tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 18 Feb 2009 01:53:58
From: Professor X
Subject: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
served for the match and lost against simon
took nadal to 3 sets
and has beaten berdych....

maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.




 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 17:55:35
From: jem*gal
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 19 Feb, 18:46, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> ghell666 wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 1:19 am, "xami...@gmail.com" <xami...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On 18 f=E9v, 18:20, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
> >>> "Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon....@gmmmmail.com> wrote in message
> >>>news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
> >>>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
> >>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
> >>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
> >>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
> >>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
> >>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
> >>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont hav=
e a
> >>>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for =
at
> >>>>>>>>> least few years
> >>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discus=
sion,
> >>>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
> >>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived fo=
r all
> >>>>>>> to see.
> >>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using =
a
> >>>>>>> Sampras like game.
> >>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see R=
oger
> >>>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
> >>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> >>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when =
fed
> >>>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> >>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
> >>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on =
7543
> >>>> and
> >>>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
> >>> What would be fun in that?
> >> Having whsikey's fav "white knight" (Nadal) overtaking the one he was
> >> supposed to protect (in whiskey's *brain*) would be fun anyway (even
> >> if Federer wasn't to kill Pete on the idiotic 7543).
>
> >> In fact, I'll root for Nadal to do so, just to read whiskey's
> >> comments, just to see how he will change his mind about Nadal... And
> >> who he will pick to stop Nadal from passing Sampras.
>
> >> Share & Enjoy,
> >> Manolo
>
> > Me too , I hope both of them ( Nadal and Federer ) break Petes record
> > so it diminishes its ever more ... ( all within in a decade too )
>
> That suggests you are an active Sampras-hater rather then being ambivalen=
t.

You make that sound like a bad thing



  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 11:26:39
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
"jem*gal" <matt.tippen@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:0f56f6d0-dff9-4b66-941c-aa200f1b2a59@j35g2000yqh.googlegroups.com...
> On 19 Feb, 18:46, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> ghell666 wrote:
>> > On Feb 19, 1:19 am, "xami...@gmail.com" <xami...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On 18 fv, 18:20, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>>
>> >>> "Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon....@gmmmmail.com> wrote in message
>> >>>news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
>> >>>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>> >>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>> >>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>> >>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>> >>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>> >>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>> >>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont
>> >>>>>>>>> have a
>> >>>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for
>> >>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>> least few years
>> >>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>> >>>>>>>> discussion,
>> >>>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>> >>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived
>> >>>>>>> for all
>> >>>>>>> to see.
>> >>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using
>> >>>>>>> a
>> >>>>>>> Sampras like game.
>> >>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
>> >>>>>> Roger
>> >>>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>> >>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>> >>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when
>> >>>>> fed
>> >>>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>> >>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>> >>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on
>> >>>> 7543
>> >>>> and
>> >>>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>> >>> What would be fun in that?
>> >> Having whsikey's fav "white knight" (Nadal) overtaking the one he was
>> >> supposed to protect (in whiskey's *brain*) would be fun anyway (even
>> >> if Federer wasn't to kill Pete on the idiotic 7543).
>>
>> >> In fact, I'll root for Nadal to do so, just to read whiskey's
>> >> comments, just to see how he will change his mind about Nadal... And
>> >> who he will pick to stop Nadal from passing Sampras.
>>
>> >> Share & Enjoy,
>> >> Manolo
>>
>> > Me too , I hope both of them ( Nadal and Federer ) break Petes record
>> > so it diminishes its ever more ... ( all within in a decade too )
>>
>> That suggests you are an active Sampras-hater rather then being
>> ambivalent.
>
> You make that sound like a bad thing

it is, cos in reality you're all bitter Fedfans.



 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 17:54:08
From: jem*gal
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 19 Feb, 12:34, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 19, 12:11=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Professor X wrote:
> > > On Feb 18, 12:14 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> > >> ghell666 wrote:
> > >>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>>> served for the match and lost against simon
> > >>>> took nadal to 3 sets
> > >>>> and has beaten berdych....
> > >>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
> > >>> Maybe ...
> > >>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> > >>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> > >>> least few years
> > >> He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.=
1.
>
> > > Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem tha=
n
> > > they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.
>
> > I shouldn't be surprised but I am - this is retardo.sport.tennis.
>
> And you have the all-time high post count in "Retardo-sport-tennis" as
> you call it.

and that not even including the flies he attracts with it


 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 13:05:07
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 19, 6:51=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> Professor X wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 12:16 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> >> Javier Gonzalez wrote:
> >>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
> >>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
> >>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
> >>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
> >>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
> >>>>>>>> Maybe ...
> >>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have=
a
> >>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for a=
t
> >>>>>>>> least few years
> >>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discuss=
ion,
> >>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
> >>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for=
all
> >>>>>> to see.
> >>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
> >>>>>> Sampras like game.
> >>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Ro=
ger
> >>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
> >>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> >>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when f=
ed
> >>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> >>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
> >>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7=
543 and
> >>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
> >> There will be no squirming. =A0If they can do that then my hat's off.
> >> That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. =A0But I'm
> >> sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve it.
> >> You're free to celebrate now if you like.
>
> > no-one gives a shit about the whispy system,... only one that matters
> > is slam TOTAL...
>
> That would mean AO champ is no greater than Wimbledon champ. =A0I guess
> Djoker wouldn't swap his AO trophy with Stich's Wimbledon?

To counter that i'm sure that fed would be willing to switch one us
open for a french, even though the french is '4' and us o '5'


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 22:15:32
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 19, 6:51 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Professor X wrote:
>>> On Feb 19, 12:16 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>>> Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>>>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont
>>>>>>>>>> have a hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on
>>>>>>>>>> clay for at least few years
>>>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>>>>>>>>> discussion, this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived
>>>>>>>> for all to see.
>>>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without
>>>>>>>> using a Sampras like game.
>>>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to
>>>>>>> see Roger get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up
>>>>>> if/when fed does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams
>>>>>> while the afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83
>>>>> on 7543 and Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the
>>>>> squirm factor.
>>>> There will be no squirming. If they can do that then my hat's off.
>>>> That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. But I'm
>>>> sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve
>>>> it. You're free to celebrate now if you like.
>>
>>> no-one gives a shit about the whispy system,... only one that
>>> matters is slam TOTAL...
>>
>> That would mean AO champ is no greater than Wimbledon champ. I guess
>> Djoker wouldn't swap his AO trophy with Stich's Wimbledon?
>
> To counter that i'm sure that fed would be willing to switch one us
> open for a french, even though the french is '4' and us o '5'

tricky. if he does that he also loses HC achievement GOAT title.




