tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 17 Jan 2009 16:21:26
From: wkhedr
Subject: Those that think Murray did not play well in the USO against Federer.
will find out that he played a great match but he was outplayed and
out-classed by Federer.




 
Date: 17 Jan 2009 19:40:38
From: wkhedr
Subject: Re: Those that think Murray did not play well in the USO against
On Jan 17, 8:48=A0pm, "Dr. GroundAxe" <ground...@hotmail.co.uk > wrote:
> Oh please, there isn't a single tennis commentator that thought Murray wa=
s
> playing well. Everyone picked up on the fatigue (both emotional and
> physical) and this was manifested by him standing much further back in th=
e
> court than usual and hitting everything short, allowing the less astute
> commentators to further praise Federer's aggressive play. Had Murray kept=
a
> reasonable length on his shots Federer would not have been able to hit al=
l
> those winners.
>
> "wkhedr" <wkh...@my-deja.com> wrote in message
>
> news:6d3dcb99-bdd8-46ac-bf94-72487f2a5dfc@h16g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
>
>
>
> > will find out that he played a great match but he was outplayed and
> > out-classed by Federer.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

I said people will find out that Murray played well. Murray didn't
lose his first two service games, no emotional fear, etc. And you say
Murray was standing back, Murray always stays back, he tries to be a
practice wall, waiting for errors from his opponents.


 
Date: 17 Jan 2009 19:25:14
From: VJ
Subject: Re: Those that think Murray did not play well in the USO against
On Jan 17, 8:59=A0pm, "Stapler" <d...@d.com > wrote:
> "Dr. GroundAxe" <ground...@hotmail.co.uk> wrote in message
>
> news:9Uvcl.21836$Sp5.15710@text.news.virginmedia.com...
>
> > Oh please, there isn't a single tennis commentator that thought Murray =
was
> > playing well. Everyone picked up on the fatigue (both emotional and
> > physical) and this was manifested by him standing much further back in =
the
> > court than usual and hitting everything short, allowing the less astute
> > commentators to further praise Federer's aggressive play. Had Murray ke=
pt
> > a reasonable length on his shots Federer would not have been able to hi=
t
> > all those winners.
>
> Hallelejah! Enough with the Fedfuckers and their historical "truths".
> Practically half the slam finals he's played against exhausted players!
> Doesn't anyone remember 2007 Wimbledon against an exhausted Nadal?
> The fact that Nadal had him 15-40 in the 5th set despite being almost dea=
d
> tired is more proof of that Federer is a fraud. He can only beat more
> talented
> players when they are tired.

Why are these highly fatigued players showing up in slam finals
whereas Federer is fresh as a daisy? This Fed must be one lucky guy to
be so fresh while everyone else is so tired all the time.


 
Date: 18 Jan 2009 01:48:53
From: Dr. GroundAxe
Subject: Re: Those that think Murray did not play well in the USO against Federer.
Oh please, there isn't a single tennis commentator that thought Murray was
playing well. Everyone picked up on the fatigue (both emotional and
physical) and this was manifested by him standing much further back in the
court than usual and hitting everything short, allowing the less astute
commentators to further praise Federer's aggressive play. Had Murray kept a
reasonable length on his shots Federer would not have been able to hit all
those winners.


"wkhedr" <wkhedr@my-deja.com > wrote in message
news:6d3dcb99-bdd8-46ac-bf94-72487f2a5dfc@h16g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> will find out that he played a great match but he was outplayed and
> out-classed by Federer.



  
Date: 18 Jan 2009 01:59:03
From: Stapler
Subject: Re: Those that think Murray did not play well in the USO against Federer.
"Dr. GroundAxe" <groundaxe@hotmail.co.uk > wrote in message
news:9Uvcl.21836$Sp5.15710@text.news.virginmedia.com...
> Oh please, there isn't a single tennis commentator that thought Murray was
> playing well. Everyone picked up on the fatigue (both emotional and
> physical) and this was manifested by him standing much further back in the
> court than usual and hitting everything short, allowing the less astute
> commentators to further praise Federer's aggressive play. Had Murray kept
> a reasonable length on his shots Federer would not have been able to hit
> all those winners.
>


Hallelejah! Enough with the Fedfuckers and their historical "truths".
Practically half the slam finals he's played against exhausted players!
Doesn't anyone remember 2007 Wimbledon against an exhausted Nadal?
The fact that Nadal had him 15-40 in the 5th set despite being almost dead
tired is more proof of that Federer is a fraud. He can only beat more
talented
players when they are tired.



 
Date: 18 Jan 2009 01:26:39
From: Stapler
Subject: Re: Those that think Murray did not play well in the USO against Federer.
"wkhedr" <wkhedr@my-deja.com > wrote in message
news:6d3dcb99-bdd8-46ac-bf94-72487f2a5dfc@h16g2000yqj.googlegroups.com...
> will find out that he played a great match but he was outplayed and
> out-classed by Federer.


Bullshit. Murray was dead tired from playing 3 straight days and Feddyboy
got a full day off!