tennis-forum.net
Promoting tennis discussion.

Main
Date: 17 Feb 2009 02:00:04
From: Professor X
Subject: that's two exibitions sampras has now lost to players outside or
Haas & Hewitt....

how do you explain your Sampras would still be top 5 theory now
Whisper?




 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 03:01:43
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: that's two exibitions sampras has now lost to players outside or
On Feb 17, 10:37=A0am, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:29:05 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>
>
>
> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 17 Feb, 10:00, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Haas & Hewitt....
>
> >> how do you explain your Sampras would still be top 5 theory now
> >> Whisper?
>
> >Also Hewitt leads 6 -4 in head to heads
> >Along With George Bastel
> >Krajieck
> >Stich
>
> >Thats double the amount of players who have winning record over Roger
> >and one of them aint even won a slam .
>
> >If you combined the other 3 you still only have 4 slams at best which
> >Nadal at 21 has already exceeded .
>
> >I wonder if Sampras has the balls to ask him for exhibition on clay
> >now hes confessed to hitting the ball better than when he was on the
> >tour ?
>
> r u kidding ? he won't even ask galo blanco for a rematch !

Do you think Borg could beat him on clay , if Mac can do it on hard ?


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 02:59:38
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: that's two exibitions sampras has now lost to players outside or
On Feb 17, 10:37=A0am, Superdave <the.big.rst.kah...@gmail.com > wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:29:05 -0800 (PST), ghell666
>
>
>
> <matt.tip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >On 17 Feb, 10:00, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> Haas & Hewitt....
>
> >> how do you explain your Sampras would still be top 5 theory now
> >> Whisper?
>
> >Also Hewitt leads 6 -4 in head to heads
> >Along With George Bastel
> >Krajieck
> >Stich
>
> >Thats double the amount of players who have winning record over Roger
> >and one of them aint even won a slam .
>
> >If you combined the other 3 you still only have 4 slams at best which
> >Nadal at 21 has already exceeded .
>
> >I wonder if Sampras has the balls to ask him for exhibition on clay
> >now hes confessed to hitting the ball better than when he was on the
> >tour ?
>
> r u kidding ? he won't even ask galo blanco for a rematch !

What about yzaga or whatever he was called ?

I'd like to see him have rematch against all his 1st round FO
opponents a year on - esp Thierry Champion !!


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 02:32:12
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: that's two exibitions sampras has now lost to players outside or
On 17 Feb, 10:00, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Haas & Hewitt....
>
> how do you explain your Sampras would still be top 5 theory now
> Whisper?

Probably too busy trying out those grips I mentioned with his dog /
wife / or whatever it is hes uses.


 
Date: 17 Feb 2009 02:29:05
From: ghell666
Subject: Re: that's two exibitions sampras has now lost to players outside or
On 17 Feb, 10:00, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com > wrote:
> Haas & Hewitt....
>
> how do you explain your Sampras would still be top 5 theory now
> Whisper?

Also Hewitt leads 6 -4 in head to heads
Along With George Bastel
Krajieck
Stich

Thats double the amount of players who have winning record over Roger
and one of them aint even won a slam .

If you combined the other 3 you still only have 4 slams at best which
Nadal at 21 has already exceeded .

I wonder if Sampras has the balls to ask him for exhibition on clay
now hes confessed to hitting the ball better than when he was on the
tour ?


  
Date: 17 Feb 2009 10:37:41
From: Superdave
Subject: Re: that's two exibitions sampras has now lost to players outside or marginally inside the top 100
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 02:29:05 -0800 (PST), ghell666
<matt.tippen@gmail.com > wrote:

>On 17 Feb, 10:00, Professor X <sueboka...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Haas & Hewitt....
>>
>> how do you explain your Sampras would still be top 5 theory now
>> Whisper?
>
>Also Hewitt leads 6 -4 in head to heads
>Along With George Bastel
>Krajieck
>Stich
>
>Thats double the amount of players who have winning record over Roger
>and one of them aint even won a slam .
>
>If you combined the other 3 you still only have 4 slams at best which
>Nadal at 21 has already exceeded .
>
>I wonder if Sampras has the balls to ask him for exhibition on clay
>now hes confessed to hitting the ball better than when he was on the
>tour ?


r u kidding ? he won't even ask galo blanco for a rematch !