 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 12:43:36
From: Scott
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 19, 3:22=A0pm, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr > wrote:
> Scott wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 1:44 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
> >> He means you don't actually have to like the goat to acknowledge the
> >> fucking obvious. You really must be a clown to think Jimbo has pretty
> >> much same title to goat as Sampras.
>
> > Jimbo has a claim, which a real Tier One Analyst (and not a Tier One
> > Troll) would acknowledge. =A0Jimmy was prevented from competing in the
> > 1974 FO when he was the favorite for the event. =A0Jimmy then skipped
> > the event for a few years as a protest.
>
> What kind of idiotic claim is that?
>
> Is that the same claim Agassi has on those Wimbledons he missed because h=
e
> refused to wear white?

Whisper-Sockpuppet: Jimmy Connors played in an era when total slams
was not the barometer for GOAT. That's what my post conveys.



  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 20:22:07
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Scott wrote:
> On Feb 19, 3:22 pm, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>> Scott wrote:
>>> On Feb 19, 1:44 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>>> He means you don't actually have to like the goat to acknowledge the
>>>> fucking obvious. You really must be a clown to think Jimbo has pretty
>>>> much same title to goat as Sampras.
>>> Jimbo has a claim, which a real Tier One Analyst (and not a Tier One
>>> Troll) would acknowledge. Jimmy was prevented from competing in the
>>> 1974 FO when he was the favorite for the event. Jimmy then skipped
>>> the event for a few years as a protest.
>> What kind of idiotic claim is that?
>>
>> Is that the same claim Agassi has on those Wimbledons he missed because he
>> refused to wear white?
>
> Whisper-Sockpuppet: Jimmy Connors played in an era when total slams
> was not the barometer for GOAT. That's what my post conveys.
>


That isn't exactly true. Arthur Ashe said '71 AO was still a slam & one
of the top 4 - presumably that covers Jimbo's era.



 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 10:58:35
From: Scott
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 19, 1:44=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
>
> He means you don't actually have to like the goat to acknowledge the
> fucking obvious. =A0You really must be a clown to think Jimbo has pretty
> much same title to goat as Sampras.

Jimbo has a claim, which a real Tier One Analyst (and not a Tier One
Troll) would acknowledge. Jimmy was prevented from competing in the
1974 FO when he was the favorite for the event. Jimmy then skipped
the event for a few years as a protest.

if you think this NG is filled with clowns then perhaps you could find
another? rec.sport.tennis.trolls might suit you better. ;


  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 20:07:34
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Scott wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:44 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> He means you don't actually have to like the goat to acknowledge the
>> fucking obvious. You really must be a clown to think Jimbo has pretty
>> much same title to goat as Sampras.
>
> Jimbo has a claim, which a real Tier One Analyst (and not a Tier One
> Troll) would acknowledge. Jimmy was prevented from competing in the
> 1974 FO when he was the favorite for the event. Jimmy then skipped
> the event for a few years as a protest.
>

Jimbo does not have a claim to goat. He is tier 2 though, very
marginally ahead of Mac & well ahead of Lendl, Becker & Edberg.


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 21:22:21
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Scott wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:44 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> He means you don't actually have to like the goat to acknowledge the
>> fucking obvious. You really must be a clown to think Jimbo has pretty
>> much same title to goat as Sampras.
>
> Jimbo has a claim, which a real Tier One Analyst (and not a Tier One
> Troll) would acknowledge. Jimmy was prevented from competing in the
> 1974 FO when he was the favorite for the event. Jimmy then skipped
> the event for a few years as a protest.


What kind of idiotic claim is that?

Is that the same claim Agassi has on those Wimbledons he missed because he
refused to wear white?




 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 05:04:19
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 19, 12:58=A0pm, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr > wrote:
> Professor X wrote:
> > On Feb 19, 12:10 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> >> Professor X wrote:
> >>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>
> >>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
> >>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
> >>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
> >>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
> >>>>>>> Maybe ...
> >>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont
> >>>>>>> have a hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on
> >>>>>>> clay for at least few years
> >>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
> >>>>>> discussion, this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
> >>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived
> >>>>> for all to see.
> >>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
> >>>>> Sampras like game.
> >>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
> >>>> Roger get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>
> >>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> >>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when
> >>> fed does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> >>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>
> >> er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
> >> nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. What
> >> the fuck are you smoking? Can you demonstrate why future historians
> >> will be overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?
>
> >> Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. You people never seem
> >> to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
> >> stupidity in this ng.
>
> > huh you are the one who is a moron.... you talk about historians
> > looking back on a 1time ao winner and 0 time gslam champ. HOWEVER you
> > tipped Murray to have AT LEAST TWICE AS GOOD A CAREER AS DJOKOVIC
> > after the USOPEN which would mean 2 slams at least whispshit (and
> > that's if djoko doesn't win anymore --- very very unlikely....
> > I'd be highly surprised if murray and djok didn't get at least two
> > each. You are the one with Seibs... (Sampras Era is best syndrome)
>
> =A0You missed my point.

No it's you and whispy who are like broken needles, missing the point.


 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 04:34:48
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 19, 12:16=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> Javier Gonzalez wrote:
> > Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>
> >>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
> >>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
> >>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
> >>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
> >>>>>> Maybe ...
> >>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> >>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> >>>>>> least few years
> >>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussio=
n,
> >>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
> >>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for a=
ll
> >>>> to see.
> >>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
> >>>> Sampras like game.
> >>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roge=
r
> >>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
> >> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> >> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
> >> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> >> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>
> > On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 754=
3 and
> > Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>
> There will be no squirming. =A0If they can do that then my hat's off.
> That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. =A0But I'm
> sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve it.
> You're free to celebrate now if you like.

no-one gives a shit about the whispy system,... only one that matters
is slam TOTAL...


  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 11:26:39
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
"Professor X" <suebokaian@hotmail.com > wrote in message
news:0de222d9-a61a-4b9c-8eb9-4595a75662b3@l16g2000yqo.googlegroups.com...
> On Feb 19, 12:16 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>> > Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>
>> >>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>> >>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>> >>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>> >>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>> >>>>>> Maybe ...
>> >>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>> >>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>> >>>>>> least few years
>> >>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>> >>>>> discussion,
>> >>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>> >>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for
>> >>>> all
>> >>>> to see.
>> >>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>> >>>> Sampras like game.
>> >>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
>> >>> Roger
>> >>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>> >> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>> >> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>> >> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>> >> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>
>> > On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on
>> > 7543 and
>> > Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>>
>> There will be no squirming. If they can do that then my hat's off.
>> That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. But I'm
>> sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve it.
>> You're free to celebrate now if you like.
>
> no-one gives a shit about the whispy system,... only one that matters
> is slam TOTAL...

as of 1st Jan 2009 Fed's claim is out the window.



