
> >The commonality between *skriptis and bob is that they both use OE (well
> >in
> >bob's case it's Windows Mail, but that is in the same codebase *but* is
> >only
> >found on Vista) and both have trouble with attributions (but in the case
> >of
> >bob, it is far worse). Boy it would be an effort to do all of that
> >consistently for years and also to get up to post in your sockpuppet's
> >timezone...... I just don't see it.......
>
> No, I don't believe they are the same person. They all have different
> writing styles, and it really is not easy to write with different
> styles. And simply the time zones are too different. Whisper posts in
> reasonable times in Australia, skriptis in Europe, and bob in USA. But
> it is an interesting phenomenon, bob and skriptis being Whisper fans,
> agreeing with everything Whisper ever says, and even saying it all the
> time that they agree and what a great poster he is. There is no
> comparable situation with any other posters.

Yes, it is a strange phenomenon. I have a feeling it all comes down to
7543. I suspect the simplicity of the formula (and the lack of any real
background on how it was developed) has attracted like-minded people. I'm
not saying any of them are stupid as I don't think they are (they have to
know their arguments are highly illogical at times but do it anyway), but I
think it's the *simplicity* of it combined with an existing feeling of the
relative prestige of the tournaments represented in the formula. I guess
that doesn't explain the sycophantic nature of their relationships, but
maybe they see Whisper as some kind of mentor for having developed something
they like, I don't know.....

At this point though, they have dug themselves into a really big hole and
are forced to defend 7543 and Whisper forever.

I wonder if there is a private 7543 listserv out there:)


     
Date: 20 Feb 2009 01:36:06
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:44:49 GMT, "jdeluise" <jdeluise@gmail.com >
wrote:

>
>On 19-Feb-2009, Sakari Lund <sakari.lund@welho.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 22:19:30 GMT, "jdeluise" <jdeluise@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> >
>> >On 18-Feb-2009, Raja <zepfloyes@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> >> > zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > > Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I
>> >> > > am
>> >> > > 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>> >> >
>> >> > Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>> >> > must
>> >> > be
>> >> > pretty dumb.
>> >>
>> >> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>> >> accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.
>> >
>> >But from a technological standpoint it's even less likely that Whisper,
>> >*skriptis, and bob are the same person. Not only would a new writing
>> >style
>> >have to be created, but there would have to be usenet accounts opened in
>> >different countries and the use of proxies in those countries as well.
>> >Additionally, if you can trust the headers then you would have to
>> >conclude
>> >that different operating systems were in use, different newsreaders, etc.
>> >
>> >The commonality between *skriptis and bob is that they both use OE (well
>> >in
>> >bob's case it's Windows Mail, but that is in the same codebase *but* is
>> >only
>> >found on Vista) and both have trouble with attributions (but in the case
>> >of
>> >bob, it is far worse). Boy it would be an effort to do all of that
>> >consistently for years and also to get up to post in your sockpuppet's
>> >timezone...... I just don't see it.......
>>
>> No, I don't believe they are the same person. They all have different
>> writing styles, and it really is not easy to write with different
>> styles. And simply the time zones are too different. Whisper posts in
>> reasonable times in Australia, skriptis in Europe, and bob in USA. But
>> it is an interesting phenomenon, bob and skriptis being Whisper fans,
>> agreeing with everything Whisper ever says, and even saying it all the
>> time that they agree and what a great poster he is. There is no
>> comparable situation with any other posters.
>
>Yes, it is a strange phenomenon. I have a feeling it all comes down to
>7543. I suspect the simplicity of the formula (and the lack of any real
>background on how it was developed) has attracted like-minded people. I'm
>not saying any of them are stupid as I don't think they are (they have to
>know their arguments are highly illogical at times but do it anyway), but I
>think it's the *simplicity* of it combined with an existing feeling of the
>relative prestige of the tournaments represented in the formula. I guess
>that doesn't explain the sycophantic nature of their relationships, but
>maybe they see Whisper as some kind of mentor for having developed something
>they like, I don't know.....
>
>At this point though, they have dug themselves into a really big hole and
>are forced to defend 7543 and Whisper forever.
>


i am absolutely certain that they both would let whisper fuck them in
the ass if he asked.

and, that's disgusting.


