tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 27 Jan 2009 04:38:41
From: Professor X
Subject: Why is being a Fed-troll more acceptable than being an anti-fed
Discuss.




 
Date: 27 Jan 2009 14:07:09
From:
Subject: Re: Why is being a Fed-troll more acceptable than being an anti-fed
On Jan 27, 7:41=A0am, Giovanna <giovanapellici...@yahoo.com > wrote:
> .
>
> Fed trolls are nicer~~

In my experience, this is true.


 
Date: 27 Jan 2009 13:36:22
From: ca1houn
Subject: Re: Why is being a Fed-troll more acceptable than being an anti-fed
On Jan 27, 4:43=A0am, "Rodjk #613" <rjka...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Jan 27, 6:38=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Discuss.
>
> It is easier to talk nice about a 13X slam winner who is considered
> one of the classiest guys around than it is to talk bad about him?
>
> Rodjk #613

nobel prize please that one of the most greatest comment made


 
Date: 27 Jan 2009 13:09:10
From: Dave Hazelwood
Subject: Re: Why is being a Fed-troll more acceptable than being an anti-fed troll?
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 04:38:41 -0800 (PST), Professor X
<suebokaian@hotmail.com > wrote:

>Discuss.

Fed trolls win fair and square all of the time and Rogers records are
about to top Sampras 5 years earlier than Pete.


 
Date: 27 Jan 2009 04:43:03
From: Rodjk #613
Subject: Re: Why is being a Fed-troll more acceptable than being an anti-fed
On Jan 27, 6:38=A0am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Discuss.

It is easier to talk nice about a 13X slam winner who is considered
one of the classiest guys around than it is to talk bad about him?

Rodjk #613


 
Date: 27 Jan 2009 04:41:02
From: Giovanna
Subject: Re: Why is being a Fed-troll more acceptable than being an anti-fed
.

Fed trolls are nicer~~