  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 05:51:46
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 19, 12:16 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>>>> least few years
>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>>>>> to see.
>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7543 and
>>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>> There will be no squirming. If they can do that then my hat's off.
>> That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. But I'm
>> sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve it.
>> You're free to celebrate now if you like.
>
> no-one gives a shit about the whispy system,... only one that matters
> is slam TOTAL...


That would mean AO champ is no greater than Wimbledon champ. I guess
Djoker wouldn't swap his AO trophy with Stich's Wimbledon?


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 12:52:19
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 04:34:48 -0800 (PST), Professor X
<suebokaian@hotmail.com > wrote:

>On Feb 19, 12:16pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>> > Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>
>> >>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>> >>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>> >>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>> >>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>> >>>>>> Maybe ...
>> >>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>> >>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>> >>>>>> least few years
>> >>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>> >>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>> >>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>> >>>> to see.
>> >>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>> >>>> Sampras like game.
>> >>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>> >>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>> >> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>> >> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>> >> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>> >> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>
>> > On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7543 and
>> > Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>>
>> There will be no squirming. If they can do that then my hat's off.
>> That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. But I'm
>> sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve it.
>> You're free to celebrate now if you like.
>
>no-one gives a shit about the whispy system,... only one that matters
>is slam TOTAL...


I am not sure even slam total matters that much. It didn't before Pete
and looks like it may be the same after Pete.

Remember, this slam mania was only a product of madison avenue to draw
attention to $$$$ in the us tennis tv market.

The rest of the world is smarter than that.

Pete was a great tennis player, sure. But to say he was the best ever
because he won the most slams is flawed (he also lost the most!).

I think Borg, Laver, Lendl, Connors, Federer and McEnroe were/are as
good or better.

This slam=goat thing is an infant in a sport whose beginning has
outlived every person alive today so I wouldn't attach must to it for
at least another 20 or 30 years because it is probably just a passing
fancy.


 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 04:34:09
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 19, 12:11=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> Professor X wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 12:14 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
> >> ghell666 wrote:
> >>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> served for the match and lost against simon
> >>>> took nadal to 3 sets
> >>>> and has beaten berdych....
> >>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
> >>> Maybe ...
> >>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> >>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> >>> least few years
> >> He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>
> > Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem than
> > they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.
>
> I shouldn't be surprised but I am - this is retardo.sport.tennis.

And you have the all-time high post count in "Retardo-sport-tennis" as
you call it.


  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 05:50:46
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 19, 12:11 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Professor X wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 12:14 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>>> ghell666 wrote:
>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>> least few years
>>>> He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>>> Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem than
>>> they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.
>> I shouldn't be surprised but I am - this is retardo.sport.tennis.
>
> And you have the all-time high post count in "Retardo-sport-tennis" as
> you call it.


Now you know why. If this were a high quality tennis group we wouldn't
be wasting time thrashing out bullshit claims like 'Is Wimbledon really
no1? Huh no one told me?' etc



   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 11:26:39
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
"Whisper" <beaver999@ozemail.com.au > wrote in message
news:499daa09$0$654$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> Professor X wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 12:11 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>> Professor X wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 12:14 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>>>> ghell666 wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>> least few years
>>>>> He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>>>> Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem than
>>>> they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.
>>> I shouldn't be surprised but I am - this is retardo.sport.tennis.
>>
>> And you have the all-time high post count in "Retardo-sport-tennis" as
>> you call it.
>
>
> Now you know why. If this were a high quality tennis group we wouldn't be
> wasting time thrashing out bullshit claims like 'Is Wimbledon really no1?
> Huh no one told me?' etc

yeah the longest thread of the past year has been about how Wimbledon isn't
the most prestigious tournament, no it's some unknown Asian one, LOL!



 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 04:32:33
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 19, 12:10=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> Professor X wrote:
> > On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>
> >> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
> >>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
> >>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
> >>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
> >>>>> Maybe ...
> >>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> >>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> >>>>> least few years
> >>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion=
,
> >>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
> >>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for al=
l
> >>> to see.
> >>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
> >>> Sampras like game.
> >> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
> >> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>
> > Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> > djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
> > does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> > afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>
> er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
> nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. =A0What the
> fuck are you smoking? =A0Can you demonstrate why future historians will b=
e
> overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?
>
> Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. =A0You people never seem
> to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
> stupidity in this ng.

huh you are the one who is a moron.... you talk about historians
looking back on a 1time ao winner and 0 time gslam champ. HOWEVER you
tipped Murray to have AT LEAST TWICE AS GOOD A CAREER AS DJOKOVIC
after the USOPEN which would mean 2 slams at least whispshit (and
that's if djoko doesn't win anymore --- very very unlikely....
I'd be highly surprised if murray and djok didn't get at least two
each. You are the one with Seibs... (Sampras Era is best syndrome)


  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 05:49:23
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 19, 12:10 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Professor X wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>>> least few years
>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>>>> to see.
>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>> er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
>> nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. What the
>> fuck are you smoking? Can you demonstrate why future historians will be
>> overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?
>>
>> Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. You people never seem
>> to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
>> stupidity in this ng.
>
> huh you are the one who is a moron.... you talk about historians
> looking back on a 1time ao winner and 0 time gslam champ. HOWEVER you
> tipped Murray to have AT LEAST TWICE AS GOOD A CAREER AS DJOKOVIC
> after the USOPEN which would mean 2 slams at least


Correct. That is a prediction based on a range of factors, however I'm
not about to start giving credit to what players might achieve.


> whispshit (and
> that's if djoko doesn't win anymore --- very very unlikely....
> I'd be highly surprised if murray and djok didn't get at least two
> each. You are the one with Seibs... (Sampras Era is best syndrome)


Sampras is not my fave player for the many reasons I've already covered,
but he is the best big match player ever imo. I have no reservations in
that analysis.




  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 13:58:08
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 19, 12:10 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> Professor X wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>
>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont
>>>>>>> have a hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on
>>>>>>> clay for at least few years
>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>>>>>> discussion, this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived
>>>>> for all to see.
>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
>>>> Roger get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>
>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when
>>> fed does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>
>> er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
>> nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. What
>> the fuck are you smoking? Can you demonstrate why future historians
>> will be overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?
>>
>> Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. You people never seem
>> to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
>> stupidity in this ng.
>
> huh you are the one who is a moron.... you talk about historians
> looking back on a 1time ao winner and 0 time gslam champ. HOWEVER you
> tipped Murray to have AT LEAST TWICE AS GOOD A CAREER AS DJOKOVIC
> after the USOPEN which would mean 2 slams at least whispshit (and
> that's if djoko doesn't win anymore --- very very unlikely....
> I'd be highly surprised if murray and djok didn't get at least two
> each. You are the one with Seibs... (Sampras Era is best syndrome)


You missed my point.