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 08:19:25
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
Raja wrote:
> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>
>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>> must be pretty dumb.
>
> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> accounts.

No, not anyone can do that. Some just can't.
Like you eg., we always recognise your puppet.




  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 18:13:19
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
Raja wrote:
> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you must be
>> pretty dumb.
>
> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> accounts. And you are idiot to believe that nonsense as well.
>


How would you know unless.......?


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 10:42:15
From: DavidW
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
Raja wrote:
> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>
>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>> must be pretty dumb.
>
> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
> accounts.

Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many years it is
obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create another
persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over a long
period. Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying about Graf
and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days. Either that or Whisper is
going to a lot of trouble and effort to keep up the charade. Stop being silly.




   
Date: 19 Feb 2009 07:22:14
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.

"DavidW" <no@email.provided > wrote in message
news:g21nl.14502$g63.12754@newsfe24.iad...
> Raja wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>
>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>>>> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>>
>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>>> must be pretty dumb.
>>
>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>> accounts.
>
> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many years
> it is obvious that they are not the same person. It is not easy to create
> another persona with a different writing style and keep it consistent over
> a long period. Also, Whisper would not say what *skriptis has been saying
> about Graf and Seles in one thread over the past couple of days.


I didn't say anything shocking, I just stated it was silly to suggest that
clay was her worst surface (and at the same time seles' best) when the
results don't confirm that.
There are 2 HC slams per year, one on clay. Graf won FO 6 times and in
ideal circumstances, if she had been equally good/bad on both HC/clay she
would have won 12 HC slams compared to 6 on clay. She won only 9 of those on
HC. If someone is worse on clay than on HC then that person should have
twice as less clay slams. And she doesn't have them, she almost has equall
number of both HC/clay slam titles. So she's not worse on clay than on HC,
but the oposite, HC is her worst surface.

at the same time, seles's ratio is 6-3 in HC-clay slams, so she's equally
good on clay/HC. And when you look at the fact she won 4 AO titles, one even
after the stabing, that she beat Graf there in their post stabbing match,
and lost to her at FO, it's clear Seles' best surface is slow HC. not clay.

And he did say I remind you, clay was Graf's worst surface, and Seles's
best.


It's never about greatness with max, all agree Graf has the best silverware
and she's GOAT.
it was just his fanfucking attempt to make look graf even better, seles even
worse. Nothing new actually.





    
Date: 20 Feb 2009 07:44:50
From: DavidW
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
*skriptis wrote:
> "DavidW" <no@email.provided> wrote in message
> news:g21nl.14502$g63.12754@newsfe24.iad...
>> Raja wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 3:20 pm, "DavidW" <n...@email.provided> wrote:
>>>> zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I
>>>>> am 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.
>>>>
>>>> Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you
>>>> must be pretty dumb.
>>>
>>> You are the dumb fool. Anyone can change style and create two
>>> accounts.
>>
>> Having read thousands of *skriptis's and Whisper's posts over many
>> years it is obvious that they are not the same person. It is not
>> easy to create another persona with a different writing style and
>> keep it consistent over a long period. Also, Whisper would not say
>> what *skriptis has been saying about Graf and Seles in one thread
>> over the past couple of days.
>
>
> I didn't say anything shocking,

I didn't say you did. Settle down.

> I just stated it was silly to suggest
> that clay was her worst surface (and at the same time seles' best)
> when the results don't confirm that.
> There are 2 HC slams per year, one on clay. Graf won FO 6 times and
> in ideal circumstances, if she had been equally good/bad on both
> HC/clay she would have won 12 HC slams compared to 6 on clay. She won
> only 9 of those on HC. If someone is worse on clay than on HC then
> that person should have twice as less clay slams. And she doesn't
> have them, she almost has equall number of both HC/clay slam titles.
> So she's not worse on clay than on HC, but the oposite, HC is her
> worst surface.
> at the same time, seles's ratio is 6-3 in HC-clay slams, so she's
> equally good on clay/HC. And when you look at the fact she won 4 AO
> titles, one even after the stabing, that she beat Graf there in their
> post stabbing match, and lost to her at FO, it's clear Seles' best
> surface is slow HC. not clay.
> And he did say I remind you, clay was Graf's worst surface, and
> Seles's best.
>
>
> It's never about greatness with max, all agree Graf has the best
> silverware and she's GOAT.
> it was just his fanfucking attempt to make look graf even better,
> seles even worse. Nothing new actually.

