| |
Main
Date: 28 Oct 2006 19:23:31
From: Michal Jankowski
Subject: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?
|
What is she doing in the main draw in Hasselt?
MJ
|
|
| |
Date: 28 Oct 2006 16:47:36
From:
Subject: Re: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?
|
In article <2ny7r04ang.fsf@ccfs1.fuw.edu.pl >, michalj@fuw.edu.pl (Michal
Jankowski) wrote:
> What is she doing in the main draw in Hasselt?
Playing a tournament near her home?
wg
|
| | |
Date: 29 Oct 2006 00:00:06
From: Michal Jankowski
Subject: Re: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?
|
wendyg@cix.compulink.co.uk writes:
> In article <2ny7r04ang.fsf@ccfs1.fuw.edu.pl>, michalj@fuw.edu.pl (Michal
> Jankowski) wrote:
>
>> What is she doing in the main draw in Hasselt?
>
> Playing a tournament near her home?
And that's enough to get an entry to the main draw while being ranked
1xx? Note she is _not_ listed as a WC.
MJ
|
| | | |
Date: 29 Oct 2006 02:40:30
From: Ted of Ted's Tennis
Subject: Re: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?
|
Somebody claiming to be Michal Jankowski <michalj@fuw.edu.pl > wrote at
Sat, 28 2006 22:00:06 GMT:
> wendyg@cix.compulink.co.uk writes:
>
>> In article <2ny7r04ang.fsf@ccfs1.fuw.edu.pl>, michalj@fuw.edu.pl
>> (Michal Jankowski) wrote:
>>
>>> What is she doing in the main draw in Hasselt?
>>
>> Playing a tournament near her home?
>
> And that's enough to get an entry to the main draw while being ranked
> 1xx? Note she is _not_ listed as a WC.
She was the runner-up to Oprandi at the Denain $75K Challenger (second
week of the US Open), and the runner-up to Müller the next week at
Bordeaux. Perhaps one of these gave a feed-up to the Hasselt main draw to
the winner, but since Oprandi and Müller would have had high enough
rankings not to need the feed-up, it went to Kloesel instead.
--
Ted Schuerzinger <http://tedstennis.tripod.com/index.html >
Are you children so hung up on finally achieving puberty that you
can't ever discuss tennis in grown-up language?
pltrgyst, in <frrf42h0va9he9fju2m2modoeovnok3ncr@4ax.com >
|
| | |
Date: 29 Oct 2006 07:34:56
From: Michal Jankowski
Subject: Re: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?
|
"Ted of Ted's Tennis" <tedstennis@myrealbox.com > writes:
> She was the runner-up to Oprandi at the Denain $75K Challenger (second
> week of the US Open), and the runner-up to Müller the next week at
> Bordeaux. Perhaps one of these gave a feed-up to the Hasselt main draw to
> the winner, but since Oprandi and Müller would have had high enough
> rankings not to need the feed-up, it went to Kloesel instead.
I see. Thanks.
MJ
|
| | | |
Date: 29 Oct 2006 23:26:57
From: Sakari Lund
Subject: Re: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?
|
On Sun, 29 2006 07:34:56 +0100, Michal Jankowski
<michalj@fuw.edu.pl > wrote:
>"Ted of Ted's Tennis" <tedstennis@myrealbox.com> writes:
>
>> She was the runner-up to Oprandi at the Denain $75K Challenger (second
>> week of the US Open), and the runner-up to Müller the next week at
>> Bordeaux. Perhaps one of these gave a feed-up to the Hasselt main draw to
>> the winner, but since Oprandi and Müller would have had high enough
>> rankings not to need the feed-up, it went to Kloesel instead.
>
>I see. Thanks.
It looks like they have put a lot of qualifiers in the top of the
draw. That's very thoughtful of them to give Kim nice and easy
comeback in her home tournament :-) And there is no Schnyder in the
draw. So does that mean she has given up on YEC?
|
| | | | |
Date: 29 Oct 2006 21:35:13
From: Vari L. Cinicke
Subject: Re: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?
|
Sakari Lund wrote:
> On Sun, 29 2006 07:34:56 +0100, Michal Jankowski
> <michalj@fuw.edu.pl> wrote:
>
>> "Ted of Ted's Tennis" <tedstennis@myrealbox.com> writes:
>>
>>> She was the runner-up to Oprandi at the Denain $75K Challenger (second
>>> week of the US Open), and the runner-up to Müller the next week at
>>> Bordeaux. Perhaps one of these gave a feed-up to the Hasselt main draw to
>>> the winner, but since Oprandi and Müller would have had high enough
>>> rankings not to need the feed-up, it went to Kloesel instead.
>> I see. Thanks.
>
> It looks like they have put a lot of qualifiers in the top of the
> draw. That's very thoughtful of them to give Kim nice and easy
> comeback in her home tournament :-) And there is no Schnyder in the
> draw. So does that mean she has given up on YEC?
They have declared Kim in for the YEC. That is all that matters.
--
Cheers,
vc
|
| | | | | |
Date: 30 Oct 2006 00:03:27
From: Sakari Lund
Subject: Re: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?
|
On Sun, 29 2006 21:35:13 GMT, "Vari L. Cinicke"
<cinicke@netscape.net > wrote:
>Sakari Lund wrote:
>> On Sun, 29 2006 07:34:56 +0100, Michal Jankowski
>> <michalj@fuw.edu.pl> wrote:
>>
>>> "Ted of Ted's Tennis" <tedstennis@myrealbox.com> writes:
>>>
>>>> She was the runner-up to Oprandi at the Denain $75K Challenger (second
>>>> week of the US Open), and the runner-up to Müller the next week at
>>>> Bordeaux. Perhaps one of these gave a feed-up to the Hasselt main draw to
>>>> the winner, but since Oprandi and Müller would have had high enough
>>>> rankings not to need the feed-up, it went to Kloesel instead.
>>> I see. Thanks.
>>
>> It looks like they have put a lot of qualifiers in the top of the
>> draw. That's very thoughtful of them to give Kim nice and easy
>> comeback in her home tournament :-) And there is no Schnyder in the
>> draw. So does that mean she has given up on YEC?
>
>They have declared Kim in for the YEC. That is all that matters.
Yes, I noticed when I read a few threads more... :-)
|
| | |
Date: 29 Oct 2006 22:51:50
From: Michal Jankowski
Subject: Hasselt (Re: Sandra Kloesel, anyone?)
|
Sakari Lund <sakari.lund@welho.com > writes:
> It looks like they have put a lot of qualifiers in the top of the
> draw. That's very thoughtful of them to give Kim nice and easy
> comeback in her home tournament :-) And there is no Schnyder in the
> draw. So does that mean she has given up on YEC?
She's trailing Clijsters by 156 points. A win in Hasselt is worth 120
points, so she cannot overtake Kim no matter what. She's tired. Better
to be rested in case someone withdraws.
Note also that:
1) There are 10 (sic!) places in the main draw to be filled by Q/LLs.
So, 4 qualification winners, 4 qualification runner-ups, and then
what? 2 losers from the qualification 2nd round? Are they still
around?
2) There is now a player ranked 1482 in the main draw 8-). I thought
you needed 3 results to be ranked at all - is it no longer true?
MJ
|
|