   
Date: 19 Feb 2009 13:31:17
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:58:08 +0100, "*skriptis"
<skriptis@post.t-com.hr > wrote:

>Professor X wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 12:10 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>> Professor X wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>
>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont
>>>>>>>> have a hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on
>>>>>>>> clay for at least few years
>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>>>>>>> discussion, this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived
>>>>>> for all to see.
>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
>>>>> Roger get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>>
>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when
>>>> fed does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>>
>>> er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
>>> nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. What
>>> the fuck are you smoking? Can you demonstrate why future historians
>>> will be overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?
>>>
>>> Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. You people never seem
>>> to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
>>> stupidity in this ng.
>>
>> huh you are the one who is a moron.... you talk about historians
>> looking back on a 1time ao winner and 0 time gslam champ. HOWEVER you
>> tipped Murray to have AT LEAST TWICE AS GOOD A CAREER AS DJOKOVIC
>> after the USOPEN which would mean 2 slams at least whispshit (and
>> that's if djoko doesn't win anymore --- very very unlikely....
>> I'd be highly surprised if murray and djok didn't get at least two
>> each. You are the one with Seibs... (Sampras Era is best syndrome)
>
>
> You missed my point.
>
>

You sir, have no point other than whispers point of course. That makes
you redundant here.


    
Date: 20 Feb 2009 11:26:39
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
"Superdave" <the.big.rst.kahuna@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:pmnqp45anj7ne6ns14ljant9ibaso84bof@4ax.com...
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 13:58:08 +0100, "*skriptis"
> <skriptis@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
>>Professor X wrote:
>>> On Feb 19, 12:10 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>>> Professor X wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>>
>>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont
>>>>>>>>> have a hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on
>>>>>>>>> clay for at least few years
>>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>>>>>>>> discussion, this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived
>>>>>>> for all to see.
>>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
>>>>>> Roger get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>>>
>>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when
>>>>> fed does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>>>
>>>> er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
>>>> nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. What
>>>> the fuck are you smoking? Can you demonstrate why future historians
>>>> will be overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?
>>>>
>>>> Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. You people never seem
>>>> to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
>>>> stupidity in this ng.
>>>
>>> huh you are the one who is a moron.... you talk about historians
>>> looking back on a 1time ao winner and 0 time gslam champ. HOWEVER you
>>> tipped Murray to have AT LEAST TWICE AS GOOD A CAREER AS DJOKOVIC
>>> after the USOPEN which would mean 2 slams at least whispshit (and
>>> that's if djoko doesn't win anymore --- very very unlikely....
>>> I'd be highly surprised if murray and djok didn't get at least two
>>> each. You are the one with Seibs... (Sampras Era is best syndrome)
>>
>>
>> You missed my point.
>>
>>
>
> You sir, have no point other than whispers point of course. That makes
> you redundant here.

even though his point is common sense and correct.



 
Date: 19 Feb 2009 02:21:07
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 19, 1:19=A0am, "xami...@gmail.com" <xami...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 18 f=E9v, 18:20, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon....@gmmmmail.com> wrote in message
>
> >news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
>
> > > Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>
> > >>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> >On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >>> >> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> >> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > >>> >> > > served for the match and lost against simon
> > >>> >> > > took nadal to 3 sets
> > >>> >> > > and has beaten berdych....
>
> > >>> >> > > maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> > >>> >> > Maybe ...
>
> > >>> >> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont ha=
ve a
> > >>> >> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for=
at
> > >>> >> > least few years
>
> > >>> >> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discus=
sion,
> > >>> >> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>
> > >>> >Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for=
all
> > >>> >to see.
>
> > >>> >Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
> > >>> >Sampras like game.
>
> > >>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Ro=
ger
> > >>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>
> > >> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> > >> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when f=
ed
> > >> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> > >> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>
> > > On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7=
543
> > > and
> > > Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>
> > What would be fun in that?
>
> Having whsikey's fav "white knight" (Nadal) overtaking the one he was
> supposed to protect (in whiskey's *brain*) would be fun anyway (even
> if Federer wasn't to kill Pete on the idiotic 7543).
>
> In fact, I'll root for Nadal to do so, just to read whiskey's
> comments, just to see how he will change his mind about Nadal... And
> who he will pick to stop Nadal from passing Sampras.
>
> Share & Enjoy,
> Manolo

Me too , I hope both of them ( Nadal and Federer ) break Petes record
so it diminishes its ever more ... ( all within in a decade too )





  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 05:46:09
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
ghell666 wrote:
> On Feb 19, 1:19 am, "xami...@gmail.com" <xami...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 18 fv, 18:20, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> "Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon....@gmmmmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
>>>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>>>>> least few years
>>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>>>>>> to see.
>>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>>>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7543
>>>> and
>>>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>>> What would be fun in that?
>> Having whsikey's fav "white knight" (Nadal) overtaking the one he was
>> supposed to protect (in whiskey's *brain*) would be fun anyway (even
>> if Federer wasn't to kill Pete on the idiotic 7543).
>>
>> In fact, I'll root for Nadal to do so, just to read whiskey's
>> comments, just to see how he will change his mind about Nadal... And
>> who he will pick to stop Nadal from passing Sampras.
>>
>> Share & Enjoy,
>> Manolo
>
> Me too , I hope both of them ( Nadal and Federer ) break Petes record
> so it diminishes its ever more ... ( all within in a decade too )
>
>
>


That suggests you are an active Sampras-hater rather then being ambivalent.


   
Date: 20 Feb 2009 11:26:39
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
"Whisper" <beaver999@ozemail.com.au > wrote in message
news:499da8f5$0$654$5a62ac22@per-qv1-newsreader-01.iinet.net.au...
> ghell666 wrote:
>> On Feb 19, 1:19 am, "xami...@gmail.com" <xami...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 18 fv, 18:20, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> "Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon....@gmmmmail.com> wrote in message
>>>> news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
>>>>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have
>>>>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>>>>>> least few years
>>>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>>>>>>>>> discussion,
>>>>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for
>>>>>>>> all
>>>>>>>> to see.
>>>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
>>>>>>> Roger
>>>>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when
>>>>>> fed
>>>>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on
>>>>> 7543
>>>>> and
>>>>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>>>> What would be fun in that?
>>> Having whsikey's fav "white knight" (Nadal) overtaking the one he was
>>> supposed to protect (in whiskey's *brain*) would be fun anyway (even
>>> if Federer wasn't to kill Pete on the idiotic 7543).
>>>
>>> In fact, I'll root for Nadal to do so, just to read whiskey's
>>> comments, just to see how he will change his mind about Nadal... And
>>> who he will pick to stop Nadal from passing Sampras.
>>>
>>> Share & Enjoy,
>>> Manolo
>>
>> Me too , I hope both of them ( Nadal and Federer ) break Petes record
>> so it diminishes its ever more ... ( all within in a decade too )
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> That suggests you are an active Sampras-hater rather then being
> ambivalent.

that's exactly what most of the posters on this thread are, active Sampras
Detractors.