Whisper is much more pro-Graf than you, which doesn't mean I think you are
anti-Graf, but I don't think he'd have written what you did. That's all I meant.




 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 12:10:23
From:
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 12:55=A0pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 18 Feb, 16:58, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 4:22=A0pm, zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 8:49=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 18, 1:39=A0pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgr=
oup
> > > > > > after this post."
>
> > > > > > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543=
then
> > > > > > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, sinc=
e this
> > > > > > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > > > > > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again..=
..
>
> > > > > Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
> > > > > respond. This is not gonna work
>
> > > > Well, obviously not with that attitude.
>
> > > I will not respond from my side. Lets see if it works.
>
> > ok that's a few on board, + me dave raja and silence fedfucker account
> > for quite a high % of posts atm.
>
> Count me in , I dont think I barely mentioned it anyway in all the
> years i've been online so no problem for me - but as you can see
> someone has made concious effort already to break that.
>
> If theres no opposition though i.e. we dont respond then theres
> nothing to really say unless they create other accounts and reply to
> their own posts - which some folk already do.. ermm- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 02:18:17
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:10:23 -0800 (PST), zepfloyes@yahoo.com wrote:

>On Feb 18, 12:55 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 18 Feb, 16:58, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> > On Feb 18, 4:22 pm, zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>>
>> > > On Feb 18, 8:49 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > On Feb 18, 1:39 pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > On Feb 18, 7:10 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > > > > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
>> > > > > > after this post."
>>
>> > > > > > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
>> > > > > > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
>> > > > > > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>>
>> > > > > > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>>
>> > > > > Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
>> > > > > respond. This is not gonna work
>>
>> > > > Well, obviously not with that attitude.
>>
>> > > I will not respond from my side. Lets see if it works.
>>
>> > ok that's a few on board, + me dave raja and silence fedfucker account
>> > for quite a high % of posts atm.
>>
>> Count me in , I dont think I barely mentioned it anyway in all the
>> years i've been online so no problem for me - but as you can see
>> someone has made concious effort already to break that.
>>
>> If theres no opposition though i.e. we dont respond then theres
>> nothing to really say unless they create other accounts and reply to
>> their own posts - which some folk already do.. ermm- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
>Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
>100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.

so am i.


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 08:20:13
From: DavidW
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
zepfloyes@yahoo.com wrote:
>
> Can you list the real socks in here? I am too lazy to find out. I am
> 100% confident *striptease is Whisper. And so was bob.

Rubbish. If you can't see the difference in styles then, well, you must be
pretty dumb.




 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 10:58:34
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer respond to any of Whisper or *striptease
On 18 Feb, 17:21, zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> > after this post."
>
> > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> This will actually help. Lets not respond to Whisper or *striptease
> (both are the same guy)

Thats what youd have to do - effectively killfile the great defiler
and all his subordinates ..
Perhaps better still would be to ban the mention of PS altogether
though - hes had more than enough airtime thanks to acolytes


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 10:55:07
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On 18 Feb, 16:58, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 4:22=A0pm, zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 8:49=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 1:39=A0pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgrou=
p
> > > > > after this post."
>
> > > > > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 t=
hen
> > > > > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since =
this
> > > > > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > > > > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> > > > Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
> > > > respond. This is not gonna work
>
> > > Well, obviously not with that attitude.
>
> > I will not respond from my side. Lets see if it works.
>
> ok that's a few on board, + me dave raja and silence fedfucker account
> for quite a high % of posts atm.

Count me in , I dont think I barely mentioned it anyway in all the
years i've been online so no problem for me - but as you can see
someone has made concious effort already to break that.

