tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 02 Feb 2009 00:39:07
From: Iceberg
Subject: Waiting for Dave to say...
that Nadal didn't actually win the Australian Open! :)






 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 06:47:23
From: Fan
Subject: Re: Waiting for Dave to say...
On Feb 2, 3:16=A0pm, TT <g...@Olympics.org > wrote:
> Fan wrote:
> > On Feb 2, 2:28 pm, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
> >> Superdave wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:39:07 GMT, "Iceberg"
> >>> <big_bad_iceb...@moc.oohay> wrote:
> >>>> that Nadal didn't actually win the Australian Open! :)
> >>> Correct. Nadal did *not* win the AO. Roger *lost* it.
> >> Roger is such a pussy.
>
> > Nadal won fair and square but this is monkey talk. Have a banana.
> > Better yet, have two bananas...
>
> Silence, nigger.

We call them African-Americans, you racist little monkey and no more
bananas for you :-(


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 05:31:36
From: Fan
Subject: Re: Waiting for Dave to say...
On Feb 2, 2:28=A0pm, TT <g...@Olympics.org > wrote:
> Superdave wrote:
> > On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:39:07 GMT, "Iceberg"
> > <big_bad_iceb...@moc.oohay> wrote:
>
> >> that Nadal didn't actually win the Australian Open! :)
>
> > Correct. Nadal did *not* win the AO. Roger *lost* it.
>
> Roger is such a pussy.

Nadal won fair and square but this is monkey talk. Have a banana.
Better yet, have two bananas...


  
Date: 02 Feb 2009 16:16:26
From: TT
Subject: Re: Waiting for Dave to say...
Fan wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2:28 pm, TT <g...@Olympics.org> wrote:
>> Superdave wrote:
>>> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:39:07 GMT, "Iceberg"
>>> <big_bad_iceb...@moc.oohay> wrote:
>>>> that Nadal didn't actually win the Australian Open! :)
>>> Correct. Nadal did *not* win the AO. Roger *lost* it.
>> Roger is such a pussy.
>
> Nadal won fair and square but this is monkey talk. Have a banana.
> Better yet, have two bananas...

Silence, nigger.

--
"Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"


 
Date: 02 Feb 2009 05:34:45
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Waiting for Dave to say...
On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:39:07 GMT, "Iceberg"
<big_bad_iceberg@moc.oohay > wrote:

>that Nadal didn't actually win the Australian Open! :)
>


Correct. Nadal did *not* win the AO. Roger *lost* it.


  
Date: 02 Feb 2009 15:28:54
From: TT
Subject: Re: Waiting for Dave to say...
Superdave wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Feb 2009 00:39:07 GMT, "Iceberg"
> <big_bad_iceberg@moc.oohay> wrote:
>
>> that Nadal didn't actually win the Australian Open! :)
>>
>
>
> Correct. Nadal did *not* win the AO. Roger *lost* it.

Roger is such a pussy.

--
"Now I have so many dreams to chase - the French Open, an Olympic
singles gold medal in London in 2012, the Davis Cup for Switzerland"


 
Date: 01 Feb 2009 17:13:16
From:
Subject: Re: Waiting for Dave to say...
On Feb 1, 7:39=A0pm, "Iceberg" <big_bad_iceb...@moc.oohay > wrote:
> that Nadal didn't actually win the Australian Open! :)


More likely to say that Nadal's AO is destined to have an asterisk
next to it due to Nadal's juicing--not that I'm saying I believe that
or anything. :)