 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 22:25:22
From: drew
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 18, 11:55=A0pm, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr > wrote:



> You people should get a life, enjoy it whitout thinking what would/could
> upset Whisper.

You're Whisper, asshole. We all know it.

But you're not the problem. The problem is that your crap is spoiling
the memory people have of a great player because every time you spout
how great he was, it re-ignites the obvious arguments against his game
and reminds people of the weaknesses.

It would be like somebody trotting out the great results of any player
in the past like Connors for example and placing him above and beyond
everybody in history. Pretty soon we'd be talking about all of the
negative stuff about Connors just to set the record straight and that
would spoil the positive memories most of us (I would think) have of
his game.

First thing.
>
> Second thing, number don't lie, a goat is a goat.

And an asshole is an asshole. And you're an asshole.
.
>
> If there is another guy who takes that title away from Sampras, so what..=
I
> remember I wasn't living in agony during the 80s or 90s when bumrooter wa=
s
> GOAT.

What the fuck are you talking about?



  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 05:44:53
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
drew wrote:
> On Feb 18, 11:55 pm, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
>
>
>> You people should get a life, enjoy it whitout thinking what would/could
>> upset Whisper.
>
> You're Whisper, asshole. We all know it.


Let's assume I'm not - would I be justified in thinking you're paranoid?
Honest answer.


>
> But you're not the problem. The problem is that your crap is spoiling
> the memory people have of a great player because every time you spout
> how great he was, it re-ignites the obvious arguments against his game
> and reminds people of the weaknesses.


What a load of crock. All these twerps who've come out & said I'm
'spoiling' their recollections of Sampras speak in terms of 'not really
minding him' - read between the lines they hated him with every fibre.


>
> It would be like somebody trotting out the great results of any player
> in the past like Connors for example and placing him above and beyond
> everybody in history. Pretty soon we'd be talking about all of the
> negative stuff about Connors just to set the record straight and that
> would spoil the positive memories most of us (I would think) have of
> his game.



Sampras' results are similar to 'any' player? You're fucked.


>
> First thing.
>> Second thing, number don't lie, a goat is a goat.
>
> And an asshole is an asshole. And you're an asshole.


If numbers do lie then Fed/Rafa's greater numbers than say Becker/Guga
are meaningless.


> .
>> If there is another guy who takes that title away from Sampras, so what..I
>> remember I wasn't living in agony during the 80s or 90s when bumrooter was
>> GOAT.
>
> What the fuck are you talking about?
>



He means you don't actually have to like the goat to acknowledge the
fucking obvious. You really must be a clown to think Jimbo has pretty
much same title to goat as Sampras.


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 07:28:14
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
drew wrote:
> On Feb 18, 11:55 pm, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>
>
>
>> You people should get a life, enjoy it whitout thinking what
>> would/could upset Whisper.
>
> You're Whisper, asshole. We all know it.
>
> But you're not the problem. The problem is that your crap is spoiling
> the memory people have of a great player because every time you spout
> how great he was, it re-ignites the obvious arguments against his game
> and reminds people of the weaknesses.
>
> It would be like somebody trotting out the great results of any player
> in the past like Connors for example and placing him above and beyond
> everybody in history. Pretty soon we'd be talking about all of the
> negative stuff about Connors just to set the record straight and that
> would spoil the positive memories most of us (I would think) have of
> his game.
>
> First thing.
>>
>> Second thing, number don't lie, a goat is a goat.
>
> And an asshole is an asshole. And you're an asshole.


Man you're losing it.






 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 17:19:12
From: xamigax@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 18 f=E9v, 18:20, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr > wrote:
> "Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon....@gmmmmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
>
>
>
> > Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>
> >>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> >> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> >> > > served for the match and lost against simon
> >>> >> > > took nadal to 3 sets
> >>> >> > > and has beaten berdych....
>
> >>> >> > > maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> >>> >> > Maybe ...
>
> >>> >> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have=
a
> >>> >> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for a=
t
> >>> >> > least few years
>
> >>> >> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussi=
on,
> >>> >> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>
> >>> >Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for a=
ll
> >>> >to see.
>
> >>> >Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
> >>> >Sampras like game.
>
> >>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roge=
r
> >>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>
> >> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> >> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
> >> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> >> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>
> > On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 754=
3
> > and
> > Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>
> What would be fun in that?

Having whsikey's fav "white knight" (Nadal) overtaking the one he was
supposed to protect (in whiskey's *brain*) would be fun anyway (even
if Federer wasn't to kill Pete on the idiotic 7543).

In fact, I'll root for Nadal to do so, just to read whiskey's
comments, just to see how he will change his mind about Nadal... And
who he will pick to stop Nadal from passing Sampras.

Share & Enjoy,
Manolo


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 05:55:06
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
xamigax@gmail.com wrote:
> On 18 fv, 18:20, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>> "Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon....@gmmmmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>> news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
>>
>>
>>
>>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>
>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>
>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>
>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>
>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont
>>>>>>>> have a hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on
>>>>>>>> clay for at least few years
>>
>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>>>>>>> discussion, this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>
>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived
>>>>>> for all to see.
>>
>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using
>>>>>> a Sampras like game.
>>
>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
>>>>> Roger get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>
>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when
>>>> fed does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>
>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on
>>> 7543 and
>>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>>
>> What would be fun in that?
>
> Having whsikey's fav "white knight" (Nadal) overtaking the one he was
> supposed to protect (in whiskey's *brain*) would be fun anyway (even
> if Federer wasn't to kill Pete on the idiotic 7543).
>
> In fact, I'll root for Nadal to do so, just to read whiskey's
> comments, just to see how he will change his mind about Nadal... And
> who he will pick to stop Nadal from passing Sampras.
>
> Share & Enjoy,
> Manolo


You people should get a life, enjoy it whitout thinking what would/could
upset Whisper. First thing.

Second thing, number don't lie, a goat is a goat.

During 80s and 90s open era goat was not among my favorite players (borg).
During 00s I can say open era goat was among my favourite players.
(sampras).

If there is another guy who takes that title away from Sampras, so what..I
remember I wasn't living in agony during the 80s or 90s when bumrooter was
GOAT.