If theres no opposition though i.e. we dont respond then theres
nothing to really say unless they create other accounts and reply to
their own posts - which some folk already do.. ermm


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 09:21:41
From:
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer respond to any of Whisper or *striptease
On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> after this post."
>
> If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....

This will actually help. Lets not respond to Whisper or *striptease
(both are the same guy)



 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 09:18:42
From:
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 10:58=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 4:22=A0pm, zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 8:49=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 1:39=A0pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgrou=
p
> > > > > after this post."
>
> > > > > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 t=
hen
> > > > > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since =
this
> > > > > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > > > > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> > > > Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
> > > > respond. This is not gonna work
>
> > > Well, obviously not with that attitude.
>
> > I will not respond from my side. Lets see if it works.
>
> ok that's a few on board, + me dave raja and silence fedfucker account
> for quite a high % of posts atm.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I hardly respond to 7543, so it wont help much.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 08:58:37
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 4:22=A0pm, zepflo...@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Feb 18, 8:49=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 1:39=A0pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> > > > after this post."
>
> > > > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 the=
n
> > > > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since th=
is
> > > > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > > > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> > > Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
> > > respond. This is not gonna work
>
> > Well, obviously not with that attitude.
>
> I will not respond from my side. Lets see if it works.

ok that's a few on board, + me dave raja and silence fedfucker account
for quite a high % of posts atm.


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 09:24:03
From: drew
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 9:21 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com > wrote:
.

> that's correct. whisper sounds like a true schizo.

Most confuse schizophrenia and dissociative identity or multiple
personality disorder. This is no joke. I think Whisper has this
disorder. The binding thread that joins these personalities is the
tennis thing and specifically the fixation upon Sampras. The
*Striptease character is older, he even writes as if English is his
second language.

The bob character is more effeminate and has fewer grandiose delusions
of Whisper such as the tendency to brag about the ultimate perfection
of his physique, his intelligence, the beauty of his wife, his wealth,
his virility, etcetera.




   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 17:33:04
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
drew wrote:
> On Feb 18, 9:21 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> .
>
>> that's correct. whisper sounds like a true schizo.
>
> Most confuse schizophrenia and dissociative identity or multiple
> personality disorder. This is no joke. I think Whisper has this
> disorder. The binding thread that joins these personalities is the
> tennis thing and specifically the fixation upon Sampras. The
> *Striptease character is older, he even writes as if English is his
> second language.
>
> The bob character is more effeminate and has fewer grandiose delusions
> of Whisper such as the tendency to brag about the ultimate perfection
> of his physique, his intelligence, the beauty of his wife, his wealth,
> his virility, etcetera.
>
>


Wow you sure spend a lot of time thinking up complex, convoluted
scenarios. I bet you have little hair - am I right?

The simplest answers are always the best. It would take a hell of a lot
of work maintaining different rst personas & not once trip up no? It's
like the 911/moon landing doubters - surely woulda been easy to expose
with all the moving parts having to be in sync.

To me it appears far more likely some posters agree with me (which it
must be said is a very mainstream view in the real world) than the
complexity of myriad personality disorders, maintaining detailed
separate accounts etc - but I guess it must be more fun in your head -
good imagination man. Maybe you can write some short mystery stories &
we'll judge them on rst? Start with a tennis theme - I'll throw in some
refrences & see what you can come up with;

- Federer
- Cross dresser
- Wimbledon
- Rafa
- suicide




   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 01:28:24
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:24:03 -0800 (PST), drew <drew@technologist.com >
wrote:

>On Feb 18, 9:21 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>.
>
>> that's correct. whisper sounds like a true schizo.
>
>Most confuse schizophrenia and dissociative identity or multiple
>personality disorder. This is no joke. I think Whisper has this
>disorder. The binding thread that joins these personalities is the
>tennis thing and specifically the fixation upon Sampras. The
>*Striptease character is older, he even writes as if English is his
>second language.
>
>The bob character is more effeminate and has fewer grandiose delusions
>of Whisper such as the tendency to brag about the ultimate perfection
>of his physique, his intelligence, the beauty of his wife, his wealth,
>his virility, etcetera.
>


wow ! you really know your shit man.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 08:25:36
From:
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 9:05=A0am, guyana <guyanper...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 9:49=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > On Feb 18, 1:39=A0pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> > > > after this post."
>
> > > > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 the=
n
> > > > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since th=
is
> > > > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > > > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> > > Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
> > > respond. This is not gonna work
>
> > Well, obviously not with that attitude.
>
> yes and no more fucking lists from Rajay??- Hide quoted text -

Hey fuck you man. The lists I post are all interesting and interested
people discuss it. Some sociopaths like amy (he is a guy) from the
Beatles newgroup pop in for no reason over here. I cant do anything
about that.



  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 18:11:23
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
zepfloyes@yahoo.com wrote:
> On Feb 18, 9:05 am, guyana <guyanper...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 9:49 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 18, 1:39 pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 7:10 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
>>>>> after this post."
>>>>> If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
>>>>> the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
>>>>> perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>>>>> so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>>>> Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
>>>> respond. This is not gonna work
>>> Well, obviously not with that attitude.
>> yes and no more fucking lists from Rajay??- Hide quoted text -
>
> Hey fuck you man. The lists I post are all interesting and interested
> people discuss it. Some sociopaths like amy (he is a guy) from the
> Beatles newgroup pop in for no reason over here. I cant do anything
> about that.
>


amy adds far more value to rst than you do.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 08:24:15
From:
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 10:09=A0am, "Silence, Fedfucker!"
<thetruetennisg...@hotmail.co.uk > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 3:53 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:10:24 -0800 (PST), Professor X
>
> > <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >"From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> > >after this post."
>
> > >If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> > >the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> > >perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > >so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> > i'll try my best but that little fart from newcastle can be sooooo
> > irritating !
>
> yes and even worse is that turd who follows him around known as
> Striptease. I wonder where Bob has got to?

Striptease is the most annoying pest out here.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 08:22:29
From:
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 8:49=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 1:39=A0pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> > > after this post."
>
> > > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> > > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> > > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> > Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
> > respond. This is not gonna work
>
> Well, obviously not with that attitude.

I will not respond from my side. Lets see if it works.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 08:09:12
From: Silence, Fedfucker!
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 3:53 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:10:24 -0800 (PST), Professor X
>
> <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >"From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> >after this post."
>
> >If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> >the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> >perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> >so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> i'll try my best but that little fart from newcastle can be sooooo
> irritating !

yes and even worse is that turd who follows him around known as
Striptease. I wonder where Bob has got to?


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 15:53:21
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all, negative or positive, FULLSTOP.
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:10:24 -0800 (PST), Professor X
<suebokaian@hotmail.com > wrote:

>
>
>"From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
>after this post."
>
>If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
>the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
>perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
>so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....


i'll try my best but that little fart from newcastle can be sooooo
irritating !


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 07:50:26
From: drew
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 8:10 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> after this post."
>
> If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....


I feel obliged to answer if somebody asks "What the hell is this 7553
stuff?" Otherwise it's a dead subject discussed by the brain dead
element in rst.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 07:05:03
From: guyana
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 9:49=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 1:39=A0pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> > > after this post."
>
> > > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> > > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> > > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> > Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
> > respond. This is not gonna work
>
> Well, obviously not with that attitude.

yes and no more fucking lists from Rajay??


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 06:49:41
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 1:39=A0pm, Raja <zepflo...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> > after this post."
>
> > If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> > the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> > perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> > so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....
>
> Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
> respond. This is not gonna work

Well, obviously not with that attitude.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 05:39:35
From: Raja
Subject: Re: Petition to no longer discuss 7543 on this newsgroup at all,
On Feb 18, 7:10=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> "From now on I will never utter the numbers 7543 on this newsgroup
> after this post."
>
> If we all sign this petition and never use the terminology 7543 then
> the shit will die out. This INCLUDES arguing against 7543, since this
> perpetuates it just as much as Whisper's bullshitting.
>
> so my names down, i'm never going to type those numbers again....

Whisper and his trolls will continue to do so and someone will
respond. This is not gonna work