   
Date: 19 Feb 2009 05:06:35
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 05:55:06 +0100, "*skriptis"
<skriptis@post.t-com.hr > wrote:

>xamigax@gmail.com wrote:
>> On 18 fv, 18:20, "*skriptis" <skrip...@post.t-com.hr> wrote:
>>> "Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon....@gmmmmail.com> wrote in message
>>>
>>> news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>
>>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>
>>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>
>>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont
>>>>>>>>> have a hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on
>>>>>>>>> clay for at least few years
>>>
>>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras
>>>>>>>> discussion, this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>
>>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived
>>>>>>> for all to see.
>>>
>>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using
>>>>>>> a Sampras like game.
>>>
>>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see
>>>>>> Roger get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>>
>>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when
>>>>> fed does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>>
>>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on
>>>> 7543 and
>>>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>>>
>>> What would be fun in that?
>>
>> Having whsikey's fav "white knight" (Nadal) overtaking the one he was
>> supposed to protect (in whiskey's *brain*) would be fun anyway (even
>> if Federer wasn't to kill Pete on the idiotic 7543).
>>
>> In fact, I'll root for Nadal to do so, just to read whiskey's
>> comments, just to see how he will change his mind about Nadal... And
>> who he will pick to stop Nadal from passing Sampras.
>>
>> Share & Enjoy,
>> Manolo
>
>
>You people should get a life, enjoy it whitout thinking what would/could
>upset Whisper. First thing.
>
>Second thing, number don't lie, a goat is a goat.
>
>During 80s and 90s open era goat was not among my favorite players (borg).
>During 00s I can say open era goat was among my favourite players.
>(sampras).
>
>If there is another guy who takes that title away from Sampras, so what..I
>remember I wasn't living in agony during the 80s or 90s when bumrooter was
>GOAT.
>


no. you were being goat fucked then and now you are a goat fucker.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 17:14:35
From: xamigax@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 18 f=E9v, 18:02, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 12:14=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
> > ghell666 wrote:
> > > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> served for the match and lost against simon
> > >> took nadal to 3 sets
> > >> and has beaten berdych....
>
> > >> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> > > Maybe ...
>
> > > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> > > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> > > least few years
>
> > He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>
> Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem than
> they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.

Yep,

not the first time here that some of us are saying that Sampras aura
is dulled by never-stoppping whisperism.

Maybe whiskey believes that we are saying that "for the hell of it",
that we don't actually think such for real.
Well, I do.
Before RST I was quite okay with my Pete's memories... and mostly
agreed with what ghell666 is saying above: great non-interesting
player.
Awesome serve, excellent volleys, a bit of a dram queen on easy
smashes...
And mostly lost on clay, no matter how weak the opponent was.
Can't remember a single match I cared about, if not for Pete's
opponent.
Took slam records over Emerson, wich never was any relevant to me, for
I never picked Roy over Rod or Bjorn.

Of unlikely friend from down-under has me successfully remind few of
the worse things that had vanished from my souvenirs about Sampras.
Taking me sometimes to be angry more at Pete than at Whiskey (kind of
a "domino" logic: if there has been no Sampras, they would not be any
whiskey), wich is sad for Pete; because I can't blame him for having
so clownish suppporter.

Share & Enjoy,
Manolo


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 11:14:54
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 18 Feb, 17:02, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 12:14=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
> > ghell666 wrote:
> > > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> served for the match and lost against simon
> > >> took nadal to 3 sets
> > >> and has beaten berdych....
>
> > >> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> > > Maybe ...
>
> > > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> > > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> > > least few years
>
> > He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>
> Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem than
> they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.

Thats the irony - I dont Hate as in HATE HATE the guy - but I sure as
hell couldnt stand good ol W piping his tune - hence why I left for
many years.

I think Sampras has probably the greatest serve of all time and I
always like the effortless motion he displayed in cleanly hitting hit
along with some of his touch at the net - but thats it.

The guys boring - dressed dull - really had no matches I cared about
or liked unless they were against players I liked and most of all rode
his serve and weak competition to steal more slams than he should of.

A clown on clay
that brushed the lines
with a tongue that swayed


  
Date: 20 Feb 2009 11:26:38
From: Iceberg
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
"ghell666" <matt.tippen@gmail.com > wrote in message
news:d50c38bf-bc7c-4f99-9ff3-fae7e9eee81c@q9g2000yqc.googlegroups.com...
> On 18 Feb, 17:02, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 12:14 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> > ghell666 wrote:
>> > > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> served for the match and lost against simon
>> > >> took nadal to 3 sets
>> > >> and has beaten berdych....
>>
>> > >> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>
>> > > Maybe ...
>>
>> > > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>> > > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>> > > least few years
>>
>> > He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>>
>> Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem than
>> they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.
>
> Thats the irony - I dont Hate as in HATE HATE the guy - but I sure as
> hell couldnt stand good ol W piping his tune - hence why I left for
> many years.
>
> I think Sampras has probably the greatest serve of all time and I
> always like the effortless motion he displayed in cleanly hitting hit
> along with some of his touch at the net - but thats it.
>
> The guys boring - dressed dull - really had no matches I cared about
> or liked unless they were against players I liked and most of all rode
> his serve and weak competition to steal more slams than he should of.
>
> A clown on clay
> that brushed the lines
> with a tongue that swayed

ah so you do know nothing about tennis.



 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 09:02:06
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 18, 12:14=A0pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> ghell666 wrote:
> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> served for the match and lost against simon
> >> took nadal to 3 sets
> >> and has beaten berdych....
>
> >> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> > Maybe ...
>
> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> > least few years
>
> He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.

Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem than
they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 23:11:59
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 18, 12:14 pm, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>> ghell666 wrote:
>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>> Maybe ...
>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>> least few years
>> He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>
> Actually a lot of people around here hold sampras in lower esteem than
> they would have, and it's solely BECAUSE of you.


I shouldn't be surprised but I am - this is retardo.sport.tennis.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 09:00:40
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 18, 4:20=A0pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>
>
>
> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> On Feb 18, 12:04=A0pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > served for the match and lost against simon
> >> > > took nadal to 3 sets
> >> > > and has beaten berdych....
>
> >> > > maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> >> > Maybe ...
>
> >> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> >> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> >> > least few years
>
> >> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
> >> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>
> >Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
> >to see.
>
> >Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
> >Sampras like game.
>
> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !

Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.


  
Date: 19 Feb 2009 23:10:50
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Professor X wrote:
> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>
>>
>>
>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>> least few years
>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>> to see.
>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>> Sampras like game.
>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>
> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.


er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. What the
fuck are you smoking? Can you demonstrate why future historians will be
overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?

Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. You people never seem
to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
stupidity in this ng.


   
Date: 19 Feb 2009 12:39:34
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:10:50 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>Professor X wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>> least few years
>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>>> to see.
>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>> Sampras like game.
>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>
>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>
>
>er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
>nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. What the
>fuck are you smoking? Can you demonstrate why future historians will be
>overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?
>
>Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. You people never seem
>to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
>stupidity in this ng.


er .... Rafa has done nothing in historical terms either and yet you
fawn him like he has.

Federer has dominated the sport in historical terms like no other, won
5 W's in a row and 13 slams. Yet, in your mind he has done fuck all.

Millions wonder why.

A few smart people know why. You are absolutely scared shitless that
Roger will top Sampras and even the xxxx barrier you thought would
withstand all attempts.

So, you fawn and promote Rafa as a means to denigrate Roger looking
for a reason, any reason, that you can use to say he isn't the goat
when he does top Sampras and your precious xxxx.

I can see you laying the groundwork already. Like no matter how many
slams he wins, no matter 20 and 10 W's you will say but hey he lost
all his slam finals to one guy so how can he be goat. Right ?

You see. You're nothing but a cunt and rst now recognizes your odor in
the dark.


    
Date: 20 Feb 2009 05:57:24
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Superdave wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:10:50 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Professor X wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>>> least few years
>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>>>> to see.
>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>
>> er, Djoke/Murray have done absolutely fuck all in historical terms &
>> nobody gets credit for tough era because those 2 are playing. What the
>> fuck are you smoking? Can you demonstrate why future historians will be
>> overawed by a 1 time AO winner & a 0 slammer?
>>
>> Fucking ceibs shit is getting worse by the day. You people never seem
>> to get it through your thick heads - I'm gobsmacked at the abject
>> stupidity in this ng.
>
>
> er .... Rafa has done nothing in historical terms either and yet you
> fawn him like he has.


Never losing a match on his way to winning his 1st 4 FO's is unique. He
also proves Fed accumulated his slams v clowns.


>
> Federer has dominated the sport in historical terms like no other, won
> 5 W's in a row and 13 slams. Yet, in your mind he has done fuck all.


He has a super record, but no way has he achieved more than Sampras. If
Pete had his numbers he wouldn't be goat.



>
> Millions wonder why.


Only rst retards like you wonder why - in the real world it's duh.


>
> A few smart people know why. You are absolutely scared shitless that
> Roger will top Sampras and even the xxxx barrier you thought would
> withstand all attempts.


Of course not. I just refuse to give him credit for topping Sampras
until he actually does it.


>
> So, you fawn and promote Rafa as a means to denigrate Roger looking
> for a reason, any reason, that you can use to say he isn't the goat
> when he does top Sampras and your precious xxxx.
>
> I can see you laying the groundwork already. Like no matter how many
> slams he wins, no matter 20 and 10 W's you will say but hey he lost
> all his slam finals to one guy so how can he be goat. Right ?


Of course that would mean he couldn't possibly be ability goat. The
same way nobody thinks Borg was a better player than McEnroe.


>
> You see. You're nothing but a cunt and rst now recognizes your odor in
> the dark.


I'm 100% objective.


  
Date: 18 Feb 2009 14:02:15
From: Javier Gonzalez
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Professor X <suebokaian@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 4:20pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>
>>
>>
>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> >> On Feb 18, 12:04pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >> > > served for the match and lost against simon
>> >> > > took nadal to 3 sets
>> >> > > and has beaten berdych....
>>
>> >> > > maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>
>> >> > Maybe ...
>>
>> >> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>> >> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>> >> > least few years
>>
>> >> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>> >> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>
>> >Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>> >to see.
>>
>> >Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>> >Sampras like game.
>>
>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>
> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.

On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7543 and
Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.


   
Date: 19 Feb 2009 23:16:27
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Javier Gonzalez wrote:
> Professor X <suebokaian@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>> least few years
>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>>> to see.
>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>> Sampras like game.
>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>
> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7543 and
> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.


There will be no squirming. If they can do that then my hat's off.
That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. But I'm
sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve it.
You're free to celebrate now if you like.



    
Date: 19 Feb 2009 12:44:16
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:16:27 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>> Professor X <suebokaian@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>>> least few years
>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>>>> to see.
>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>
>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7543 and
>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>
>
>There will be no squirming. If they can do that then my hat's off.
>That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. But I'm
>sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve it.
>You're free to celebrate now if you like.


That's another LIE !

You are "already squirming" because Roger is so close that I can see
when he tops Pete you will say how can he be goat when he lost every
final to Rafa ?

At that point all your xxxx bullshit you will throw out the window.

Correct or not ?

Please confirm so we don't have to laught a t you even more later.


     
Date: 20 Feb 2009 05:58:09
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
Superdave wrote:
> On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:16:27 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au>
> wrote:
>
>> Javier Gonzalez wrote:
>>> Professor X <suebokaian@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>>>>>>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>>>>>>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>>>>>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>>>>>> Maybe ...
>>>>>>>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>>>>>>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>>>>>>> least few years
>>>>>>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>>>>>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>>>> Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>>>>> to see.
>>>>>> Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>>>>> Sampras like game.
>>>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>>>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>>>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>>>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>>> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7543 and
>>> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.
>>
>> There will be no squirming. If they can do that then my hat's off.
>> That's what it'll take to top Sampras & they'll deserve it. But I'm
>> sure as fuck not giving them any credit for it until they achieve it.
>> You're free to celebrate now if you like.
>
>
> That's another LIE !
>
> You are "already squirming" because Roger is so close that I can see
> when he tops Pete you will say how can he be goat when he lost every
> final to Rafa ?
>
> At that point all your xxxx bullshit you will throw out the window.
>
> Correct or not ?
>
> Please confirm so we don't have to laught a t you even more later.


Nothing new to add to what's on record. Stop wasting b/w.


   
Date: 18 Feb 2009 18:20:59
From: *skriptis
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form

"Javier Gonzalez" <ja.gon.zal@gmmmmail.com > wrote in message
news:nhrt66-ple.ln1@despair.pu239.ru...
> Professor X <suebokaian@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 4:20 pm, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> >> On Feb 18, 12:04 pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> >> > > served for the match and lost against simon
>>> >> > > took nadal to 3 sets
>>> >> > > and has beaten berdych....
>>>
>>> >> > > maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>>
>>> >> > Maybe ...
>>>
>>> >> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>>> >> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>>> >> > least few years
>>>
>>> >> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>>> >> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>>>
>>> >Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>>> >to see.
>>>
>>> >Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>>> >Sampras like game.
>>>
>>> How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
>>> get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !
>>
>> Yes, indeed I agree with that.... and with Nadal a 6 slam champ,
>> djoker, + murray no way would a weak era argument stand up if/when fed
>> does get there since he would have won 4/5 slams while the
>> afformentioned young guns were at/near prime.
>
> On this point of view, I would wish that Federer ends up with 83 on 7543
> and
> Nadal with 81-82. *That* would be funny for the squirm factor.


What would be fun in that?




 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 08:14:22
From: drew
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 18, 4:53 am, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> served for the match and lost against simon
> took nadal to 3 sets
> and has beaten berdych....
>
> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.



I haven't seen him play. Nadal was interviewed and he felt that
Dmitrov was on his way to top 10 in a hurry.

I'd like to see him competitive at the top soon. If Murray, Djokovic,
Nadal, Federer, and Verdasco are playing well, it could be an
interesting season with the addition of Dmitrov.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> On Feb 18, 12:04=A0pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > served for the match and lost against simon
> > > took nadal to 3 sets
> > > and has beaten berdych....
>
> > > maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> > Maybe ...
>
> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> > least few years
>
> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!

Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
to see.

Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
Sampras like game.

Hopefully Grigor will emulate Roger more who was class act and not
some grass swindling spanker whos married a slut


  
Date: 18 Feb 2009 16:20:05
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:18:47 -0800 (PST), ghell666
<matt.tippen@gmail.com > wrote:

>On 18 Feb, 13:06, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> On Feb 18, 12:04pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > > served for the match and lost against simon
>> > > took nadal to 3 sets
>> > > and has beaten berdych....
>>
>> > > maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>
>> > Maybe ...
>>
>> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>> > least few years
>>
>> oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
>> this time after only 2 POSTS!!!
>
>Whisper cant help himself its age old tradition thats archived for all
>to see.
>
>Whisper is insecure about any else topping Sampras without using a
>Sampras like game.

How true and ya know what ? The only reason I really want to see Roger
get 15 or more is so whisper will SHUT THE FUCK UP !


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 05:06:07
From: Professor X
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 18, 12:04=A0pm, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > served for the match and lost against simon
> > took nadal to 3 sets
> > and has beaten berdych....
>
> > maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> Maybe ...
>
> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> least few years

oh my god yet another thread that descends into a sampras discussion,
this time after only 2 POSTS!!!


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 04:41:54
From:
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Feb 18, 7:29=A0am, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On 18 Feb, 12:14, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>
> > ghell666 wrote:
> > > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > >> served for the match and lost against simon
> > >> took nadal to 3 sets
> > >> and has beaten berdych....
>
> > >> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> > > Maybe ...
>
> > > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> > > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> > > least few years
>
> > He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>
> You mean " your " world .
>
> I dont think the rest of the world could give sweet shit Pete and his
> 7 clown years of sodomy on grass.
>
> I mean if they did , you wouldnt of had to spend the last 11 every
> waking moment on this ng telling everyone - no >?

Pete's record is insanely good and clearly makes him one of the
candidates for goathood.

He wasn't tennis' equivalent of Tiger Woods as he does have some holes
people can point to, obviously
the lack of a FO title being by far the biggest one.


  
Date: 18 Feb 2009 16:18:07
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 04:41:54 -0800 (PST), jasoncatlin1971@gmail.com
wrote:

>On Feb 18, 7:29am, ghell666 <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On 18 Feb, 12:14, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au> wrote:
>>
>> > ghell666 wrote:
>> > > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> > >> served for the match and lost against simon
>> > >> took nadal to 3 sets
>> > >> and has beaten berdych....
>>
>> > >> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>
>> > > Maybe ...
>>
>> > > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>> > > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>> > > least few years
>>
>> > He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.
>>
>> You mean " your " world .
>>
>> I dont think the rest of the world could give sweet shit Pete and his
>> 7 clown years of sodomy on grass.
>>
>> I mean if they did , you wouldnt of had to spend the last 11 every
>> waking moment on this ng telling everyone - no >?
>
>Pete's record is insanely good and clearly makes him one of the
>candidates for goathood.
>
>He wasn't tennis' equivalent of Tiger Woods as he does have some holes
>people can point to, obviously
>the lack of a FO title being by far the biggest one.


yeah that's bad but not even having made a final is a disgrace, only 1
SF adds to that disgrace and losing EIGHT TIMES IN R1/R2 to clowns is
ABSOLUTE IGNOMINY !

then there are those here in rst who claim he was better on clay than
Federer !

ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

oh wait ! It's only ONE guy !

ah ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha ha

he needs to repeat basic tennis anaylsts training 101.


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 04:29:31
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 18 Feb, 12:14, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> ghell666 wrote:
> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> served for the match and lost against simon
> >> took nadal to 3 sets
> >> and has beaten berdych....
>
> >> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> > Maybe ...
>
> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> > least few years
>
> He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.

You mean " your " world .

I dont think the rest of the world could give sweet shit Pete and his
7 clown years of sodomy on grass.

I mean if they did , you wouldnt of had to spend the last 11 every
waking moment on this ng telling everyone - no >?


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 04:28:53
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 18 Feb, 12:14, Whisper <beaver...@ozemail.com.au > wrote:
> ghell666 wrote:
> > On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> served for the match and lost against simon
> >> took nadal to 3 sets
> >> and has beaten berdych....
>
> >> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> > Maybe ...
>
> > I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> > hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> > least few years
>
> He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.

You mean " your " world .

I dont think the rest of the world could give sweet shit Pete and his
7 clown years of sodomy on grass.

I mean if they didnt , you wouldnt of had to spend the last 11 every
waking moment on this ng telling everyone - no >?


 
Date: 18 Feb 2009 04:04:47
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> served for the match and lost against simon
> took nadal to 3 sets
> and has beaten berdych....
>
> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.

Maybe ...

I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
least few years


  
Date: 18 Feb 2009 23:14:06
From: Whisper
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
ghell666 wrote:
> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> served for the match and lost against simon
>> took nadal to 3 sets
>> and has beaten berdych....
>>
>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>
> Maybe ...
>
> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
> least few years


He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.


   
Date: 18 Feb 2009 16:14:31
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: Yes Dmitrov is top30 already on current form
On Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:14:06 +1100, Whisper <beaver999@ozemail.com.au >
wrote:

>ghell666 wrote:
>> On 18 Feb, 09:53, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>> served for the match and lost against simon
>>> took nadal to 3 sets
>>> and has beaten berdych....
>>>
>>> maybe this guy will be the next big thing, not murray/nole.
>>
>> Maybe ...
>>
>> I still havent seen him but if he is like Pete then he wont have a
>> hope in hell of being GOAT - esp with Nadal around on clay for at
>> least few years
>
>
>He won't be 'your' goat but the rest of the world has Sampras at No.1.

No they don't.